References

Ballal NV, Kandian S, Mala K, Bhat KS, Acharya S. Comparison of the efficacy of maleic acid and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid in smear layer removal from instrumented human root canal: a scanning electron microscopic study. J Endod. 2009; 35:1573-1576
Ballal NV, Kundabala M, Bhat S, Rao N, Rao BS. A comparative in vitro evaluation of cytotoxic effects of EDTA and maleic acid: root canal irrigants. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009; 108:633-638
Ballal NV, Sudheer M, Kundabala M, Kadengodlu SB, Syed SH, Shriram P. Evaluation of chemical interactions of maleic acid with sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine gluconate. J Endod. 2011; 37:1402-1405
Silva PV, Guedes DFC, Nakad FV, Pécora JD, Cruz-Filho AM. Chitosan: a new solution for removal of smear layer after root canal instrumentation. Int Endod J. 2013; 46:(4)332-338
Prado M, Gusman H, Gomes BPFA, Simao RA. Scanning electron microscopic investigation of the effectiveness of phosphoric acid in smear layer removal when compared with EDTA and citric acid. J Endod. 2011; 37:255-258
Spano JC, Silva RG, Guedes DF, Sousa-Neto MD, Estrela C, Pécora JD. Atomic absorption spectrometry and scanning electron microscopy evaluation of concentration of calcium ions and smear layer removal with root canal chelators. J Endod. 2009; 35:727-730
Estrela C, Holland R, Bernabé PFE, Souza V, Estrela CRA. Antimicrobial potential of medicaments used in healing process in dog's teeth with apical periodontitis. Braz Dent J. 2004; 15:181-185

Newer chelating agents

From Volume 40, Issue 7, September 2013 | Page 589

Authors

Vasudev Ballal

Manipal College of Dental Sciences Manipal, Karnataka, India

Articles by Vasudev Ballal

Article

I read with great interest the article by Melissa Good et al regarding endodontic solutions which was published in the May 2012 issue of your journal (Dent Update 2012; 39: 239–246). I wanted to share a few of my thoughts on the newer agents which have been used to remove the smear layer. (a) 7% Maleic acid has been shown to be significantly more effective than 17% EDTA in removing the smear layer from the apical third of the root canal system.1 It has also been found to be less cytotoxic when compared to 17% EDTA.2 Also, unlike EDTA, maleic acid does not form any precipitate when combined with 2% chlorhexidine gluconate.3 (b) 0.2% Chitosan has been shown to be effective in smear layer removal, especially in the middle and apical thirds of the root canal system.4 (c) 37% Phosphoric acid has been demonstrated to be superior to 17% EDTA and 10% citric acid in the apical third of the root canal system.5 (d) Apple vinegar, which consists of malic acid, has been shown to remove the smear layer as efficiently as17% EDTA.6 It has also been shown to be effective against endodontic pathogens.7

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Dental Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Up to 2 free articles per month
  • New content available