Douglass CW, Sheets CG Patients' expectations for oral health care in the 21st century. J Am Dent Assoc. 2000; 131:3S-7S
Kelly M, Steele J, Nuttall N, Bradnock G, Morris J, Nunn J, Pine C, Pitts N, Treasure E, White DLondon: Office for National Statistics; 1998
Nyman S, Lindhe J, Lundgren D The role of occlusion for the stability of fixed bridges in patients with reduced periodontal tissue support. J Clin Perio. 1975; 2:(2)53-66
Pjetursson BE, Sailer I, Zwahlen M, Hämmerle CH A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of all-ceramic and metal-ceramic reconstructions after an observation period of at least 3 years. Part I. Single crowns. Clin Oral Implant Res. 2007; 18:73-85
Sailer I, Pjetursson BE, Zwahlen M, Hämmerle CH A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of all-ceramic and metal-ceramic reconstructions after an observation period of at least 3 years. Part II. Fixed dental prostheses. Clin Oral Implant Res. 2007; 18:86-96
Kohorst P, Herzog TJ, Borchers L, Stiesch-Scholz M. Load bearing capacity of all-ceramic posterior four-unit fixed partial dentures with different zirconia frameworks. Eur J Oral Sci. 2007; 115:(2)161-166
Della Bona A, Kelly JR The clinical success of all-ceramic restorations. J Am Dent Assoc. 2008; 139:8S-13S
Miyazaki T, Hotta Y, Kunii J, Kuriyama S, Tamaki Y A review of dental CAD/CAM: current status and future perspectives from 20 years of experience. Dent Mat. 2009; 28:(1)44-56
Denry I, Kelly JR State of the art of Zirconia for dental applications. Dent Mat. 2008; 24:(3)299-307
Wang H, Aboushelib MN, Feilzer AJ Strength influencing variables on CAD/CAM zirconia frameworks. Dent Mat. 2008; 24:(5)633-638
Saunders WP, Saunders EM Prevalence of periradicular periodontitis associated with crowned teeth in an adult Scottish subpopulation. Br Dent J. 1998; 185:(3)137-140
A CAD/CAM designed, semi-fixed, high strength, all-ceramic prosthesis for maxillary rehabilitation – a case report Shashwat Bhakta Karl Deakin Rajendra Joshi Dental Update 2024 41:1, 707-709.
The clinical and laboratory steps involved in rehabilitating the maxillary arch following the loss of several teeth due to periodontal disease are outlined in this case report. This article illustrates the use of a laboratory based CAD/CAM system (Sirona In-Lab) and a copy milling technique in the fabrication of a fixed-movable bridge, high strength, all-ceramic, cross-arch bridge.
Clinical Relevance: Adopting a semi-fixed approach in cross-arch rehabilitation has conventionally involved the use of porcelain fused to metal (PFM) components but the demands placed by patients and clinicians have led to the development of novel techniques in order to achieve highly aesthetic and functional results.
Article
Patients' attitudes towards and expectations from dentistry have risen dramatically over the past few decades.1 This has highlighted the importance of attention to detail during the planning and execution of a course of dental treatment. This has increased the pressure on the clinician and technician and the interface between them.
Periodontal disease is a leading cause of tooth loss and the prosthetic management has conventionally been in the form of removable partial dentures.2 However, both clinicians and patients are showing an increasing tendency to approach this issue with fixed bridgework. Since Nyman et al published their seminal work in the 1970s,3 the prosthetic management of periodontitis has included bridgework acting as a fixed splint for periodontally involved teeth. A fixed-movable approach in fixed bridgework is sometimes necessary to allow for non-parallel paths of insertion, abutments with questionable prognoses and to incorporate attachments for the retention of removable prostheses.
Register now to continue reading
Thank you for visiting Dental Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits: