References

Shillingburg HT, Wilson EL, Morrison JT., 3rd edn. London: Quintessence Publishing Co Ltd; 2000
Ney JM.Connecticut, USA: JM Ney Co; 1964
Magne P. A new approach to the learning of dental morphology, function, and esthetics: the ‘2D-3D-4D’ concept. Int J Esthet Dent. 2015; 10:32-47
Jelenko JF., 5th edn. New York, USA: JF Jelenko & Co Inc; 1965
Linek HA.Pasadena, USA: Wood and Jones; 1949
Zeisz RC, Nuckolls J.St Louis, USA: Mosby; 1949
Van Beek GC., 2nd edn. Philadelphia, USA: Wright Elsevier; 1983
Ness JC.CA, USA: Productivity Training Corporation; 2009
Wheeler's Dental Anatomy, Physiology and Occlusion, 9th edn. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier; 2010
Goodacre CJ., 2nd edn. Connecticut, USA: People's Medical Publishing House; 2012
Miller K.Germany: TW Media; 2017
Wolpoff MH.Cleveland and London: The Press of Case Western Reserve University; 1971
Thomas PK.San Diego, USA: Instant Printing Service; 1967
Schultz D.London: Quintessence Publishing Co Ltd; 2014
Kilistoff AJ, Mackenzie L, D'Eon M, Trinder K. Efficacy of a step-by-step carving technique for dental students. J Dent Educ. 2013; 77:63-67
Childers JM. Occlusal morphology as it relates to carving amalgam or waxing occlusal surfaces. Oper Dent. 1983; 8:64-66
Solow RA. Standardized sequence for carving and finishing amalgam restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 1981; 46:519-524
Arnault FD. Carving amalgam. Oral Health. 1985; 75:47-49
Kilistoff A. A systematic technique for carving amalgam and composite restorations. Oper Dent. 2011; 36:335-339
Liebenberg WH. Successive cusp build-up: an improved placement technique for posterior direct resin restorations. J Can Dent Assoc. 1996; 62:501-507
Mazik CA. Simplified occlusal anatomy for posterior composites. J Esthet Dent. 1992; 4:8-10
Mackenzie L, Shortall ACC, Burke FJT. Direct posterior composites: a practical guide. Dent Update. 2009; 36:71-80
: Dentistry; Federation Dentaire International (FDI);

Tooth anatomy: A practical guide part 1: drawing posterior teeth

From Volume 44, Issue 8, September 2017 | Pages 697-712

Authors

Louis Mackenzie

BDS, FDS RCPS FCGDent, Head Dental Officer, Denplan UK, Andover

General Dental Practitioner, Birmingham; Clinical Lecturer, University of Birmingham School of Dentistry, Birmingham, UK.

Articles by Louis Mackenzie

Abstract

Abstract: Understanding the anatomy of anterior and posterior teeth is important as the main aims of restorative dentistry are to restore the form, function and the aesthetics of damaged teeth. The anatomy of individual teeth is complex and infinitely variable, making it difficult to learn and challenging to teach. As tooth anatomy programs often occur in the early part of pre-clinical training it may also be difficult for clinical students to recall anatomical principles and apply them later to restorative treatment.

This paper is the first of two describing an innovative method of teaching and learning tooth anatomy that includes a program of step-by-step drawing exercises. The posterior tooth drawing exercises described here and the anterior versions in part two were originally designed for undergraduates studying tooth anatomy for the first time. Since their inception these exercises have also proved popular with experienced clinicians aiming to refine their dental anatomical knowledge for application in restorative procedures.

CPD/Clinical Relevance: Detailed understanding of tooth anatomy will help clinicians to plan, accurately and predictably, the restoration of posterior and anterior teeth.

Article

Most undergraduate curricula provide tooth anatomy teaching as a compulsory component of preclinical training.

Although anatomical complexity and variation make it a difficult subject to learn, most undergraduate programs aim to teach students basic shapes and predictable patterns so that they can recognize individual teeth and compare them to each other.

Often the teaching of tooth anatomy and clinical training are separated by months or even years, making it challenging for students to apply previously learned anatomical principles to restorative procedures.1

If tooth anatomy is not mastered during undergraduate training there is a risk that students may graduate with limited skills in the accurate shaping of direct restorations and in designing fixed and removable prosthodontic restorations so that they integrate functionally and aesthetically with the residual dentition.

In 2009, a review of the second year undergraduate curriculum at the University of Birmingham School of Dentistry provided the opportunity to redesign tooth anatomy teaching with a greater restorative focus. This paper is the first of a two-part series describing the innovative tooth drawing exercises that form an integral component of the program.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Dental Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Up to 2 free articles per month
  • New content available