References

Van Noort R. The future of dental devices is digital. Dent Mater. 2012; 28:3-12
Wu G, Zhou B, Bi Y, Zhao Y. Selective laser sintering technology for customized fabrication of facial prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 2008; 100:56-60
Kaufui V, Wong KV, Hernandez A. A review of additive manufacturing. Mech Eng. 2012;
Zemnick C, Woodhouse SA, Gewanter RM, Raphael M, Piro JD. Rapid prototyping technique for creating a radiation shield. J Prosthet Dent. 2007; 97:236-241
Barker TM, Earwaker WJ, Lisle DA. Accuracy of stereolithographic models of human anatomy. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 1994; 38:106-111
Choi JY, Choi JH, Kim NK, Kim Y, Lee JK, Kim MK, Lee JH, Kim MJ. Analysis of errors in medical rapid prototyping models. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002; 31:23-32
Bill JS, Reuther JF, Dittmann W, Kübler N, Meier JL, Pistner H, Wittenberg G. Stereolithography in oral and maxillofacial operation planning. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1995; 24:98-103
Mankovich NJ, Samson D, Pratt W, Lew D, Beumer J. Surgical planning using three-dimensional imaging and computer modeling. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1994; 27:875-889
Sood AK, Ohdar RK, Mahapatra SS. Parametric appraisal of mechanical property of fused deposition modelling processed parts. Mater Des. 2010; 31:287-295
Cooper KG. Rapid Prototyping Technology: Selection and Application.USA: CRC Press (Taylor & Francis Group); 2001
Kruth JP. Material incress manufacturing by rapid prototyping techniques. CIRP Annals (Elsevier). 1991; 40:603-614
Halloran JW, Tomeckova V, Gentry S, Das S, Cilino P, Yuan D Photopolymerization of powder suspensions for shaping ceramics. J Eur Ceram Soc. 2011; 31:2613-2619
Pham DT, Ji C. A study of recoating in stereolithography. Proc Inst Mech Eng C J Mech Eng Sci. 2003; 217:105-117
Kim H, Choi JW, Wicker R. Scheduling and process planning for multiple material stereolithography. Rapid Prototyp J. 2010; 16:232-240
Isheil A, Gonnet JP, Joannic D, Fontaine JF. Systematic error correction of a 3D laser scanning measurement device. Opt Lasers Eng. 2011; 49:16-24
Szilvśi-Nagy M, Matyasi GY. Analysis of STL files. Math Comput Model. 2003; 38:945-960
Tang HH, Chiu ML, Yen HC. Slurry-based selective laser sintering of polymer-coated ceramic powders to fabricate high strength alumina parts. J Eur Ceram Soc. 2011; 31:1383-1388
Salmoria GV, Paggi RA, Lago A, Beal VE. Microstructural and mechanical characterization of PA12/MWCNTs nanocomposite manufactured by selective laser sintering. Polym Test. 2011; 30:611-615
Morvan S, Hochsmann R, Sakamoto M. ProMetal RCT (TM) process for fabrication of complex sand molds and sand cores. Rapid Prototyp. 2005; 11:1-7
Ibrahim D, Broilo TL, Heitz C, de Oliveira MG, de Oliveira HW, Nobre SM Dimensional error of selective laser sintering, three-dimensional printing and PolyJet™ models in the reproduction of mandibular anatomy. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2009; 37:167-173
Ozbolat IT, Yu Y. Bioprinting toward organ fabrication: challenges and future trends. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2013; 60:691-699
Banks J. Adding value in additive manufacturing: researchers in the United Kingdom and Europe look to 3D printing for customization. IEEE Pulse. 2013; 4:22-26
Mertz L. Dream it, design it, print it in 3-D: what can 3-D printing do for you?. IEEE Pulse. 2013; 4:15-21
Ursan ID, Chiu L, Pierce A. Three-dimensional drug printing: a structured review. J Am Pharm Assoc. 2013; 53:136-144
Schubert C, Van Langeveld MC, Donoso LA. Innovations in 3D printing: a 3D overview from optics to organs. Br J Ophthalmol. 2014; 98:159-161
Gross BC, Erkal JL, Lockwood SY, Chen C, Spence DM. Evaluation of 3D printing and its potential impact on biotechnology and the chemical sciences. ACS Publications Anal Chem. 2014; 86:3240-3253
Wong JY, Pfahnl AC. 3D printing of surgical instruments for long-duration space missions. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2014; 85:758-763
Cui X, Boland T, D'Lima DD, Lotz MK. Thermal inkjet printing in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Recent Pat Drug Deliv Formul. 2012; 6:149-155

A review of additive manufacturing in conservative dentistry and endodontics part 1: basic principles

From Volume 46, Issue 2, February 2019 | Pages 125-132

Authors

Peddi Shanmukh Srinivas

Postgraduate Student, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, JSS Dental College and Hospital, Jagadguru Shree Shivaratheeshwara University, Mysuru, India

Articles by Peddi Shanmukh Srinivas

TS Ashwini

Postgraduate Student, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Maratha Mandal's Nathajirao G Halgekar Institute of Dental Sciences, Belgaum, Karnataka, India

Articles by TS Ashwini

MG Paras

Faculty, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, JSS Dental College and Hospital, Jagadguru Shree Shivaratheeshwara University, Mysuru, India

Articles by MG Paras

Abstract

Abstract: The field of science and research is dynamic and the scientific discipline of restorative dentistry and endodontics is no exception. The practice of dentistry and the technology involved has evolved tremendously from the traditional to the contemporary. As a result of continual developments in technology, newer cutting edge methods in production and treatment have evolved. This paper explores the scope of additive manufacturing technology in restorative dentistry and endodontics, progress achieved in this field, practicality hurdles, and a promising future that this technology might provide if harnessed to its full potential.

CPD/Clinical Relevance: This paper gives an update on current concepts of additive manufacturing being employed in the field of restorative dentistry and endodontics for clinical practice, academic progress and translational research.

Article

An extensive electronic search was performed of articles on PubMed from 1990 to 2017. Key words such as ‘Additive printing’, ‘3D-bioprinting’, ‘CAD CAM’, ‘Rapid prototyping’ and ‘Restorative dentistry’ were used alone or in combination to search the database. The option of ‘related articles’ was also utilized. Finally, a search was performed of the references of review articles and the most relevant clinical research papers.

In recent times, the use of CAD/CAM in dentistry has been synonymous with the rapid production of dimensionally accurate prostheses thereby omitting tedious laboratory procedures. Most of the current methods using CAD/CAM fabrication techniques in dentistry have concentrated on milling from a solid block of material (ie subtractive manufacturing). However, this method of manufacturing comes with some inherent limitations such as:

Considering the limitations, in the near future one can expect a major transition from making prostheses by subtractive manufacturing to what is referred to as additive manufacturing. Additive manufacturing processes were traditionally used to make prototypes or models and thus it had its origin in rapid prototyping (RP).

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Dental Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Up to 2 free articles per month
  • New content available