References

Lowry R, Evans D. The privatised water industry and public health: back to square one. Br Dent J. 1999; 186:597-598
Jauncey Lord Opinion of Lord Jauncey in causa Mrs Catherine McColl (A P) against Strathclyde Regional Council.Edinburgh: The Court of Session; 1983
London: HMSO; 1985
London: HMSO; 1973
Castle P.London: John Libby; 1987
London: HMSO; 1991
London: HMSO; 2003
Groves B. Fluoride drinking ourselves to death?.Dublin: Newleaf; 2001
Boivin G, Chavassieux P, Chapuy MC, Baud CA, Meunier PJ. [Histomorphometric profile of bone fluorosis induced by prolonged ingestion of Vichy Saint-Yorre water. Comparison with bone fluorine levels]. Pathol Biol (Paris). 1986; 34:33-39
Juncos LI, Donadio JV Renal failure and fluorosis. J Am Med Assoc. 1972; 222:783-785
Teotia SPS, Teotia M. Dental caries: a disorder of high fluoride and low dietary calcium interactions (30 years personal research). Fluoride. 1994; 27:59-66
Working Group Report.London: MRC; 2002
Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2006
Yeung CA. A systematic review of the efficacy and safety of fluoridation. Evid-based Dent. 2008; 9:39-43
London: Pitman Medical; 1976
Knox EG.London: HMSO; 1985
York: The University of York, NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination; 2000
Haneke KE, Carson BL.North Carolina: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences; 2001
Jackson P, Harvey P, Young W.: Marlow; 2002
Maguire A, Zohouri FV, Mathers JC Bioavailability of fluoride in drinking water: a human experimental study. J Dent Res. 2005; 84:989-993
Cheng KK, Chalmers I, Sheldon TA. Adding fluoride to water supplies. Br Med J. 2007; 335:699-702
Urbansky ET, Schock MR. Can fluoride affect lead (II) in potable water? Hexafluorosilicate and fluoride equilibria in aqueous solution. Int J Environ Studies. 2000; 57:597-637
Sheldon T, Holgate ST, Steen IN Is artificial fluoride absorbed to the same extent as natural fluoride?. J Dent Res. 2008; 87
Whelton H, Crowley E, O'Mullane D Dental caries and enamel fluorosis among the fluoridated population in the Republic of Ireland and non fluoridated population in Northern Ireland in 2002. Community Dent Health. 2006; 23:37-43
Griffin SO, Gooch BF, Lockwood SA, Tomar SL. Quantifying the diffused benefit from water fluoridation in the United States. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2001; 29:120-129
Ekanayake L, van der Hoek W. Dental caries and developmental defects of enamel in relation to fluoride levels in drinking water in an arid area of Sri Lanka. Caries Res. 2002; 36:398-404
Ekanayake L, van der Hoek W. Prevalence and distribution of enamel defects and dental caries in a region with different concentrations of fluoride in drinking water in Sri Lanka. Int Dent J. 2003; 53:243-248
Grobler SR, Louw AJ, van Kotze TJ. Dental fluorosis and caries experience in relation to three different drinking water fluoride levels in South Africa. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2001; 11:372-379
Lowry RJ. Antifluoridation propaganda material – the tricks of the trade. Br Dent J. 2000; 189:528-530
Fitz-Gibbon S.: Spencer Fitz-Gibbon; 2003
Coggon D, Cooper C. Fluoridation of water supplies. Debate on the ethics must be informed by sound science. Br Med J. 1999; 319:269-270
Cross DW, Carton RJ. Fluoridation: a violation of medical ethics and human rights. Int J Occup Environ Health. 2003; 9:24-29
London: HMSO; 2000
Cohen H, Locker D. The science and ethics of water fluoridation. J Can Dent Assoc. 2001; 67:578-580
Fluoridation and individual freedom. Br Dent J. 1984; 156
London: DoH; 1999
Levy SM, Guha-Chowdhury N. Total fluoride intake and implications for dietary fluoride supplementation. J Public Health Dent. 1999; 59:211-223
Chowdhury NG, Brown RH, Shepherd MG. Fluoride intake of infants in New Zealand. J Dent Res. 1990; 69:1828-1833
Hinds K, Gregory JR.London: HMSO; 1995
Rugg-Gunn AJ, Carmichael CL, French AD, Furness JA. Fluoridation in Newcastle and Northumberland: a clinical study of 5-year-old children. Br Dent J. 1977; 142:359-402
Carmichael CL, Rugg-Gunn AJ, Ferrell RS. The relationship between fluoridation, social class and caries experience in 5 year old children in Newcastle and Northumberland in 1987. Br Dent J. 1989; 167:57-61
Hillier S, Cooper C, Kellingray S Fluoride in drinking water and risk of hip fracture in the UK: a case-control study. Lancet. 2000; 355:265-269
Phipps KR, Orwoll ES, Mason JD, Cauley JA. Community water fluoridation, bone mineral density, and fractures: prospective study of effects in older women. Br Med J. 2000; 321:860-864
Pretty IA. Caries detection and diagnosis: novel technologies. J Dent. 2006; 34:727-739
Amaechi BT, Higham SM. Quantitative light-induced fluorescence: a potential tool for general dental assessment. J Biomed Opt. 2002; 7:7-13
Berg JH. Caries detection. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2006; 18:3-4
Ismail AI, Sohn W, Tellez M The International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS): an integrated system for measuring dental caries. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2007; 35:170-178
Zandona AF, Zero DT. Diagnostic tools for early caries detection. J Am Dent Assoc. 2006; 137:1675-1684
de Josselin de Jong E, Sundstrom F, Westerling H A new method for in vivo quantification of changes in initial enamel caries with laser fluorescence. Caries Res. 1995; 29:2-7
Ricketts DN, Ekstrand KR, Martignon S Accuracy and reproducibility of conventional radiographic assessment and subtraction radiography in detecting demineralization in occlusal surfaces. Caries Res. 2007; 41:121-128
Tickle M. The 80:20 phenomenon: help or hindrance to planning caries prevention programmes?. Community Dent Health. 2002; 19:39-42
Provart SJ, Carmichael CL. The relationship between caries, fluoridation and material deprivation in five-year-old children in County Durham. Community Dent Health. 1995; 12:200-203
Jain P, Shankar A, Ramaiah S. Dental caries and social deprivation. Lancet. 2007; 369
Ellwood RP, Davies GM, Worthington HV Relationship between area deprivation and the anticaries benefit of an oral health programme providing free fluoride toothpaste to young children. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2004; 32:159-165
Martin B. The sociology of the fluoridation controversy: a re-examination. Sociol Quart. 1989; 30:59-76
Ammari AB, Bloch-Zupan A, Ashley PF. Systematic review of studies comparing the anti-caries efficacy of children's toothpaste containing 600 ppm of fluoride or less with high fluoride toothpastes of 1,000 ppm or above. Caries Res. 2003; 37:85-92
Ammari JB, Baqain ZH, Ashley PF. Effects of programs for prevention of early childhood caries. A systematic review. Med Princ Pract. 2007; 16:437-442
Curnow MM, Pine CM, Burnside G A randomised controlled trial of the efficacy of supervised toothbrushing in high-caries-risk children. Caries Res. 2002; 36:294-300
Griffin SO, Regnier E, Griffin PM, Huntley V. Effectiveness of fluoride in preventing caries in adults. J Dent Res. 2007; 86:410-415
Ten Cate JM. Fluorides in caries prevention and control: empiricism or science. Caries Res. 2004; 38:254-257
Featherstone JDB. The science and practice of caries prevention. J Am Dent Assoc. 2000; 131:887-899
Pizzo G, Piscopo MR, Pizzo I, Giuliana G. Community water fluoridation and caries prevention: a critical review. Clin Oral Investig. 2007; 11:189-193
Dugmore CR. The 80–20 phenomenon (80:20 distribution of caries) – myth or fact. Br Dent J. 2006; 201:197-198
Henry RJ. Why do 20% of our children experience 80% of the decay? An update on the status of childhood caries. Tex Dent J. 1997; 114:10-14
Tickle M, Milsom KM, Jenner TM, Blinkhorn AS. The geodemographic distribution of caries experience in neighboring fluoridated and nonfluoridated populations. J Public Health Dent. 2003; 63:92-98
Milsom KM, Blinkhorn AS, Tickle M. The incidence of dental caries in the primary molar teeth of young children receiving National Health Service funded dental care in practices in the North West of England. Br Dent J. 2008; 205
Gomez-Santos G, Gonzalez-Sierra MA, Vazquez-Garcia-Machinena J. Evolution of caries and fluorosis in schoolchildren of the Canary Islands (Spain): 1991, 1998, 2006. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2008; 13:E599-E608

The water fluoridation debate

From Volume 38, Issue 1, January 2011 | Pages 12-22

Authors

Michael G McGrady

BDS, PG Dip

StR/Honorary Lecturer in Dental Public Health, School of Dentistry, The University of Manchester, Higher Cambridge Street, Manchester

Articles by Michael G McGrady

Roger P Ellwood

BDS, MSc, MDS, PhD

Technology Manager, Dental Health Unit, Manchester Science Park, Manchester

Articles by Roger P Ellwood

Iain A Pretty

BDS, MSc, PhD, MFDS RCS

Senior Lecturer, Dental School and Hospital, Manchester, UK

Articles by Iain A Pretty

Abstract

Water fluoridation schemes have been employed for over 50 years. Water fluoridation has been a source of continuous debate between those who advocate its use as a public health measure and those who oppose it. There have been no new fluoridation schemes in the UK for nearly 30 years owing to principally legislative, but also geographic, financial, and political reasons. However, in early 2008, the UK Secretary of State for Health promoted the use of water fluoridation schemes for areas in England with the highest rates of decay. This article, the third and final article of three, aims to discuss the arguments surrounding water fluoridation and its continued relevance as a public health measure.

Clinical Relevance: This article aims to provide an update for general practitioners for the background and the current status of the water fluoridation debate and to enable them to answer non-clinical questions raised by patients.

Article

The first two articles in this series reviewed the history of fluorides in dentistry and of water fluoridation and the background for the evidence base that resulted in water fluoridation schemes. In this final article, we will examine the legal history and the current legislative status. We will discuss the arguments and evidence for those who advocate water fluoridation and those who oppose it as a dental public health measure. We will expand on the issues surrounding risk benefit for water fluoridation beyond dental fluorosis, and how they have altered with time. We will also discuss the continued relevance of water fluoridation as a contemporary public health measure.

Legislation of the water industry in the UK to protect the public and regulate the safety of water supplies has been in place for over 100 years. It appeared as a response to an outbreak of cholera from a public water supply.1 The majority of water companies were in the public sector for many years and were controlled at a governmental or local authority level. It was during this period of public ownership that the fluoridation schemes in the UK were introduced. On the basis that it was in the public's best interest, the water companies, both private and state owned, were persuaded to fluoridate water supplies. The companies were to fluoridate the water supply under a non-profit agreement whereby all appropriate costs were met by the state. However, a series of events in the 1980s changed the picture of water fluoridation with far reaching effects. The first of these events was a ruling given on a case before the Scottish judiciary.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Dental Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Up to 2 free articles per month
  • New content available