References

Silverstone LM. Dental caries: the problem. Dent Update. 1973; 1:19-26
Fejerskov O, Nyvad B. Is dental caries an infectious disease? Diagnostic and treatment consequences for the practitioner. In: Schou L (ed). Copenhagen: Quintessence Publishing; 2003
Fejerskov O. Concepts of dental caries and their consequences for understanding the disease. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1997; 25:5-12
Black GV.Chicago, IL: Medico-Dental Publishing Co; 1908
Marsh PD, Nyvad B. The oral microflora and biofilms on teeth. In: Fejerskov O, Kidd E (eds). Oxford: Blackwell Munksgaard; 2008
Kidd EAM. Should deciduous teeth be restored? Reflections of a cariologist. Dent Update. 2012; 39:159-166
Elderton RJ. Preventive (evidence based) approach to quality dental care. Med Princ Pract. 2001; 12:12-21
Bille J, Thylstrup A. Radiographic diagnosis and clinical tissue changes in relation to treatment of approximal carious lesions. Caries Res. 1982; 16:1-6
Ricketts D. The eyes have it. How good is DIAGNOdent at detecting caries?. Evid Based Dent. 2005; 6:64-65
Ekstrand KR, Christiansen ME. Outcomes of a non-operative treatment program for children and adolescents. Caries Res. 2005; 39:455-457
Page J, Kidd E. Practical suggestions for implementing caries control and recall protocols for children and young adults. Dent Update. 2010; 37:422-432
Hausen H. Caries prediction. In: Fejerskov O, Kidd E (eds). Oxford: Blackwell Munksgaard; 2008
Fejerskov O, Thylstrup A, Larsen ML. Rational use of fluorides in caries prevention. A concept based on possible cariostatic mechanisms. Acta Odont Scand. 1981; 39:241-249
Kalsbeek H, Verrips E, Dirks OB. Use of fluoride tablets and effect on prevalence of dental caries and dental fluorosis. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1992; 20:241-245
Nadanovsky P, Sheiham A. Relative contribution of dental services to the changes in caries levels in 12-year-old children in 18 industrialized countries in the 1970's and early 1980's. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1995; 23:331-339
Qvist V. Longevity of restorations: the ‘death spiral’. In: Fejerskov O, Kidd E (eds). Oxford: Blackwell Munksgaard; 2008
Carroll L. The Walrus and the Carpenter.London: MacMillan & Co; 1871
Baelum V. Caries management: technical solutions to biological problems or evidence-based care?. J Oral Rehab. 2008; 35:135-151

Changing concepts in cariology: forty years on

From Volume 40, Issue 4, May 2013 | Pages 277-286

Authors

Edwina Kidd

Professor of Cariology, Guy's, King's and St. Thomas' Schools of Medicine, Dentistry & Biomedical Sciences, Floor 25, Guy's Tower, Guy's Hospital, London Bridge, London SE1 9RT

Articles by Edwina Kidd

Abstract

The caries lesion is a sign or symptom resulting from numerous pH fluctuations in biofilms on teeth. The lesion may or may not progress and lesion progression can be controlled, slowed down or arrested. Control of the biofilm is the treatment of caries, the most important measure being to disturb the biofilm mechanically using a fluoride-containing toothpaste. The informed patient controls caries and the role of the dental professional is to advise how this should be done. This is the non-operative treatment of caries and it is worthy of payment. It should be mandatory as part of any operative treatment to ensure that the patient understands, and is able to perform, adequate plaque control.

Clinical Relevance: It is very unfortunate that the current remuneration scheme (Unit of Dental Activity) in Health Service practice in England and Wales prevents practitioners adopting a modern biological approach to caries control.

Article

Forty years on, when afar and asunder Parted are those who are reading today, When you look back, and forgetfully wonder What you were like in your work and your play, Then, it may be, there will often come o'er you, Glimpses of past and some of it wrong, Visions of studies shall float them before you, Echoes of teaching shall bear you along, What is new for the patient our hope to fulfil, Teeth unto death are chiefly our will. (With apologies to Edward Ernest Bowen and Harrow School.)

Edwina Kidd was in the staff room at the London Hospital Dental School when Ted Renson carried in his baby, Dental Update, Volume 1, Number 1. It was a revelation to see such a beautifully produced, colour illustrated and readily understandable production. The cariology article in that first number concerned the white spot lesion and was written by Leon Silverstone.1 The authors of the current paper (EK and OF) met in Leon's laboratory (a euphemism for a large cupboard) at the London Hospital at that time. One (EK) was a junior lecturer at The London whose PhD Leon was supervising; the other (OF), already a Professor of Oral Pathology in Denmark, had recently been appointed to a chair in Cariology and needed to change research focus from soft to hard tissues. He was in London to research aspects of fluorosis and work with Leon, Newell Johnson and Ron Fearnhead. Having met in a long, thin cupboard, where communication was inevitable, we subsequently worked together for 40 years (Figure 1). We now combine in this anniversary issue to take a helicopter journey over contemporary Cariology, discussing aspects of the subject as understood in 2013 and highlighting changes in understanding from the 1970s.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Dental Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Up to 2 free articles per month
  • New content available