References

Elliott E, Sanger E, Shiers D, Aggarwal VR. Why does patient mental health matter? Part 3: dental self-neglect as a consequence of psychiatric conditions. Dent Update. 2022; 49:867-871
King E, Patel R, Patel A, Addy L. Should implants be considered for patients with periodontal disease?. Br Dent J. 2016; 221:705-711 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2016.905
Bain CA, Moy PK. The association between the failure of dental implants and cigarette smoking. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1993; 8:609-615
Ferreira SD, Martins CC, Amaral SA Periodontitis as a risk factor for peri-implantitis: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. J Dent. 2018; 79:1-10 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2018.09.010
Dragan IF, Pirc M, Rizea C A global perspective on implant education: cluster analysis of the “first dental implant experience” of dentists from 84 nationalities. Eur J Dent Educ. 2019; 23:251-265 https://doi.org/10.1111/eje.12426
Burke FJT. Advertising lies. Dent Update. 2019; 46:605-606

Still advertising lies

From Volume 49, Issue 11, December 2022 | Pages 863-864

Authors

FJ Trevor Burke

DDS, MSc, MDS, MGDS, FDS (RCS Edin), FDS RCS (Eng), FCG Dent, FADM,

Articles by FJ Trevor Burke

Article

I may or may not be reading the right type of newspaper (if and when I have time!), therefore I may or may not be reading the right type of advertising! I refer specifically to half page advertising (which, my analysis indicates, costs in the region of £30,000) promising comfortable, long-lasting dental implant treatment, be that single tooth, all on four, or alternatives, for patients whose mouths are neglected and, in most cases, as far as I could judge from the illustrations, riddled with periodontal disease. If we read the article by Emma Elliot and colleagues1 in the current issue, then there is a possibility that such patients may have a psychiatric self-neglect problem, which is the first thing that may make them unsuitable for (implant) treatment, which readers will know involves meticulous home and professional aftercare. Add to that that the research is loud and clear that dental implants do not perform optimally when placed in the mouths of patients who have existing or pre-existing periodontal disease2 or in smokers.3 This is confirmed by a recently published systematic review by Ferreira and co-workers, who identified 1823 articles and included 19 cross-sectional, case-control and cohort studies.4 They concluded that the presence or history of periodontal disease was a potential risk factor for various complications in implant therapy, with an increased risk of 2.3 times, including an increased risk of marginal bone loss, implant loss and the occurrence of peri-implantitis (a condition that is notoriously difficult to correct), which may jeopardize the longevity of dental implants. They advised that individuals with active periodontitis should undergo effective periodontal therapy prior to implant rehabilitation in order to reduce the risk of developing peri-implantitis. In addition, individuals with a history of periodontitis, rehabilitated with implants, should remain in a rigorous maintenance programme due to their susceptibility. Do the potential patients responding to the aforementioned advertising understand any of this?

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Dental Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Up to 2 free articles per month
  • New content available