Thomason JM, Girdler NM, Kendal-Taylor P, Wastell H, Weddell A, Seymour RA An Investigation into the need for supplementary steroids in organ transplant patients undergoing gingival surgery. J Clin Periodont. 1999; 26:577-582
Hellstein JW, Marek CL Bisphosphonate osteochemocrosis (bis-phossy jaw): is this phossy jaw of the 21st century?. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005; 63:682-689
Khan A Osteonecrosis of the jaw and bisphosphonates. Br Med J. 2010; 340
Migliorati CA, Casigalia J, Epstein J, Jacobsen PL, Siegel MA, Woo SB Managing the care of patients with bisphosphonate-associated osteonecrosis: an American Academy of Oral Medicine position paper. J Am Dent Assoc. 2005; 136:1658-1668
Meechan JG, Seymour RAOxford: Oxford University Press; 2002
Worsley DJ, Jones K, Marshman Z Patients are asking about e-cigarettes. What do we tell them?. Br Dent J. 2014; 217:91-95
Brown S, Greenwood M, Meechan JG General medicine and surgery for dental practitioners 5: Psychiatric disorders. Br Dent J. 2010; 209:(1)11-16
Longmore M, Wilkinson I, Davidson E, Foulkes A, Mafi A, 8th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010
Dayer MJ, Jones S, Prendergast B, Baddour LM, Lockhart PB, Thornhill MH Incidence of infective endocarditis in England, 2000-13: a secular trend, interrupted time-series analysis. Lancet. 2014; pii
The starting point in the assessment and management of any patient is dependent on good history-taking. The main parts of the history-taking process well known to practitioners are the presenting complaint, the history of the presenting complaint and the current and past medical history. This paper concentrates on those aspects of the process that are particularly important to dental practitioners.
Clinical Relevance: The cornerstone of safe and effective patient management lies with the history. This paper describes various aspects of history-taking and highlights important areas.
Article
The main parts of a patient history are well established. It is important that practitioners follow a recognized systematic scheme of enquiry to minimize the risk of missing important information.
All dental practitioners are familiar with the main components of the history-taking process. The purpose of this paper is to revise those areas and add some context to some of the more important aspects and provide updates where appropriate.
The presenting complaint may best be expressed in the patient's own words. The information presented can then be summarized by the clinician.
A chronological approach should be used. As a minimum, the history of a presenting complaint should include the following:
In dental practice, the presenting complaint is often pain. A generic scheme of questions to assess the nature and severity of a patient's pain is shown as follows:
Generic questioning regarding major systems such as the cardiovascular or respiratory systems is often the way practitioners start obtaining a medical history. Questioning should then focus on specific disorders,1 such as asthma or other respiratory disorders, diabetes mellitus, epilepsy, hypertension or other cardiovascular problems (stroke, myocardial infarction, angina), hepatitis or jaundice. Positive responses should be followed-up by an assessment of the severity of the disorder, treatments used and their efficacy. Previous problems with the arrest of haemorrhage are worth specific enquiry. Table 1 highlights situations where the arrest of haemorrhage may be affected and implications for management.
Register now to continue reading
Thank you for visiting Dental Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits: