References

Fuller E, Steele J, Watt R, Nuttall N Oral Health and Function: A report from the Adult Dental Health Survey 2009. The Information Centre for Health and Social Care. 2011; 7-8
Slot W, Raghoebar GM, Vissink A A systematic review of implant-supported maxillary overdentures after a mean observation period of at least 1 year. J Clin Periodont. 2010; 37:(1)98-110
Feine JS, Carlsson GE, Awad MA The McGill consensus statement on overdentures. Mandibular two-implant overdentures as first choice standard of care for edentulous patients. Montreal, Quebec, May 24–25, 2002. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2002; 17:(4)601-602
Thomason JM, Feine J, Exley C Mandibular two implant-supported overdentures as the first choice standard of care for edentulous patients – the York Consensus Statement. Br Dent J. 2009; 207:(4)185-186
Chan MFW-Y, Johnston C, Howell RA A retrospective study of the maintenance requirements associated with implant stabilized mandibular overdentures. Eur J Prothodont Restor Dent. 1996; 4:39-43
Walton JN, MacEntee MI A retrospective study on the maintenance and repair of implant-supported prostheses. Int J Prosthodont. 1993; 6:451-455
Fromentin O, Lassauzay C, Nader SA Clinical wear of overdenture ball attachments after 1, 3 and 8 years. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011; 22:(11)1270-1274

Chairside assessment of implant-retained overdenture retention

From Volume 43, Issue 5, June 2016 | Pages 496-497

Authors

Lyndsey Webb

BDS(Hons), MJDF RCS(Eng)

Specialty Registrar in Restorative Dentistry, Leeds Dental Institute

Articles by Lyndsey Webb

J Mark Thomason

BDS, PhD, FDS RCS(Ed)

Professor of Prosthodontics and Oral Rehabilitation, Associate Dean for Clinical Development Faculty of Medicine, Newcastle University Dental Hospital, Richardson Road, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4AZ, UK

Articles by J Mark Thomason

Article

Edentulous patients are demanding higher levels of comfort and functionality, and are looking to implant-retained overdentures to provide stability. However, all components experience wear through use and it can sometimes be difficult to identify whether the wear has occurred to the attachment or the retainer. Accurately diagnosing the cause of the loss of retention is important from a patient satisfaction and financial viewpoint. This simple diagnostic method for assessment of the wear of an implant-retained overdenture using an analogue of a ball abutment will reduce perceived levels of complexity of routine maintenance treatments.

The prevalence of edentulism continues to fall in western society. Between 1998 and 2009, the overall level of edentulism has more than halved from 13% to 6%, demonstrating that this is a current and relevant changing pattern in oral health status within the population.1

Implant-retained overdentures rely on both the denture-bearing area and the implants for support and retention. Maxillary dentures are commonly supported by four or six implants,2 whilst mandibular dentures more usually may only have two implants.3,4 Commonly, ball or bar abutments are attached to the implants, and clips or ‘O’-ring matrices are embedded into the fitting surface of the denture.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Dental Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Up to 2 free articles per month
  • New content available