References

Loe H, Schiott CR The effect of mouthrinse and topical applications of chlorhexidine on the developments of dental plaque and gingivitis in man. J Periodont Res. 1970; 5:79-83
Addy M, Moran JM Clinical indications for the use of chemical adjuncts to plaque control: chlorhexidine formulations. Periodontol 2000. 1997; 15:52-54
European Commission, CosIng (EC regulation v.2). (Accessed April 2015)
Liippo J, Kousa P, Lammintausta K The relevance of chlorhexidine contact allergy. Contact Derm. 2011; 64:229-234
Opstrup MS, Johansen JD, Bossi R, Lundov MD, Garvey LH Chlorhexidine in cosmetic products – a market survey. Contact Derm. 2014; 72:55-58
Nshioka K, Doi T, Katayama I Histamine release in contact urticaria. Contact Derm. 1984; 11
Ohtoshi T, Yamauchi N, Tadokoro K IgE antibody-mediated shock reaction caused by topical application of chlorhexidine. Clin Allergy. 1986; 16:155-161
Cheung J, O'Leary JJ Allergic reaction to chlorhexidine in an anaesthetised patient. Anaesth Intens Care. 1985; 13:429-430
Ramselaar CG, Craenen A, Bijleveld RT Severe allergic reaction to an intraurethral preparation containing chlorhexidine. Br J Urol. 1992; 70:451-452
Evans RJ Acute anaphylaxis due to topical chlorhexidine acetate. Br Med J. 1992; 304
Heinemann C, Sinaiko R, Maibach HI Immunological contact urticaria and anaphylaxis to chlorhexidine: overview. Exog Dermatol. 2002; 1:186-194
Chisholm DG, Calder I, Peterson D Intranasal chlorhexidine resulting in anaphylactic circulatory arrest. Br Med J. 1997; 315
Stephens R, Mythen M, Kallis P Two episodes of life-threatening anaphylaxis in the same patient to a chlorhexidine-sulphadiazine coated central venous catheter. Br J Anaesth. 2001; 87:306-308
Central venous catheters (Arrowguard®) recalled: anaphylactic shock.Geneva: World Health Organization; 1997
Centre for Devices and Radiological Health. Potential hypersensitivity reactions to chlorhexidine-impregnated medical devices. 1998. (Accessed August 1, 1998)
Odedra KM, Farooque S Chlorhexidine: an unrecognised cause of anaphylaxis. Postgrad Med J. 2014; 90:709-714
Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency. 2012. (Accessed April 2015)
Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency. 2012. (Accessed April 2015)
Search Results – (eMC). 2015. (Accessed April 2015)
Liippo J, Kousa P, Lammintausta K The relevance of chlorhexidine contact allergy. Contact Dermatitis. 2011; 64:(4)229-234
Thune P Two patients with chlorhexidine allergy - anaphylactic reactions and eczema. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1998; 118:(21)3295-3296
Okano M, Nomura M, Hata S Anaphylactic symptoms due to chlorhexidine gluconate. Arch Dermatol. 1989; 125:50-52
Sharma A, Chopra H Chlorhexidine urticaria: a rare occurrence with a common mouthwash. Indian J Dent Res. 2009; 20:377-379
Pemberton MN, Gibson J Chlorhexidine and hypersensitivity reactions in dentistry. Br Dent J. 2012; 213:547-550
2011. (Accessed January 2015)
BBC News. Mouthwash reaction killed Brighton dental patient. 2011. (Accessed January 2015)
Brighton woman dies at dentist. 2011. (Accessed January 2015)
Yengopal V, Mickenautsch S Chlorhexidine for the prevention of alveolar osteitis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012; 41:1253-1264
Daly B, Sharif MO, Newton T, Jones K, Worthington HV Local interventions for the management of alveolar osteitis (dry socket). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012; 12

Allergy to chlorhexidine

From Volume 43, Issue 3, April 2016 | Pages 272-274

Authors

Michael N Pemberton

BDS, MBChB, FDS RCS(Ed)

Consultant in Oral Medicine, University Dental Hospital of Manchester, Higher Cambridge Street, Manchester M15 6FH, UK

Articles by Michael N Pemberton

Abstract

Chlorhexidine is an effective antiseptic which is widely used in dentistry. Over recent years, it has also been used in other healthcare products as well as in cosmetics. Anaphylaxis to chlorhexidine has been increasingly reported throughout the world, including two incidents in the UK where chlorhexidine-containing mouthwash had been used to wash tooth sockets following recent tooth extraction. Chlorhexidine is under-recognized as a cause of anaphylaxis and dentists should be aware of its potential for serious adverse effects. Dentists need to consider whether the washing out of a tooth socket with chlorhexidine solution should be avoided in the treatment of established dry socket. On current evidence the potential risks of using chlorhexidine as irrigation solution for treating an established dry socket appears to outweigh any known benefit.

CPD/Clinical Relevance: Chlorhexidine has the potential to cause anaphylaxis in the dental surgery.

Article

Over the last 50 years, chlorhexidine has become widely used in dentistry, in healthcare in general, and in cosmetics, and it is likely that its use will continue to grow. With this increase in use there are increasing possibilities for adverse effects of which the dental practitioner should be aware.

Chlorhexidine is a widely used antiseptic with which all dental practitioners are familiar. It has been extensively used in dentistry, most frequently for the control of dental plaque and reduction of gingivitis since the 1970s, following studies showing 0.1–0.2% chlorhexidine mouthwash to be of benefit.1,2 Chlorhexidine has also become available for oral use in toothpaste, sprays, gels and periodontal chips.

Chlorhexidine is also widely used as an antiseptic on the skin. In the early 1990s, chlorhexidine began to be incorporated into the composition of medical devices including catheters, skin dressings and surgical mesh.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Dental Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Up to 2 free articles per month
  • New content available