Wong JY, Pfahnl AC. 3D printing of surgical instruments for long-duration space missions. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2014; 85:758-763
Rastogi VK, Smith LS, Schmid MJ, Parsons LM, Grant CG, Kondor S, Macedonia C. A novel approach for assured sterility of medical devices. J Med Device. 2013; 7:030947-51
Bletzinger KU, Ramm E. Structural optimization and form finding of light weight structures. Comput Struct. 2001; 79:2053-2062
Patent application publication: Pub No. US 2015/0366635 A1. 2015;
Byun C, Kim C, Cho S, Baek SH, Kim G, Kim SG, Kim SY. Endodontic treatment of an anomalous anterior tooth with the aid of a 3-dimensional printed physical tooth model. J Endod. 2015; 41:961-965
Miyazaki T, Hotta Y, Kunii J, Kuriyama S, Tamaki Y. A review of dental CAD/CAM: current status and future perspectives from 20 years of experience. Dent Mater J. 2009; 28:44-56
Colpani JT, Borba M, Della Bona Á. Evaluation of marginal and internal fit of ceramic crown copings. Dent Mater. 2013; 29:174-180
Anunmana C, Charoenchitt M, Asvanund C. Gap comparison between single crown and three-unit bridge zirconia substructures. J Adv Prosthodont. 2014; 6:253-258
Tamac E, Toksavul S, Toman M. Clinical marginal and internal adaptation of CAD/CAM milling, laser sintering, and cast metal ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 2014; 112:909-913
E Silva JS, Erdelt K, Edelhoff D, Araújo É, Stimmelmayr M, Vieira LC, Güth JF. Marginal and internal fit of four-unit zirconia fixed dental prostheses based on digital and conventional impression techniques. Clin Oral Investig. 2014; 18:515-523
Song TJ, Kwon TK, Yang JH, Han JS, Lee JB, Kim SH, Yeo IS. Marginal fit of anterior 3-unit fixed partial zirconia restorations using different CAD/CAM systems. J Adv Prosthodont. 2013; 5:219-225
Srikakula NK, Babu CS, Reddy JR, Saiprasad SH, Raju AS. Comparision of marginal fit of zirconium oxide copings generated using four different CAD-CAM systems – an in vitro study. J Res Adv Dent. 2014; 3:163-171
Sailer I, Fehér A, Filser F, Gauckler LJ, Luthy H, Hammerle CH. Five-year clinical results of zirconia frameworks for posterior fixed partial dentures. Int J Prosthodont. 2007; 20:383-387
Bornemann G, Lemelson S, Luthardt R. Innovative method for the analysis of the internal 3D fitting accuracy of Cerec-3 crowns. Int J Comput Dent. 2001; 5:177-182
Park JY, Kim HY, Kim JH, Kim JH, Kim WC. Comparison of prosthetic models produced by traditional and additive manufacturing methods. J Adv Prosthodont. 2015; 7:294-302
Mai HN, Lee KB, Lee DH. Fit of interim crowns fabricated using photopolymer-jetting 3D printing. J Prosthet Dent. 2017; 118:208-215
Yahata Y, Masuda Y, Komabayashi T. Comparison of apical centring ability between incisal-shifted access and traditional lingual access for maxillary anterior teeth. Aust Endod J. 2017; 43:123-128
Gok T, Capar ID, Akcay I, Keles A. Evaluation of different techniques for filling simulated C-shaped canals of 3-dimensional printed resin teeth. J Endod. 2017; 43:1559-1564
Patel S, Aldowaisan A, Dawood A. A novel method for soft tissue retraction during periapical surgery using 3D technology: a case report. Int Endod J. 2017; 50:813-822
Robberecht L, Chai F, Dehurtevent M, Marchandise P, Bécavin T, Hornez JC, Deveaux E. A novel anatomical ceramic root canal simulator for endodontic training. Eur J Dent Educ. 2017; 21:e1-e6
Zehnder MS, Connert T, Weiger R, Krastl G, Kühl S. Guided endodontics: accuracy of a novel method for guided access cavity preparation and root canal location. Int Endod J. 2016; 49:966-972
Shi X, Zhao S, Wang W, Jiang Q, Yang X. Novel navigation technique for the endodontic treatment of a molar with pulp canal calcification and apical pathology. Aust Endod J. 2018; 44:66-70
Obregon F, Vaquette C, Ivanovski S, Hutmacher DW, Bertassoni LE. Three-dimensional bioprinting for regenerative dentistry and craniofacial tissue engineering. J Dent Res. 2015; 94:143-152
Bertassoni LE, Cecconi M, Manoharan V, Nikkhah M, Hjortnaes J, Cristino AL Hydrogel bioprinted microchannel networks for vascularization of tissue engineering constructs. Lab Chip. 2014; 14:2202-2211
Miller JS, Stevens KR, Yang MT, Baker BM, Nguyen DH, Cohen DM Rapid casting of patterned vascular networks for perfusable engineered three-dimensional tissues. Nat Mater. 2012; 11:768-774
Hanson Shepherd JN, Parker ST, Shepherd RF, Gillette MU, Lewis JA, Nuzzo RG. 3D microperiodic hydrogel scaffolds for robust neuronal cultures. Adv Funct Mater. 2011; 21:47-54
Nakao K, Morita R, Saji Y, Ishida K, Tomita Y, Ogawa M The development of a bioengineered organ germ method. Nat Methods. 2007; 4:227-230
Ikeda E, Morita R, Nakao K, Ishida K, Nakamura T, Takano-Yamamoto T Fully functional bioengineered tooth replacement as an organ replacement therapy. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2009; 106:13475-13480
Kim K, Lee CH, Kim BK, Mao JJ. Anatomically shaped tooth and periodontal regeneration by cell homing. J Dent Res. 2010; 89:842-847
Zhang W, Ahluwalia IP, Yelick PC. Three dimensional dental epithelial-mesenchymal constructs of predetermined size and shape for tooth regeneration. Biomaterials. 2010; 31:799-8003
Lipson H. New world of 3-D printing offers “completely new ways of thinking”: Q&A with author, engineer, and 3-D printing expert Hod Lipson. IEEE Pulse. 2012; 4:12-14
Schubert C, Van Langeveld MC, Donoso LA. Innovations in 3D printing: a 3D overview from optics to organs. Br J Ophthalmol. 2014; 98:159-161
Cui X, Boland T, D'Lima DD, Lotz MK. Thermal inkjet printing in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Recent Pat Drug Deliv Formul. 2012; 6:149-155
Gross BC, Erkal JL, Lockwood SY, Chen C, Spence DM. Evaluation of 3D printing and its potential impact on biotechnology and the chemical sciences. Anal Chem. 2014; 86:3240-3253
Ozbolat IT, Yu Y. Bioprinting toward organ fabrication: challenges and future trends. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2013; 60:691-699
Chiu YC, Fang HY, Hsu TT, Lin CY, Shie MY. The characteristics of mineral trioxide aggregate/polycaprolactone 3-dimensional scaffold with osteogenesis properties for tissue regeneration. J Endod. 2017; 43:923-929
A review of additive manufacturing in conservative dentistry and endodontics part 2: applications in restorative dentistry and endodontics Peddi Shanmukh Srinivas TS Ashwini MG Paras Dental Update 2024 46:3, 707-709.
Authors
Peddi ShanmukhSrinivas
Postgraduate Student, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, JSS Dental College and Hospital, Jagadguru Shree Shivaratheeshwara University, Mysuru, India
Postgraduate Student, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Maratha Mandal's Nathajirao G Halgekar Institute of Dental Sciences, Belgaum, Karnataka, India
Faculty, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, JSS Dental College and Hospital, Jagadguru Shree Shivaratheeshwara University, Mysuru, India
The field of science and research is dynamic and the scientific disciplines of restorative dentistry and endodontics is no exception. The practice of dentistry and the technology involved has evolved hugely from the traditional to the contemporary. As a result of continual developments in technology, newer cutting edge methods in production and treatment have evolved. This paper explores the scope of additive manufacturing technology in restorative dentistry and endodontics, progress achieved in this field, practicality hurdles, and a promising future that this technology might provide if harnessed to its full potential.
CPD/Clinical Relevance: This paper gives an update on current concepts of additive manufacturing being employed in the field of restorative dentistry and endodontics for clinical practice, academic progress and translational research.
Article
A study conducted by Wong and Pfahnl evaluated the feasibility of fused deposition modelling (FDM) 3D printing 10 Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS) thermoplastic surgical instruments.1 All simulated preparation, draping, incising, and suturing tasks were successfully performed using 3D printed instruments. All 13 surgeons were in agreement that the 3D printed instruments performed adequately, and experienced operators would be able to adapt using the 3D printed thermoplastic surgical instruments. In future, it will be feasible to 3D print surgical tools pre-operatively on demand for dental procedures. This production method has an inherent advantage over sterilization as heating of the thermoplastic filament during the FDM printing process can sterilize the printed product.1 A study found that the high temperature (300–311°C) of the FDM 3D printing process sterilized 18 of 20 tested ABS thermoplastic instruments fabricated on a Stratasys Dimension u Print Plus SE printer.2
Register now to continue reading
Thank you for visiting Dental Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:
