References

Clark RKF, Radford DR, Juszczyk AS. Current trends in removable partial denture teaching in British dental schools. Br Dent J. 2011; 211:531-535
Puryer J, Woods K, Terry J, Sandy J, Ireland AJ. The confidence of undergraduate dental students when carrying out prosthodontic treatment and their perception of the quality of prosthodontic education. Eur J Dent Educ. 2018; 22:e142-e148
Turner JW, Moazzez R, Banerjee A. First impressions count. Dent Update. 2012; 39:455-471
Jacobson TE, Krol AJ. A contemporary review of the factors involved in complete denture retention, stability, and support. Part I: Retention. J Prosthet Dent. 1983; 49:5-15
Guides to Standards in Prosthetic Dentistry – Complete and Partial Dentures. Guidelines in Prosthetic and Implant Dentistry. 1996; 7-11
Pietrokovski J, Kaffe I, Arensburg B. Retromolar ridge in edentulous patients: clinical considerations. J Prosthod. 2007; 16:502-506
Ismail YH, Bowman JF. Position of the occlusal plane in natural and artificial teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1968; 20:407-411
Jayachandran S, Ramachandran CR, Varghese R. Occlusal plane orientation: a statistical and clinical analysis in different clinical situations. J Prosthod. 2008; 17:572-575
Shetty S, Zargar NM, Shenoy K, Rekha V. Occlusal plane location in edentulous patients: a review. J Ind Prosthod Soc. 2013; 13:142-148
Neill D, Glaysher J. Identifying the denture space. J Oral Rehabil. 1982; 9:259-277
The Glossary of Prosthodontic Terms. J Prosthet Dent. 2017; 117:1-105
Jacobs RM, Brodie AG. Tonic and contractile components of the oral vestibular forces in young subjects with normal occlusion. Am J Orthod. 1966; 52:561-575
Gahan M, Walmsley A. The neutral zone impression revisited. Br Dent J. 2005; 198:269-272
Lynch CD, Allen PF. Overcoming the unstable mandibular complete denture: the neutral zone impression technique. Dent Update. 2006; 33:21-26
McCord JF, Grant AA. Prosthetics: Registration: Stage II – intermaxillary relations. Br Dent J. 2000; 188

Complete denture series part 2: tips on how to correct 10 avoidable errors

From Volume 46, Issue 6, June 2019 | Pages 537-545

Authors

Sivakumar Jayachandran

MDS, BDS, AFHEA

Specialty Dentist and PhD Student, Prosthetic Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Birmingham, 5 Mill Pool Way, Edgbaston, Birmingham B5 7EG, UK

Articles by Sivakumar Jayachandran

Wouter Leyssen

BDS, MJDF, MSc

Specialty Dentist in Restorative Dentistry, Birmingham Community NHS Healthcare Foundation Trust

Articles by Wouter Leyssen

A Damien Walmsley

PhD, MSc, BDS, FDS RCPS,

Professor of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, The University of Birmingham, St Chad's Queensway, Birmingham, B4 6NN, UK

Articles by A Damien Walmsley

Email A Damien Walmsley

Abstract

The first article of this series identified the common reasons for referral for complete denture patients to secondary care. With this background, this article provides general dental practitioners (GDPs) with clinical tips to avoid the common errors whilst making complete dentures.

CPD/Clinical Relevance: The use of the clinical tips may help GDPs to improve their clinical success in treating complete denture patients and, in turn, aim to avoid improper referrals to secondary care.

Article

Complete denture prosthodontics remains a difficult clinical procedure in general dental practice. This has been illustrated by the number of referrals received at Birmingham Dental Hospital for the provision of complete dentures, which are deemed ‘too complex to treat’. Changes in the dental curriculum to accommodate recent advancements in other fields of dentistry have reduced the time available for teaching complete denture prosthodontics.1 This has resulted in low confidence levels in treating patients who, in turn, are becoming frustrated with care in general dental practice.1, 2

In our previous article, the reasons for the referral of edentulous patients to Birmingham Dental Hospital were analysed. The referral letters from GDPs indicated that they were faced with a range of difficulties. The clinical records of the referred patients were reviewed and data collected. The main reasons for referring a patient to secondary care were issues with resorption of the mandibular ridge and looseness (Table 1). The group of ill-defined reasons (28%) are listed in Table 2.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Dental Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Up to 2 free articles per month
  • New content available