References

Romero-Maroto M, Santos-Puerta N. The impact of dental appearance and anxiety on self-esteem in adult orthodontic patients. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2015; 18:143-155
Bello A, Jarvis RH. A review of esthetic alternatives for the restoration of anterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1997; 78:437-440
Claman L, Alfaro MA. An interdisciplinary approach for improved esthetic results in the anterior maxilla. J Prosthet Dent. 2003; 89:1-5
Ittipuriphat I, Leevailoj C. Anterior space management: interdisciplinary concepts. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2013; 25:16-30 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2012.00515.x
Demarco FF, Collares K. Should my composite restorations last forever? Why are they failing?. Braz Oral Res. 2017; 31
Devoto W, Saracinelli M, Manauta J. Composite in everyday practice: how to choose the right material and simplify application technics in anterior teeth. Eur J Esthet Dent. 2010; 5:102-124

Aesthetic smile makeover using direct composite restorations: A case report of interdental spacing and altered passive eruption

From Volume 48, Issue 2, February 2021 | Pages 145-147

Authors

Tal Ziv

BMedSc, DMD

Aesthetic and digital dentistry, Tel Aviv, Israel

Articles by Tal Ziv

Email Tal Ziv

Abstract

Interdental space between anterior teeth is an aesthetic and a phonetic problem. While various treatment options are available, patients often have concerns regarding treatment invasiveness, duration of treatments, costs and long-term prognosis. This case report describes a step-by-step smile makeover with direct composite restorations in maxillary incisors and canines with interdental spaces, tooth size discrepancy and altered passive eruption.

CPD/Clinical Relevance: Minimally invasive dentistry is an integral component of contemporary clinical practice With recent advances in innovative materials and improved clinical technique, attaining aesthetic results with a minimally invasive approach is highly achievable.

Article

Interdental spacing between anterior teeth is an aesthetic and a phonetic problem.1 In the era of Facebook, Instagram and selfie photography, more patients are seeking aesthetic dental treatments. While various treatment options are available, patients often have concerns regarding treatment invasiveness, duration of treatments, costs and long-term prognosis.2

The appearance of a smile is influenced by the coronal proportion (width and length) and the teeth-smile-face relationship.3 This relationship must be considered when diastema closure is performed. Both the orthodontic and prosthodontic fields offer several treatment options for diastema closure, with several differences between them. In cases of aesthetic defects and/or discrepancies in tooth size, orthodontic treatment alone will not solve the aesthetic problem.4

Within the prosthodontic field, the direct restorative approach is the most minimally invasive and cost effective. It is highly efficient and easily altered and maintained.5 Direct composite restorations permit changes of tooth size, shape, colour and inclination, and can be performed using a minimally invasive approach.6 Furthermore, when possible, original tooth structure may be preserved, making the treatment reversible.2

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Dental Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Up to 2 free articles per month
  • New content available