References

Burke FJT. The genesis of minimal cavity design. Dent Update. 2019; 46:705-706
Elderton RJ. Restorative dentistry: 1: Current thinking on cavity design. Dent Update. 1986; 13:113-122
Renson E. The mercury hazard in dentistry. Dent Update. 1986; 3:5-6
Langdon JD. Current thinking in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Part 1. Dent Update. 1986; 13:29-37
Langdon JD. Current thinking in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Part 2. Dent Update. 1986; 13:61-77
Franks AST. Gerodontics: a challenge to dentistry. Dent Update. 1986; 13:223-226
Elderton RJ. Restorative dentistry: 2: Prospects for the future. Dent Update. 1986; 13:161-168
Burke FJT, Lucarotti PSK. The ultimate guide to restoration longevity in England and Wales. Part 4: Resin composite restorations: time to next intervention and to extraction of the restored tooth. Br Dent J. 2018; 224:945-956
Lewis MAO, Lamey P-J. The tongue: 6. White patches. Dent Update. 1986; 13:39-44
Burke FJT. Posterior composites: the current status. Dent Update. 1986; 13:227-240
Renson E. Comment: Advertising and dentistry. Dent Update. 1986; 13:57-58
Renson E. Comment: The GDC and advertising: a prophesy fulfilled. Dent Update. 1986; 13:311-312
O.Malley C. Guest editorial: Fifty lashes by the GDC – time for change at the GDC?. Dent Update. 2020; 47:7-12

Yesterday, now, or tomorrow?

From Volume 47, Issue 3, March 2020 | Pages 181-182

Authors

Article

While researching a recent editorial1 on contemporary cavity design and, in particular, the designs suggested by Richard Elderton,2 I happened upon volume 13 of Dental Update, published throughout 1986. Of particular interest to me was the discovery of the occasional series entitled ‘Dentistry in the year 2000’, not simply because I wanted to glean if there was any truth in the predictions 14 years on (1986 to 2000), but also to ascertain if there was anything which might have pointed readers towards the year 2020. However, it was not solely the ‘2000’ series that took my eye but also the Editorial Comments by Ted Renson.

Readers will be interested to note that, as long ago as 1986, he wrote about the ‘Mercury hazard in dentistry’,3 occasioned by media reports that mercury-containing restorations might be harmful to patients, but pointing out that, if mercury toxicity was a problem, then dental workers and patients (whose life-time exposure to mercury is 10,000 times that of the general population) would have experienced symptoms, which was not the case. Following the Minamata Agreement in 2013, this remains a relevant topic in 2020.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Dental Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Up to 2 free articles per month
  • New content available