Abstract
Second phase patient survey audit results were reviewed for 41 practices. Five of the six practices with the lowest first phase results achieved significantly improved results in the second phase. The average increase in a patient perception index between phase 1 and phase 2 for these 6 practices was 6 points. The average increase was only 1 point for the other 39 practices. The five practices recording significantly improved patient perceptions all reported that significant practice development had been taking place between the phase 1 and phase 2 audits. For 3 of these 5 practices their first phase audit result had been a significant inspiration for the practice development. It seems that this patient survey instrument may be inspiring significant development when practices score notably below the benchmark.