References

Kelleher MG, Djemal S, Al-Khayatt AS Bleaching and bonding for the older patient. Dent Update. 2011; 38(5):294-6 https://doi.org/10.12968/denu.2011.38.5.294
Sandler PJ, Madahar AK, Murray A. Anterior open bite: aetiology and management. Dent Update. 2011; 38:522-532 https://doi.org/10.12968/denu.2011.38.8.522
Reichert I, Figel P, Winchester L. Orthodontic treatment of anterior open bite: a review article – is surgery always necessary?. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014; 18:271-277 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-013-0430-5
Greenlee GM, Huang GJ, Chen SS Stability of treatment for anterior open-bite malocclusion: a meta-analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011; 139:154-169 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.10.019
Huang G, Baltuck C, Funkhouser E The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network Adult Anterior Open Bite Study: Treatment recommendations and their association with patient and practitioner characteristics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2019; 156:312-325 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.05.005
Fleming PS. Orthodontic treatment planning: can we plan for stability?. Br Dent J. 2021; 230:717-721 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-021-2891-5
Talic NF. Adverse effects of orthodontic treatment: a clinical perspective. Saudi Dent J. 2011; 23:55-59 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2011.01.003
Manfredini D, Lombardo L, Siciliani G. Temporomandibular disorders and dental occlusion. A systematic review of association studies: end of an era?. J Oral Rehabil. 2017; 44:908-923 https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12531
Ooi HL, Kelleher MGD. Instagram dentistry. Prim Dent J. 2021; 10:13-19 https://doi.org/10.1177/2050168420980964
Kelleher M. The ‘Uberization of orthodontics’–or how low can you go?. Orthod Update. 2017; 10:6-7
Ruparelia R, Kelleher MGD, Dhanda LS. Darwinian dentistry? Social media, smartphones and selfie sticks. Prim Dent J. 2022; 11:75-80 https://doi.org/10.1177/20501684221088434
Burke FJ, Kelleher MG. The ‘daughter test’ in elective esthetic dentistry. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2009; 21:143-146 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2009.00249.x

Anterior open bites: the additive direct resin composite solution

From Volume 50, Issue 1, January 2023 | Pages 9-17

Authors

Martin Kelleher

MSc, FDSRCS, FDSRCPS, FCGDent

Specialist in Restorative Dentistry and Prosthodontics, Consultant in Restorative Dentistry, King's College Dental Hospital

Articles by Martin Kelleher

Email Martin Kelleher

Khawer Ayub

BDS, MFDS RCPS(Glas)

BDS, MFDS RCSP(Glas), Specialty Registrar in Restorative Dentistry, King's College Hospital and William Harvey Hospital

Articles by Khawer Ayub

Email Khawer Ayub

Abstract

This article describes a clinically proven, pragmatic approach to managing anterior open bites (AOBs) by using additive, non-destructive, freehand direct resin composite bonding. Direct composite has been used by many clinicians to solve a multitude of clinical problems. The use of these techniques and the procedural aspects have been published extensively. However, in relationship to managing AOBs there appears to be an under-appreciation by some practitioners, as well as by some in the orthodontic and maxillofacial communities, of its pragmatic use for managing many AOBs, or about what additive direct resin composite bonding could offer those patients who enquire about their realistic options to deal with their perceived concerns.

CPD/Clinical Relevance: This article seeks to raise awareness about different ways of using direct resin composite bonding (‘bondodontics’) to manage many AOBs pragmatically, at very low risk and at reasonable costs.

Article

The available options for anterior open bites (AOBs) range from doing nothing, through to doing extensive, expensive and speculative treatments.

Variations of bonding direct composite have been devised by various clinicians to solve many clinical problems, using different techniques and processes, and these have been published widely.1 Using direct resin composite bonding to manage many anterior open bites is a useful and pragmatic clinical technique.

Orthodontics, on its own, or combined with facial surgery, are recognized approaches to managing AOB problems.2,3 However, Greenlee et al4 reported on the problems of relapse with different approaches. Huang et al5 described wide variations in the treatments offered for AOBs in different centres in the USA with many subjective, institutional, or commercial factors seemingly involved in the different orthodontic/orthognathic treatment decisions about managing AOBs. The many difficult issues associated with long-term retention, including when treating AOBs, have been reported extensively.6 The uncertainties and the possibilities of unsatisfactory long-term outcomes with orthodontics, as described by Talic in 2015,7 with or without jaw surgery, ought to be described candidly to any AOB patients, and/or their guardians, as part of good ‘Montgomery consent’ processes.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Dental Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Up to 2 free articles per month
  • New content available