Pulte D, Brenner H. Changes in survival in head and neck cancers in the late 20th and early 21st century: a period analysis. Oncologist. 2010; 15:994-1001
Chaturvedi AK, Anderson WF, Lortet-Tieulent J Worldwide trends in incidence rates for oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers. J Clin Oncol. 2013; 31:(36)
Gandini S, Botteri E, Iodice S Tobacco smoking and cancer: a meta-analysis. Int J Cancer. 2008; 122:155-164
Bagnardi V, Rota M, Botteri E Alcohol consumption and site-specific cancer risk: a comprehensive dose-response meta-analysis. Br J Cancer. 2015; 112:580-593
Maasland DH, van den Brandt PA, Kremer B, Goldbohm RA, Schouten LJ. Alcohol consumption, cigarette smoking and the risk of subtypes of head-neck cancer: results from the Netherlands Cohort Study. BMC Cancer. 2014; 14
Fortin A, Wang CS, Vigneault É. Influence of smoking and alcohol drinking behaviors on treatment outcomes of patients with squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009; 74:1062-1069
Marron M, Boffetta P, Zhang ZF Cessation of alcohol drinking, tobacco smoking and the reversal of head and neck cancer risk. Int J Epidemiol. 2009; 39:182-196
Schache AG, Powell NG, Cuschieri KS HPV-related oropharyngeal cancer in the United Kingdom: an evolution in understanding of disease etiology. Cancer Res. 2016; 76:(22)6598-6606
Shaw R, Beasley N. Aetiology and risk factors for head and neck cancer: United Kingdom National Multidisciplinary Guidelines. J Laryngol Otol. 2016; 130:(S2)S9-S12
Sargeran K, Murtomaa H, Safavi SM, Vehkalahti MM, Teronen O. Survival after diagnosis of cancer of the oral cavity. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008; 46:187-191
Sciubba JJ. Oral cancer. The importance of early diagnosis and treatment. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2001; 2:239-251
Scully C, Newman L, Bagan JV. The role of the dental team in preventing and diagnosing cancer: 2. Oral cancer risk factors. Dent Update. 2005; 32:261-274
Mashberg A, Samit A. Early diagnosis of asymptomatic oral and oropharyngeal squamous cancers. CA Cancer J Clin. 1995; 45:328-351
Guideline for the Referral of Patients with Suspected Head and Neck Cancer.: Pan Birmingham NHS Cancer Network; 2011
Roland N, Porter G, Fish B, Makura Z. Tumour assessment and staging: United Kingdom National Multidisciplinary Guidelines. J Laryngol Otol. 2016; 130:(S2)S53-S58
Nutting C. Radiotherapy in the head and neck: United Kingdom Multidisciplinary Guidelines. J Laryngol Otol. 2016; 130:(S2)S66-S67
Huang SH, Xu W, Waldron J Refining American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union for International Cancer Control TNM stage and prognostic groups for human papillomavirus-related oropharyngeal carcinomas. J Clin Oncol. 2015; 33:836-845
Head and Neck cancer part 1: diagnosis and classification Oliver Jones Stephanie Hackett Despoina Chatzistavrianou David Newsum Dental Update 2024 46:8, 707-709.
Specialist in Prosthodontics, Specialty Registrar in Restorative Dentistry, Birmingham Dental Hospital and University of Birmingham School of Dentistry, Birmingham Community Healthcare NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK
Consultant in Restorative Dentistry, BDS, MFD RCS, MSc, MRCPS, MRD RCSEd, FDS(Rest Dent) RCSEd, Birmingham Dental Hospital and School of Dentistry, Birmingham Community Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
Head and neck cancer is a group of cancers that affects the oropharynx, nasopharynx, laryngopharynx and neck. With improving survival rates for patients, general dental practitioners (GDPs) are becoming increasingly likely to engage in the care of affected patients. Therefore, a sound clinical knowledge of the aetiology, treatment and rehabilitation for head and neck cancer is essential for all practitioners who may be involved in the care pathways for such patients.
CPD/Clinical Relevance: This paper provides an update on the prevalence, risk factors, diagnosis and classification of head and neck cancer.
Article
Head and neck cancer, and the treatment for it, can be one of the most socially disabling conditions and can leave patients with life-changing functional and aesthetic deficits. It is an umbrella term for all cancers in the region, including those of the oropharynx, nasopharynx, laryngopharynx and neck.1
Although oral cancer incidence has risen in recent years (a rise of 30% since the early 1990s),2 treatment modalities have become more successful and survival has improved.3 Therefore, GDPs are becoming increasingly likely to engage in the care pathway of affected patients.
Prevalence
In 2014, there were 11,449 new cases of head and neck cancer in the UK, a prevalence increase of 30% since the 1990s (Figure 1);2
Head and neck cancer is the eighth most common cancer type in the UK and accounts for 3% of all new cancer diagnoses;2
Historically, male cases of head and neck cancer outweighed females. However, females are becoming more frequently affected, with a 40% increase in recent years compared to a 20% increase in males;2
The peak age range for head and neck cancer diagnosis is between 65–69 in both males and females, with over 95% of all cases being in individuals over the age of 40.2 However, there is an increasing incidence in the younger population and this is thought to be related to HPV transmission;2,4
Head and neck cancer is most commonly diagnosed at a late stage when there has already been spread to the lymph nodes (62% at stage III or IV compared to 38% at stage I or II).2 This has profound implications in the treatment and prognosis for the patient;
In both males and females the most prevalent site of head and neck cancer is the larynx, followed by the tonsils (Figure 2);
Oral cancer incidence rates are projected to rise by 33% in the UK between 2014 and 2035, to 20 cases per 100,000 people. This is compared to 8 cases per 100,000 in 1979.2 With this increasing incidence of head and neck cancer, management in general practice will become more common.
Risk factors
Knowledge of the common risk factors for head and neck cancer can enable dental practitioners to consider the individualized risk levels of their patients and enable them to offer specific and tailored advice. An overview of risk factors for head and neck cancer is outlined in Table 1.
Immunosuppressive therapy, eg following transplant
Diet
Oral submucous fibrosis Actinic keratosis
The major risk factors for head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC) are tobacco smoking5 and heavy alcohol consumption.6 When looked at synergistically, there is a multiplicative interaction between these risk factors7 which can adversely affect the treatment outcomes for this cohort of patients.8 Cessation of tobacco use and alcohol consumption can significantly decrease the risk of developing head and neck cancers. After 20 years of smoking or alcohol cessation, the risk of developing head and neck cancer reaches that of non-smokers or drinkers.9
The role of human papilloma virus-16 (HPV-16) is increasingly recognized as a risk factor in oropharyngeal cancer,4 with between 9–61% (mean 51%) being HPV-16 positive.10 The role of other HPV subtypes in HNSCC are not yet fully understood, nor are the opportunities for reducing this risk, however, it has been suggested that vaccination against HPV could help to prevent HPV-positive oropharyngeal cancers.11
Premalignant lesions or systemic conditions, such as leukoplakia, erythroplakia and acquired immunodeficiencies, also pose a risk for the development of head and neck cancers. Example clinical presentations of the common oral lesions are given in Table 2.
Urgent
Prompt
Non-Urgent
Squamous cell carcinoma
Chronic hyperplastic candidosis
Infected fibro-epithelial polyp
Verrucous hyperplasia
Leukoplakia
Fibro-epithelial polyp
Traumatic ulcer related to denture overextensions
Traumatic ulcer
Finally, a diet which is low in fruit and vegetables is thought to increase the risk of developing head and neck cancer.12
Diagnosis
Early diagnosis of head and neck cancer is recognized to affect survival rates for patients dramatically (Table 3).14,15 Dental professionals are in a unique position to recognize lesions of the head and neck and, to this effect, there is a great degree of importance to full extra-oral and intra-oral examination.16
Classification of Head and Neck Cancer
Net 5-year Survival Rate
Hypopharyngeal
28%
Sinus
51%
Oral cavity
56%
Tongue
60%
Laryngeal (male only)
65%
Oropharyngeal
67%
Salivary gland
67%
Examination should include palpation of the lymph nodes of the neck and thorough examination of the intra-oral soft tissues. Suspicious lymph nodes will feel hard, fixed (at a late stage) and non-painful, in contrast to inflamed lymph nodes that will be tender to palpation and move more freely. High risk sites of mouth cancer include the floor of the mouth, lateral border of the tongue and the retromolar regions but, increasingly, lesions are also being diagnosed on the soft and hard palate, gingiva and buccal mucosa.17
Dentists should be aware of the large variation in presenting signs and symptoms of head and neck cancer. Typically, cancerous oral lesions present as:
Persistent ulcers which may be exophytic and indurated;
Red/white/mixed patches of the mucosa;
There is often, but not always, fixation of the surrounding tissue of the lesion, and associated symptoms, such as sensory or motor deficit, unexplained tooth mobility and lymph node enlargement;
Patients may complain of disruption of function, difficulty in swallowing or an altered sensation, such as paraesthesia or dysaesthesia;
Other presenting features may be a long-standing sore throat or non-healing socket post-extraction.
Guidance for the referral of suspicious oral lesions has been produced by NICE in the document Suspected Cancer, Recognition and Referral, 2015.18 This guidance can assist with decision-making for urgent ‘2 week wait’ referrals and to distinguish lesions which require prompt and non-urgent review by secondary care units (Table 4).18
Urgent (Within 2 weeks)
Prompt
Non-Urgent
Unexplained ulcer persisting for >3 weeks
Lichen planus
Polyps
Unexplained red or white patch which is painful, swollen or bleeding
White patches without redness or ulceration
Fibrous epulis
Persistent swelling of oral mucosa for >3 weeks
Unilateral salivary gland swellings
Recurrent oral ulceration
Unexplained lump in the neck or recently changing lump
Chronic hyperplastic candidosis
Mucoceles
Unexplained tooth mobility not associated with periodontal disease
Oral sub-mucous fibrosis
Pyogenic granuloma
Unexplained persistent and sore throat
Amalgam tattoos
Hoarseness persisting for more than 3 weeks
Traumatic ulcers
Referrals for those lesions which warrant urgent review should be sent to the local Oral and Maxillofacial service via the correct referral process for that department (note that some centres are now moving to electronic Referral Management Systems (RMS)). Information on the referral process can be found online or by contacting the departmental secretaries. Correspondence should be clearly marked as ‘urgent’ for rapid processing and it is the duty of the receiving Trust to see that patient within 2 weeks of receipt. It is also useful to contact the department to ensure that a referral has been received. Should there be doubt of the validity for urgent referral, clinicians should contact their local Oral and Maxillofacial service for advice. See Figure 3 for an example of a local referral form for suspected head and neck cancer.19
Clinical photography may be useful in these cases to document the lesion, but primary care providers are encouraged not to biopsy or disturb suspicious lesions.
Classification – staging and grading
Following a confirmed positive biopsy of a cancerous head or neck lesion, a diagnostic work-up involving further examination and investigations will be instigated by the head and neck multidisciplinary team (MDT), whose full role and responsibilities will be discussed in the next article.
The grade and stage of the lesion will be identified alongside assessment of patient comorbidities to develop the most suitable treatment pathway:20
Grading is a way of classifying cancer cells based on the histological appearance and looks at how the cells are differentiated, the rate of division and how likely they are to spread;
The stage classification is based on the extent of cancer and whether it has metastasized. The staging can then be used in the planning of treatment and to give an indication of prognosis. This classification is more commonly communicated between patients and professionals alike.
The TNM (T = tumour size, N = nodal involvement, M = metastatic spread) classification20 is most commonly used to stage head and neck cancers. Figure 4 provides an overview of the TNM staging classification for head and neck cancers.
From December 2017 an updated version (version 8) of the TNM classification system was implemented by the International Union Against Cancer (UICC).21 This considers a new classification for HPV p16 positive oropharyngeal tumours, separate classification of nodal involvement for all head and neck sites and, amongst others, a new classification for SCCs of the skin of the head and neck. Currently, the guidance is considered complex and UK units are advised to continue to use version 7 of the TNM staging system.22
Staging is important for identification of the prognosis of tumours and to aid the treatment decision-making process. The prognosis for head and neck cancer drops by 50% when there is spread to lymph nodes (N1), and decreases further with increasing stages, highlighting that early diagnosis is paramount.15 T0–T2 lesions are usually successfully treated with a single treatment modality (surgery or radiotherapy), whereas higher stages will require adjunctive or palliative treatment. T4a and T4b indicate the surgical operability of the tumour, where T4b stage is considered inoperable.23
Tumours with a high risk of recurrence are associated with the following features:
Invasive and non-cohesive patterns;
Perineural and perivascular spread;
Invasion into adjacent structures;
Close surgical margins;
Extracapsular spread of lymph nodes.
The treatment modalities for stages of head and neck cancer, and their side-effects, will be discussed in more detail in the next article of this series. Outlined in Table 3 are the 5-year net survival rates for adults with different head and neck cancer diagnoses.2 In addition, HPV positive patients will experience improved survival outcomes in comparison to HPV negative patients.24 The treatment modalities for stages of head and neck cancer and their side-effects will be discussed in more detail in the next article of the series.
Conclusions
With head and neck cancer becoming more prevalent in the UK, dentists are ever more likely to encounter patients at various stages along their journey. Dental practitioners have a role to play in the diagnosis of malignant lesions of the head and neck and should understand what requires urgent, prompt or non-urgent referral and the process these should follow. Dentists should also have an understanding of the basis of the TNM classification, and the implications that this has on treatment and prognosis for the patient. The second and third articles in this series will discuss the journey the patient takes from diagnosis through treatment and then onto rehabilitation.