View more from Listerine
Switch to Dark theme

References

Morley J, Eubank J. Macroesthetic elements of smile design. J Am Dent Assoc. 2001; 132:39-44
Miller EL, Bodden WR, Jamison HC. A study of the relationship of the dental midline to the facial median line. J Prosthet Dent. 1979; 41:657-660
Beyer JW, Lindauer SJ. Evaluation of dental midline position. Semin Orthod. 1998; 4:146-152
Latta GH. The midline and its relation to anatomic landmarks in the edentulous patient. J Prosthet Dent. 1988; 59:681-683
Madison, Wis: American Academy of Cosmetic Dentistry; 1999
Morley J. A multidisciplinary approach to complex aesthetics restoration with diagnostic planning. Prac Perio Aesth Dent. 2000; 12:575-577
Lombardi RE. The principles of visual perception and their clinical application to denture esthetics. J Prosthet Dent. 1973; 29:358-382
Hancher P. Orthodontics for esthetic dentistry Part 1. J Cosmetic Dent. 2005; 20:80-92
Kameyama T, Matsumoto Y, Warita H, Soma K.Japan: Tokyo Medical and Dental University; 2003
Linge BO, Linge L. Apical root resorption in upper anterior teeth. Eur J Orthod. 1983; 5:(3)173-183 https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/5.3.173
Kumasako-Haga T, Kanoo T, Hayashi H. Effect of 8-hour intermittent orthodontic force on osteoclasts and root resorption. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009; 135
El-Mangoury NH, Moussa M, Mostafa Y, Girgis A. In vivo remineralization after air-rotor stripping. J Clin Orthod. 1991; 25:(2)75-78
Radlanski R. Morphology of interdentally stripped enamel one year after treatment. J Clin Orthod. 1991; 23:(11)748-750
Heins PJ, Thomas RG, Newton JW. The relationship of interradicular width and bone loss. J Periodont. 1988; 59:(2)73-79
Tal H. Relationship between the interproximal distance of roots and the prevalence on intrabony pockets. J Periodont. 1984; 55:(10)604-607
Case CS. Principles of retention in orthodontia. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003; 124:(4)352-361
Little RM, Reidel RA, Artun J. An evaluation of changes in mandibular anterior alignment from 10 to 20 years post retention. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1988; 93:423-428
Blake M, Bibby K. Retention and relapse: a review of the literature. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998; 114:299-306
Becker A, Goultschin J. The multistrand retainer and splint. Am J Orthod. 1984; 85:470-474
Hadad R, Hobson RS, McCabe JF. Micro-tensile bond strength to surface and subsurface enamel. Dent Mater. 2006; 22:(9)870-874

Minimally invasive cosmetic dentistry: alignment, bleaching and bonding (abb)

From Volume 38, Issue 9, November 2011 | Pages 586-592

Authors

Tif Qureshi

President, The British Academy of Cosmetic Dentistry

Articles by Tif Qureshi

Abstract

This article will outline how combining existing techniques in a new and unique manner can potentially redefine the traditional approach to smile design planning and execution. Alignment, tooth whitening and edge bonding with new highly polishable nano-hybrid composites can make cosmetic dentistry far simpler and less invasive. Patients' perceptions of their end smile result can change dramatically if they are allowed to see their teeth improve gradually.

Clinical Relevance: This technique will highlight a choice of pathways available in cosmetic dentistry making it much less invasive for the patient and less risky for dentists.

Article

The United Kingdom has seen a large increase in the demand and provision of cosmetic dentistry over the last 10 years.

Smile Design Principles have provided a format for dentists and orthodontists to create what has been widely accepted as an aesthetic target to achieve in the treatments of their patients.

Smile design theory can be broken down into four components:1

Facial aesthetics forms the frame of the smile with the lips and surrounding soft tissues, which vary from patient to patient and can change depending on various positions of speech and when smiling or laughing.

Gingival aesthetics particularly relates to gum health. Unhealthy and inflamed gums may be generally considered unaesthetic. Too much gum display is also sometimes considered unaesthetic, even if the gums are healthy and pink.

Microaesthetics relates to specific anatomical details that characterize teeth, such as surface contour and texture, incisal translucency, halo effect.

The macroaesthetic requirements for smile design theory may be considered to encapsulate several requirements to achieve what is arguably a correct aesthetic smile.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Dental Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Up to 2 free articles per month
  • New content available

Already have an account? Sign in here