Brown NL, Jephcote VEL. Inaccurate dental charting in an audit of 1128 general dental practice records. Dent Update. 2017; 44:254-260 https://doi.org/10.12968/denu.2017.44.3.254
McKenna JJ, Jablonski NG, Fearnhead RW. A method of matching skulls with photographic portraits using landmarks and measurements of the dentition. J Forensic Sci. 1984; 29:787-797
McKenna J, Fearnhead R. Identification by photographic superimposition.London: Wright; 1992
De Angelis D, Cattaneo C, Grandi M. Dental superimposition: a pilot study for standardising the method. Int J Legal Med. 2007; 121:501-506 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-007-0198-y
Bollinger SA, Brumit PC, Schrader BA, Senn DR. GrinLine identification using digital imaging and Adobe Photoshop. J Forensic Sci. 2009; 54:422-427 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2008.00971.x
Silva RF, Franco A, Picoli FF Positive identification of skeletal remains combining smile photographs and forensic anthropology. A case report. J Forensic Res. 2015; 6
Silva RF, Franco A, Souza JB Human identification through the analysis of smile photographs. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 2015; 36:71-74 https://doi.org/10.1097/PAF.0000000000000148
Silva RF, Felter M, Tolentino PHMP Forensic importance of intraoral photographs for human identification in dental autopsies – a case report. Bioscience J. 2017; 33::1696-1700 https://doi.org/10.14393/BJ-v33n6a2017-38605
Miranda GE, Freitas SG, Maia LVA, Melani RFH. An unusual method of forensic human identification: use of selfie photographs. Forensic Sci Int. 2016; 263:e14-e17 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.04.028
Reesu GV, Woodsend B, Mânica S Automated Identification from Dental Data (AutoIDD): a new development in digital forensics. Forensic Sci Int. 2020; 309 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110218
Reesu GV, Mânica S, Revie GF Forensic dental identification using two-dimensional photographs of a smile and three-dimensional dental models: a 2D–3D superimposition method. Forensic Sci Int. 2020; 313 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110361
Morse GA, Haque MS, Sharland MR, Burke FJ. The use of clinical photography by UK general dental practitioners. Br Dent J. 2010; 208 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2010.2
Photography and three-dimensional digital scans for forensic human identification cases using odontology: five case studies Nathan Brown Lacie Bowen Matthew Bowen Gowri Vijay Reesu Dental Update 2024 50:7, 707-709.
Antemortem photographs can be useful for forensic odontology purposes. Five case studies demonstrate how antemortem photographs (including selfies and dental intra-oral photographs) and 3D scans have been used successfully in human identification. evidence, implementation is limited in the UK, and this appears to be due an inconducive political environment, although this is improving.
CPD/Clinical Relevance: While accurate dental records are essential for successful human identification using odontology, antemortem photographs of the teeth and 3D scans may also be useful.
Article
Identification using dental records is an efficient, reliable and economical procedure. Odontology is a primary identifier, so can be used alone or in combination with other means of identification to establish the identity of an individual.1,2 Forensic odontology frequently relies upon dental restorations and site of the teeth present. However, historically forensic odontology seldom uses all of the information available about the teeth and jaws, including size and shape of teeth and arches, and the intra and inter-arch relationships of teeth and jaws. Identification using odontology is dependent on the presence of adequate dental remains, and on the availability and quality of antemortem (AM) dental records.3 Dental records should be accurate and the dental chart is one of the fundamental components of dental records; however, one audit of more than 1000 dental charts from general dental practice in the UK revealed that 44% were incorrect.4,5 Forensic odontologists will use all available elements of the dental records whenever possible, including clinical notes and radiographs, and if available photographs, laboratory slips, referral letters, models, orthodontic appliances, mouth guards, occlusal splints and bleaching trays.6,7 Radiographs, photographs and study models capture the dentition reliably at a given point in time, and when available in the dental records, they may prove to be invaluable for an odontologist. Even photographs of the smile that have not been taken by the dental team may be a reliable source of AM information with the potential to help solve certain cases of human identification.8 Forensic odontology case studies in the literature have described the comparison between a 2-dimensional (2D) AM photograph and a 2D post-mortem (PM) photograph.8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17 With the advent of 3-dimensional (3D) technology, further opportunities have arisen for different methodologies of forensic comparison to support a forensic odontology conclusion in human identification.18,19,20
Register now to continue reading
Thank you for visiting Dental Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits: