References

Horner K, O'Malley L, Taylor K, Glenny A-M. Guidelines for clinical use of CBCT: a review. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol. 2015; 44
Ludlow JB, Timothy R, Walker C, Hunter R, Benavides E, Samuelson DB Effective dose of dental CBCT – a meta analysis of published data and additional data for nine CBCT units. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol. 2015; 44
Pauwels R, Araki K, Siewerdsen JH, Thongvigitmanee SS. Technical aspects of dental CBCT: state of the art. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2015; 44
The Ionising Radiation (Medical Exposure) Regulations 2000 (together with notes on good practice). https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/227075/IRMER_regulations_2000.pdf (cited 2017 Mar 3)
Dawood A, Patel S, Brown J. Cone beam CT in dental practice. Br Dent J. 2009; 207:23-28
National Radiological Protection Board. Membership of the Working Party for producing the Guidance Notes for Dental Practitioners on the Safe Use of X-Ray Equipment. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/337178/misc_pub_DentalGuidanceNotes.pdf (cited 2017 Mar 3)
Cone Beam CT for Dental and Maxillofacial Radiology Evidence-Based Guidelines. Directorate-General for Energy Directorate D – Nuclear Energy Unit D4 – Radiation Protection 2012 2. 2012. http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/euratom/ (cited 2017 Jul 9)
HPA Working Party on Dental Cone Beam CT Equipment. Guidance on the Safe Use of Dental Cone Beam CT (Computed Tomography) Equipment. TABLE 1 Typical patient doses from x-ray examinations of the head. 2010. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/340159/HPA-CRCE-010_for_website.pdf (cited 2017 Mar 3)
The Radiation Protection Implications of the Use of Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) in Dentistry – What You Need To Know. 2009. https://www.liverpool.ac.uk/~ppnixon/hpaguidance.pdf (cited 2017 Jul 3)
Nemtoi A, Czink C, Haba D, Gahleitner A. Cone beam CT: a current overview of devices. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2013; 42
Prospects and challenges of rendering tissue density in Hounsfield units for cone beam computed tomography. 2013. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2212440313001958 (cited 2017 Mar 3)
Cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) imaging of the oral and maxillofacial region: a systematic review of the literature. 2009. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19464146 (cited 2017 Mar 3)
Effective dose from cone beam CT examinations in dentistry. 2009. http://www.birpublications.org/doi/10.1259/bjr/31419627 (cited 2017 Mar 3)
Makins SR. Artifacts interfering with interpretation of cone beam computed tomography images. Dent Clin North Am. 2014; 58:485-495
Dahmani-Causse M, Marx M, Deguine O, Fraysse B, Lepage B, Escudé B. Morphologic examination of the temporal bone by cone beam computed tomography: comparison with multislice helical computed tomography. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 2011; 128:230-235
Osgood GM, Thawait GK, Hafezi-Nejad N, Shakoor D, Shaner A, Yorkston J Image quality of cone beam computed tomography for evaluation of extremity fractures in the presence of metal hardware: visual grading characteristics analysis. Br J Radiol. 2017; 90:(1073)
Benavides E, Rios HF, Ganz SD, An C-H, Resnik R, Reardon GT Use of cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: the International Congress of Oral Implantologists consensus report. Implant Dent. 2012; 21:78-86
Goiato MC, Pellizzer EP, Moreno A, Gennari-Filho H, dos Santos DM, Santiago JF Implants in the zygomatic bone for maxillary prosthetic rehabilitation: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014; 43:748-757
Isaacson KG, Thom AR, Atack NE, Horner K, Whaites E. Guidelines for the Use of Radiographs in Clinical Orthodontics, 4th edn. London: BOS; 2015
Makdissi J. Cone beam CT in orthodontics: the current picture. Int Orthod. 2013; 11:1-20
Patel S, Durack C, Abella F, Roig M, Shemesh H European Society of Endodontology position statement: the use of CBCT in endodontics. Int Endod J. 2014; 47:502-504
Brown J, Jacobs R, Levring Jäghagen E, Lindh C, Baksi G, Schulze D, Schulze R. Basic training requirements for the use of dental CBCT by dentists: a position paper prepared by the European Academy of DentoMaxilloFacial Radiology. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2014; 43
Horner K, Islam M, Flygare L, Tsiklakis K, Whaites E. Basic principles for use of dental cone beam computed tomography: consensus guidelines of the European Academy of Dental and Maxillofacial Radiology. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2009; 38:187-195

Cone beam computed tomography: an update for general dental practitioners

From Volume 45, Issue 4, April 2018 | Pages 329-338

Authors

Freya Smith-Jack

BDS, MFDS

Dental and Maxillofacial Radiology Specialty Registrar, Bristol Dental Hospital, Lower Maudlin Street, Bristol BS1 2LY, UK

Articles by Freya Smith-Jack

Rebecca Davies

BChD, MFDS RCS, MSc DDR

SpR Dental and Maxillofacial Radiology, Bristol and Birmingham

Articles by Rebecca Davies

Abstract

Abstract: As medical imaging becomes more advanced, Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) is increasingly used in general dental practice to aid diagnosis and treatment planning. Uses are varied and range from implant planning, endodontic treatment planning, to facial reconstruction. This article aims to give an overview of the legislation, scanner types, advantages and pitfalls of CBCT imaging.

CPD/Clinical Relevance: Cone beam CT imaging is becoming a widely used tool for imaging the dentition and facial bones. Justification and optimization of this imaging technique requires knowledge of the radiography of CBCT imaging, and the pros and cons of this technique.

Article

Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) first became commercially available in the early 2000s and has revolutionized the practice of dental and maxillofacial radiology. When three-dimensional imaging is required of the teeth and jaws, CBCT is often the modality of choice within both the primary and secondary dental care setting.1 The aim of this article is to provide the general dental practitioner with information on relevant legislation, CBCT equipment, and the advantages and disadvantages of the technique. In addition, indications and contra-indications, image interpretation and training requirements will be discussed.

CBCT utilizes a pyramidal-shaped X-ray beam rotating around the patient to gather information which is reconstructed into a cylindrical 3D image. Scan parameters that can be changed include the field of view (FOV), pixel (voxel) size (0.075 mm–0.4 mm), scan time, the degree of X-ray beam rotation (360° or 180°), X-ray tube potential (kilovoltage, kV) and X-ray tube current (milliamperage, mA). Changing these parameters can affect the image resolution and the patient dose.2,3 Scanning parameters are dependent on the indication for irradiation and should be assessed and justified on an individual basis. The Ionizing Radiation (Medical Exposure) Regulations 2000 IR(ME)R As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA) principle should be applied to all ionizing radiation exposures.4,5

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Dental Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Up to 2 free articles per month
  • New content available