Davies SJ, Gray RMJ, Whitehead SA. Good occlusal practice in advanced restorative dentistry. Br Dent J. 2001; 191:421-434
MacInnes A, Hall AF. Indications for cuspal coverage. Dent Update. 2016; 43:150-158
Ritter AV, Baratieri LN. Ceramic restorations for posterior teeth: guidelines for the clinician. J Esthet Dent. 1999; 11:72-86
Wirsching E, Loomans BA, Klaiber B, Dörfer CE. Influence of matrix systems on proximal contact tightness of 2- and 3-surface posterior composite restorations in vivo. J Dent. 2011; 39:386-390
Summit JB., Robins JW, Hilton HJ, Schwartz RS. Fundamentals of Operative Dentistry: A Contemporary Approach, 3rd edn. Chicago, US: Quintessence Publishing Co Ltd; 2006
This is the third, and final, part of this three-part series. The first paper discussed the occlusal and cracked tooth aetiological factors which may be responsible for restoration failure. The second paper discussed the restorative options with regards to cracked and root-treated teeth. This paper will provide an overview of the previous two papers and conclude with a case report.
CPD/Clinical Relevance: Failure of amalgam restorations is a commonly encountered clinical problem in general practice and no one case is the same. Therefore, a competent diagnosis and implementation of the most appropriate, minimally invasive treatment option requires an adequate knowledge of current literature.
Article
In the author's experience, clinicians usually find the area of cracked teeth confusing. Therefore, to help with this, a summary of the previous information discussed in the previous two papers has been provided in Figure 1. This flow chart aims to provide a logical, sequential approach when confronted with a cracked tooth. It is worth noting that the occlusal assessment takes place during the initial stages along with the normal clinical examination and pulp testing methods. It is important to consider occlusal trauma, endodontic pathology, chronic orofacial pain (eg atypical facial pain) and other dental pathologies (eg periodontal disease), as with the alternative aetiologies, without immediately assuming that there is a fracture within the tooth structure.
Under specific circumstances, it may not be possible to diagnose each and every patient case at the first appointment. If the situation arises where there are doubts regarding the diagnoses, then the astute clinician will collect all the relevant clinical information at the initial visit and treat as he/she feels is most appropriate at the time of presentation, whilst being as conservative as possible. The following review appointment may confirm the provisional suspicion, or it will provide a new insight into the underlying cause. However, if there are any uncertainties with regards to the diagnosis, then the clinician should seek a second opinion from a suitably qualified colleague.
Register now to continue reading
Thank you for visiting Dental Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits: