References

Eccles JD. Tooth surface loss from abrasion, attrition and erosion. Dent Update. 1982; 9:373-381
Gow AM, Kelleher MG. Tooth surface loss: unusual interproximal and lingual cervical lesions as a result of bizarre dental flossing. Dent Update. 2003; 30:331-336
Mumghamba EGS, Honkala S, Honkala E, Manji KP. Gingival recession, oral hygiene and associated factors among Tanzanian women. E Afr Med J. 2010; 86:125-132
Wu CD, Darout IA, Skaug N. Chewing sticks: timeless natural toothbrushes for oral cleansing. J Periodont Res. 2001; 36:275-284
Darwish S. The management of the Muslim dental patient. Br Dent J. 2005; 199:503-504
Axelsson P, Lindhe J. Effect of controlled oral hygiene procedures on caries and periodontal disease in adults. J Clin Periodont. 1978; 5:133-151
Al-Khateeb TL Periodontal treatment needs among Saudi Arabian adults and their relationship to the use of the Miswak. Comm Dent Hlth. 1991; 8:323-328
Hattab FN. Miswak: the natural toothbrush. J Clin Dent. 1997; 8:125-129
Ndungu FL, Kaimenyi JT, Arneberg P, Muthami LN. A comparative study of the efficacy of plaque control by a chewing stick and a tooth brush. E Afr Med J. 1990; 67:907-911
Farooqi MIH, Srivastava JG. The toothbrush tree (Salvadora persica). Quart J Crude Drug Res. 1968; 8:1297-1299
Bader A, Flamini G, Cioni PL, Morelli I. The composition of the root oil of Salvadora persica L. J Essent Oil Res. 2002; 14:(2)128-129
Francis G, Kerem Z, Makkar HPS The biological action of saponins in animal systems: a review. Br J Nutr. 2002; 88:(6)587-605
Tannins and human health: a review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 1998; 38:421-464
Sofrata A, Claesson L, Lingstrom P A strong antibacterial effect of Miswak against oral microorganisms associated with periodontitis and caries. J Periodont. 2008; 79:(8)1474-1479
Almas K. The antimicrobial effects of seven different types of Asian chewing sticks. Odontostomatol Trop. 2001; 24:(96)17-20
Almas K, Al-Zeid Z. The immediate antimicrobial effect of a toothbrush and miswak on cariogenic bacteria: a clinical study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2004; 5:(1)
Al Bayati K, Sulaiman K. In vitro antimicrobial activity of Salvadora persica L. extracts against some isolated pathogens in Iraq. Turk J Biol. 2008; 32:57-62
Darout IA, Skaug N, Albandar JM. Subgingival microbiota levels and their associations with periodontal status at the sampled sites in an adult Sudanese population using miswak or toothbrush regularly. Acta Odont Scand. 2003; 61:115-122
Norton M, Addy M. Chewing sticks versus toothbrushes in West Africa. A pilot study. Clin Prev Dent. 1989; 11:(3)
Eid MA, Selim HA. A retrospective study on the relationship between miswak chewing stick and periodontal health. Egypt Dent J. 1994; 40
Samad Younes SA, Angbawi MF. Gingival recession in the mandibular central incisor region of Saudi schoolchildren aged 10–15 years. Comm Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1983; 11:246-249
Eid MA, Selim HA, Al-Shammery AR. The relationship between chewing sticks (Miswak) and periodontal health. 3. Relationship to gingival recession.Berlin, Germany1985
Lee W, Eakle W. Possible role of tensile stress in the etiology of cervical erosive lesions of teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1984; 52:374-380
Bartlett D, Shah P. A critical review of non-carious cervical (wear) lesions and the role of abfraction, erosion and abrasion. J Dent Res. 2006; 85:306-312
Kitchin P. The prevalence of tooth root exposure and the relation of the extent of such exposure to the degree of abrasion in different age classes. J Dent Res. 1941; 20:565-581
Ibiyemi O, Oluwatosin Oketade I, Taiwo J, Oke G. Oral habits and tooth wear lesions among rural adult males in Nigeria. Arch Orofac Sci. 2010; 5:(2)31-35
Burke FJT. Resin-retained bridges: fibre-reinforced versus metal. Dent Update. 2008; 35:512-526
Butterworth C, Ellakwa E, Shortall A. Fibre-reinforced composites in restorative dentistry. Dent Update. 2003; 30:300-306
Malquarti G, Berruet RG, Bois D. Prosthetic use of carbon fibre-reinforced epoxy resin for aesthetic crowns and fixed partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 1990; 63:251-257
Smith DC. Recent developments and prospects on dental polymer. J Prosthet Dent. 1962; 12
Vallittu PK. Comparison of the in vitro fatigue resistance of an acylic resin removable partial denture reinforced with continuous glass fibres or metal wires. J Prosthodont. 1996; 5:115-121
Culy G, Tyas M. Direct resin-bonded, fibre-reinforced anterior bridges: a clinical report. Aust Dent J. 1998; 43:1-4
Kelleher MG, Bomfim DI, Austin RS. Biologically based restorative management of tooth wear. Int J Dent. 2012; https://doi.org/101155/2012742509

Bizarre tooth surface loss and the miswak stick

From Volume 41, Issue 4, May 2014 | Pages 355-364

Authors

Roshni Karia

BDS(Lon), MJDF RCS(Eng)

Senior House Officer, King's College London Dental Institute, London SE5 9RW, UK

Articles by Roshni Karia

Martin G Kelleher

Consultant and Specialist in Restorative Dentistry and Prosthodontics, King's College London Dental Institute, London SE5 9RW, UK

Articles by Martin G Kelleher

Abstract

Tooth surface loss can present in a variety of ways, some of which can appear rather strange on first examination. This case report demonstrates an unusual presentation of tooth surface loss (TSL) and its subsequent treatment. This loss of hard dental tissue appeared to be affecting the whole of the patient's remaining dentition, both lingually and buccally. Detailed questioning revealed the origins of this problem which turned out to be due to excessive use of an intra-oral Miswak chewing stick.

Clinical Relevance: This article will enable clinicians to understand the importance of specific, targeted history-taking, involving a rare case of tooth surface loss as well as the use of minimally destructive restoration composites and a fibre-reinforced composite bridge.

Article

Tooth surface loss, affecting both the lingual and buccal aspects of teeth presenting as a generalized pattern, is a relatively rarely reported pathological finding. More commonly, tooth surface loss occurs mainly on the palatal aspects of teeth (eg in cases of bulimia or gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (commonly abbreviated to GORD), or on the incisal or occlusal surfaces of teeth, or a combination of both depending on the various aetiologic factors.

There are a number of different descriptions and indices of tooth surface loss, some implying a supposedly definite aetiology. In 1982, Eccles described ‘tooth surface loss’ as a pathological loss of hard tooth tissue by a disease process other than dental caries.1

The aetiological factors responsible for tooth surface loss are usually described as belonging in one of the following main categories:

Tooth surface loss can be a progressive phenomenon, but it can also present as a reflection of past habits and/or of only slowly progressive tooth surface loss.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Dental Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Up to 2 free articles per month
  • New content available