References

Makdissi J, Loughlin A, Dungarwalla MM. Do something or do nothing? Anatomical variants and incidental findings on cone beam CT. Part 1. Dent Update. 2022; 49:95-101
Bukhari J, Mahdian M, Colosi D. Carotid artery calcifications detected by cbct in patients with a history of hypertension. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2019; 128
Fanning NF, Walters TD, Fox AJ, Symons SP. Association between calcification of the cervical carotid artery bifurcation and white matter ischemia. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006; 27:378-383
Khongkhunthian P, Reichart PA. Aspergillosis of the maxillary sinus as a complication of overfilling root canal material into the sinus: report of two cases. J Endod. 2001; 27:476-478 https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200107000-00011
Sedghizadeh PP, Nguyen M, Enciso R. Intracranial physiological calcifications evaluated with cone beam CT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2012; 41:675-678 https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/33077422
Varley EW. Rhinolith – an incidental finding. Br J Oral Surg. 1964; 2:40-43 https://doi.org/10.1016/s0007-117x(64)80007-x
Appleton SS, Kimbrough RE, Engstrom HI. Rhinolithiasis: a review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1988; 65:693-698 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(88)90012-6
Jadu FM, Lam EW. A comparative study of the diagnostic capabilities of 2D plain radiograph and 3D cone beam CT sialography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2013; 42 https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20110319
Barghan S, Tahmasbi Arashlow M, Nair MK. Incidental findings on cone beam computed tomography studies outside of the maxillofacial skeleton. Int J Dent. 2016; 2016 https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/9196503

Do Something or Do Nothing? Anatomical Variants and Incidental Findings on Cone Beam CT. Part 2: Beyond the Dento-alveolar Complex and Neighbouring Structures

From Volume 49, Issue 3, March 2022 | Pages 198-202

Authors

Jimmy Makdissi

DDS, MMedSc, FDS RCS(Eng), DDRRCR, FHEA

Clinical Senior Lecturer and Honorary Consultant, Dental and Maxillofacial Radiology, Institute of Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London and Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, The Royal London Dental Hospital; Clinical Director, JM Radiology CBCT Training

Articles by Jimmy Makdissi

Email Jimmy Makdissi

Amanda Loughlin

BDS, MFDS, DDMFR

Consultant in Dental and Maxillofacial Radiology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London

Articles by Amanda Loughlin

Ashok Adams

MRCP, FRCR

Consultant Neuroradiologist, Barts Health NHS Trust, London

Articles by Ashok Adams

Mohammed M Dungarwalla

BDS(Hons), MSc, MFDS, RCSEd, PGCert (MedEd), PGCert (ClinRes), MOral Surg, RCSEd FHEA.

Specialist in Oral Surgery, Institute of Dentistry, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, The Royal London Hospital

Articles by Mohammed M Dungarwalla

Abstract

Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is a popular and often indispensable imaging modality used for the dento-alveolar tissues and immediate surrounding structures. It can be used across several dental disciplines including endodontics, implant planning, oral surgery and orthodontics. Furthermore, it is commonly used in the medical specialties of oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS) and ear, nose and throat (ENT) surgery. In part 1 of this series, we described some of the common incidental findings found in the dento-alveolar complex and immediate neighbouring structures. Part 2 looks further afield and depicts some common and important incidental findings and anatomical variants that can be found on larger fields of view.

CPD/Clinical Relevance: Many incidental findings are innocuous, yet their recognition and documentation are essential because some will warrant medical or surgical intervention.

Article

In Part 1 of this series,1 the authors illustrated some of the more common incidental findings and anatomical variants found on smaller cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) volumes. Part 2 of this series focuses on the structures beyond the dento-alveolar tissues and the immediate surrounding structures. It also includes some of the less common incidental findings and variants that deserve mention due to their proposed management.

Importantly, some of the findings presented may be beyond the scope for interpretation of the dental practitioner, and onward referral of images for a specialist opinion may be required. Structures potentially included in the imaging field of view include the temporomandibular joints, major salivary glands, cervical spine, skull base, neck ligaments and vasculature. As in Part 1, the entities are presented alphabetically.

Category: incidental finding.

Frequency: uncommon.

Symptoms: may be asymptomatic or non-specific nasal stuffiness, excess mucous production, throat-clearing and epistaxis.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Dental Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Up to 2 free articles per month
  • New content available