Algaithy RA, Qualtrough JE. Pulp sensibility and vitality tests for diagnosing pulpal health in permanent teeth: a critical review. Int Endod J. 2017; 50:135-142
Kqiku L, Sivic E, Weiglein A, Stadtler P. Position of the mental foramen: an anatomical study. Wien Med Wochenschr. 2011; 161:272-273
Kakehashi S, Stanley HR, Fitzgerald RJ. The effects of surgical exposures of dental pulps in germ-free and conventional laboratory rats. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1965; 20:340-349
Siqueira JF, Rocas IN. Microbiology and treatment of acute apical abscesses. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2013; 26:255-273
Levitan ME, Himel VT. Dens evaginatus: literature review, pathophysiology, and comprehensive treatment regimen. J Endod. 2006; 32:1-9
An apical abscess associated with a caries free and unrestored tooth (virgin tooth) is uncommon. This may present diagnostic challenges and risk in general dental practice. The following report illustrates the diagnostic challenges and the initial management of pain in the case described.
CPD/Clinical Relevance: Patients presenting with endodontic pain should be examined carefully, with particular reference to radiographic exposure of suspect teeth. Dentists should come to a presumptive diagnosis only after such careful examination and not make assumptions based on either a tooth of apparent integrity or, alternatively, heavily restored in nature.
Article
This is a case report of a patient presenting in pain of two-weeks' duration localized to the lower right premolar region. Whilst the LR5 was heavily restored, the adjacent unrestored LR4 was tender to percussion. This case report presents the clinical management of diagnosis and treatment of an apical abscess at an apparently sound virgin premolar tooth. The authors discuss how they made a differential diagnosis and the likely reasons for disease arising.
A 67-year-old female patient with type II diabetes presented with a constant dull ache localized to the LR45. The pain radiated through the right-hand side of the mandible, keeping the patient awake at night. There was no associated suppuration or sinus tracts. The LR5 had a large distal occlusal (DO) amalgam and was not tender to percussion. The virgin LR4 was tender to percussion. The patient could not differentiate the pain between the two teeth. The LR4 appeared free from any restoration or dental caries (Figure 1). Clinical examination did not reveal discoloration of either tooth. There was no mobility nor was there any periodontal pocketing greater than 3 mm. Sensibility testing with both ethyl chloride and electric pulp tester of the LR45 showed a positive but not exaggerated response at LR5 and no response at LR4.
Register now to continue reading
Thank you for visiting Dental Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits: