Greenfield S, Kaplan S, Ware JE Expanding patient involvement in care – effects on patient outcomes. Ann Intern Med. 1985; 102:520-528
Kaplan SH, Greenfield S, Ware JE Assessing the effects of physician-patient interactions on the outcomes of chronic disease. Med Care. 1989; 27:S110-S127
Savage R, Armstrong D Effect of a general practitioner's consulting style on patients' satisfaction: a controlled study. Br Med J. 1990; 301:968-970
Sondell K, Palmqvist S, Soderfeldt B The dentist's communicative role in prosthodontic treatment. Int J Prosthodont. 2004; 17:666-671
Hamasaki T, Soh I, Takehara T, Hagihara A Applicability of both dentist and patient perceptions of dentists' explanations to the evaluation of dentist-patient communication. Community Dent Health. 2011; 28:274-279
Parsons TLondon: Tavistock Publications; 1951
Szasz T, Hollender M A contribution to the philosophy of medicine: the basic models of the doctor-patient relationship. Arch Intern Med. 1956; 97:585-592
Donabedian A Evaluating the quality of medical care. The Milbank Quarterly. 2005; 83:691-729
Byrne P, Long BExeter: Royal College of General Practitioners; 1976
Pendleton D Doctor-patient communication: a review. In: Pendleton D, Hasler J (eds.). London: Academic Press Inc; 1983
Inui T, Carter W Problems and prospects for health services research on provider-patient communication. Med Care. 1985; 23:521-538
Frederikson L Development of an integrative model for medical consultation. Health Commun. 1993; 5:225-237
Frederikson L Exploring information-exchange in consultation: the patients' view of performance and outcomes. Patient Educ Couns. 1995; 25:237-246
Kurtz S Doctor-patient communication: principles and practices. Can J Neurolog Sci. 2002; 29:23-29
Longo D Understanding health information, communication, and information seeking of patients and consumers: a comprehensive and integrated model. Health Expect. 2005; 8:189-194
Ong L, De Haes J, Hoos A, Lammes F Doctor-patient communication: a review of the literature. Soc Sci Med. 1995; 40:903-918
Coleman H, Burton J Aspects of control in the dentist-patient relationship. Int J Sociol Lang. 1985; 51:75-104
Sondell K, Söderfeldt B Dentist-patient communication: a review of relevant models. Acta Odontol Scand. 1997; 55:116-126
Newsome P, Wright G A review of patient satisfaction: 2. Dental patient satisfaction: an appraisal of recent literature. Br Dent J. 1999; 186:166-170
A review of communication models and frameworks in a healthcare context Brenda SS Cheng Susan M Bridges Cynthia KY Yiu Colman P McGrath Dental Update 2024 42:2, 707-709.
This paper reviews six key communication models and frameworks in healthcare contexts. Comparison suggests key inter-relationships between the different stages of the clinical consultations. Implications are identified for future study in healthcare provider-patient communication.
Clinical Relevance: To understand the healthcare provider-patient interaction through communication models.
Article
If one accepts that personal communication is core to the healthcare provider-patient relationship, then the quality of these interactions during routine consultations will have an important impact on outcomes. Provider-patient communication dynamics, however, can be influenced by different issues, such as the content of the encounter and the style of both parties' interactions.1,2,3,4,5 These practical issues, however, cannot be fully explained without a conceptual understanding of existing healthcare communication models or frameworks. This article, therefore, briefly reviews key communication models and frameworks in healthcare developed since 1950, which underpin provider-patient relationships in medical and dental contexts. This examination of the historical development of the existing conceptual models and frameworks may potentially provide directions for future research in healthcare provider-patient communication.
The earliest studies related to healthcare provider-patient relationships date back to the 1950s. To analyse a society as a social system, Parsons6 proposed that people were assumed to enact roles associated with their positions. Interactions between two individuals, such as a physician and a patient, were analysed using his sociological theory of structural-functionalism. Drawing on this theory, the doctor was considered as the one who played the dominant position by virtue of his/her professional knowledge and skills.
Register now to continue reading
Thank you for visiting Dental Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits: