References

Baum L, Phillips RW, Lund MR., 2nd edn. Philadelphia; London: WB Saunders; 1985
Bonsor SJ, Pearson GJ., 1st edn. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier; 2013
Mouawad S, Artine S, Hajjar P, McConnell R, Fahd JC, Sabbagh J. Frequently asked questions in direct pulp capping of permanent teeth. Dent Update. 2014; 41:298-304
Barnes IE, Kidd EA. Disappearing Dycal. Br Dent J. 1979; 147
Garberoglio R, Brännström M. Scanning electron microscopic investigation of human dentinal tubules. Arch Oral Biol. 1976; 21:355-362
, 8th edn. In: Cohen S, Burns RC (eds). St Louis, Missouri, USA: Mosby; 2002
Cox CF, Subay RK, Suzuki S, Suzuki SH, Ostro E. Biocompatibility of various dental materials: pulp healing with a surface seal. Int J Periodont Rest Dent. 1996; 16:240-251
Brännström M, Astrom A. The hydrodynamics of the dentine; its possible relationship to dentinal pain. Int Dent J. 1972; 22:219-227
Geurtsen W, Spahl W, Leyhausen G. Residual monomer/additive release and variability in cytotoxicity of light-curing glass-ionomer cements and compomers. J Dent Res. 1998; 77:2012-2019
Leyhausen G, Abtahi M, Karbakhsch M, Sapotnick A, Geurtsen W. Biocompatibility of various light-curing and one conventional glass-ionomer cement. Biomaterials. 1998; 19:559-564
Bonsor SJ. Bonded amalgams and their use in clinical practice. Dent Update. 2011; 38:222-230
Campbell S. Technique tips: immediate dentine sealing and adhesive cementation of a ceramic crown. Dent Update. 2013; 40
Stavridakis M, Krejci I, Magne P. Immediate dentin sealing of onlay preparations: thickness of pre-cured dentin bonding agent and effect of surface cleaning. Oper Dent. 2005; 30:747-757
Magne P, Kim TH, Cascione D, Donovan TE. Immediate dentin sealing improves bond strength of indirect restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 2005; 94:511-519
Magne P, So WS, Cascione D. Immediate dentin sealing supports delayed restoration placement. J Prosthet Dent. 2007; 98:166-174
Bonsor SJ. Contemporary use of flowable resin composite materials. Dent Update. 2008; 35:600-606
Cara RR, Fleming GJ, Palin WM, Walmsley AD, Burke FJ. Cuspal deflection and microleakage in premolar teeth restored with resin-based composites with and without an intermediary flowable layer. J Dent. 2007; 35:482-489
Davidson CL, Feilzer AJ. Polymerization shrinkage and polymerization shrinkage stress in polymer-based restoratives. J Dent. 1997; 25:435-440
Lutz F, Krejci I, Barbakow F. Quality and durability of marginal adaptation in bonded composite restorations. Dent Mater. 1991; 7:107-113
Filtek Bulk Fill Posterior Restorative Technical Product Profile.
Gaintantzopoulou MD, Gopinath VK, Zinelis S. Evaluation of cavity wall adaptation of bulk esthetic materials to restore class II cavities in primary molars. Clin Oral Investig. 2017; 21:1063-1070
Baek SH, Lee WC, Setzer FC, Kim S. Periapical bone regeneration after endodontic microsurgery with three different root-end filling materials: amalgam, SuperEBA, and mineral trioxide aggregate. J Endod. 2010; 36:1323-1325
Koubi G, Colon P, Franquin JC, Hartmann A, Richard G, Faure MO, Lambert G. Clinical evaluation of the performance and safety of a new dentine substitute, Biodentine, in the restoration of posterior teeth – a prospective study. Clin Oral Investig. 2013; 17:243-249
Mente J, Leo M, Panagidis D, Ohle M, Schneider S, Lorenzo Bermejo J Treatment outcome of mineral trioxide aggregate in open apex teeth. J Endod. 2013; 39:20-26
Han L, Okiji T. Bioactivity evaluation of three calcium silicate-based endodontic materials. Int Endod J. 2013; 46:808-814
Camilleri J, Kralj P, Veber M, Sinagra E. Characterization and analyses of acid-extractable and leached trace elements in dental cements. Int Endod J. 2012; 45:737-743
Grech L, Mallia B, Camilleri J. Characterization of set Intermediate Restorative Material, Biodentine, Bioaggregate and a prototype calcium silicate cement for use as root-end filling materials. Int Endod J. 2013; 46:632-641
Vosoughhosseini S, Lotfi M, Shahi S, Baloo H, Mesgariabbasi M, Saghiri MA Influence of white versus gray mineral trioxide aggregate on inflammatory cells. J Endod. 2008; 34:715-717
Shahi S, Rahimi S, Yavari HR, Mokhtari H, Roshangar L, Abasi MM Effect of mineral trioxide aggregates and Portland cements on inflammatory cells. J Endod. 2010; 36:899-903
Laurent P, Camps J, De Meo M, Dejou J, About I. Induction of specific cell responses to a Ca(3)SiO(5)-based posterior restorative material. Dent Mater. 2008; 24:1486-1494
Mori GG, Teixeira LM, de Oliveira DL, Jacomini LM, da Silva SR. Biocompatibility evaluation of biodentine in subcutaneous tissue of rats. J Endod. 2014; 40:1485-1488
da Fonseca TS, da Silva GF, Tanomaru-Filho M, Sasso-Cerri E, Guerreiro-Tanomaru JM, Cerri PS. In vivo evaluation of the inflammatory response and IL-6 immunoexpression promoted by Biodentine and MTA Angelus. Int Endod J. 2016; 49:145-153
Watson TF, Atmeh AR, Sajini S, Cook RJ, Festy F. Present and future of glass-ionomers and calcium-silicate cements as bioactive materials in dentistry: biophotonics-based interfacial analyses in health and disease. Dent Mater. 2014; 30:50-61
Camilleri J, Kralj P, Veber M, Sinagra E. Characterization and analyses of acid-extractable and leached trace elements in dental cements. Int Endod J. 2012; 45:737-743
Laurent P, Camps J, About I. BiodentineTM induces TGF-beta1 release from human pulp cells and early dental pulp mineralization. Int Endod J. 2012; 45:439-448
Mente J, Geletneky B, Ohle M, Koch MJ, Friedrich Ding PG, Wolff D Mineral trioxide aggregate or calcium hydroxide direct pulp capping: an analysis of the clinical treatment outcome. J Endod. 2010; 36:806-813
Hilton TJ, Ferracane JL, Mancl L Northwest Practice-based Research Collaborative in Evidence-based Dentistry (NWP). Comparison of CaOH with MTA for direct pulp capping: a PBRN randomized clinical trial. J Dent Res. 2013; 92:16S-22S
Zhu C, Ju B, Ni R. Clinical outcome of direct pulp capping with MTA or calcium hydroxide: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015; 8:17055-17060
Li Z, Cao L, Fan M, Xu Q. Direct pulp capping with calcium hydroxide or mineral trioxide aggregate: a meta-analysis. J Endod. 2015; 41:1412-1417
Bachoo IK, Seymour D, Brunton P. Clinical case reports using a novel calcium-based cement. Br Dent J. 2013; 214:61-64
Barthel CR, Rosenkranz B, Leuenberg A, Roulet JF. Pulp capping of carious exposures: treatment outcome after 5 and 10 years: a retrospective study. J Endod. 2000; 26:525-528

Contemporary strategies and materials to protect the dental pulp

From Volume 44, Issue 8, September 2017 | Pages 731-741

Authors

Stephen J Bonsor

BDS(Hons) MSc FHEA FDS RCPS(Glasg) FDFTEd FCGDent GDP

The Dental Practice, 21 Rubislaw Terrace, Aberdeen; Hon Senior Clinical Lecturer, Institute of Dentistry, University of Aberdeen; Online Tutor/Clinical Lecturer, University of Edinburgh, UK.

Articles by Stephen J Bonsor

Abstract

Abstract: After cavity preparation, the aim of the restorative dentist is to protect the dental pulp. In the past this was done using cements, but without any understanding of the role of micro-organisms. In contemporary practice, lining materials and dentine-bonding agents are placed with the intention of sealing the dentinal tubules, so preventing microleakage. In cases where potential exposure of the pulp has occurred, bioactive and biocompatible materials may be selected with the intention of facilitating pulpal healing. This paper reviews the historical thinking and compares this with the materials used commonly these days as a result of this greater understanding.

CPD/Clinical Relevance: The clinician should aim to preserve the health of the dental pulp by using a material to create an environment to facilitate healing and provide protection against the ingress of oral micro-organisms.

Article

When returning damaged teeth to form and function, the aim of restorative dentistry must also be to preserve the heath and integrity of the dental pulp. The disease process and subsequent operative intervention will cause an inflammatory response within the pulpal tissues. It is important that the restorative dentist considers the measures that he or she can take to protect this inflamed tissue and create an environment which is conducive to healing. Traditionally, linings and bases were placed on the pulpal surfaces of cavities in an attempt to achieve this aim. However, knowledge and understanding have advanced and, with the development and availability of new dental materials, new strategies are employed in contemporary practice. This paper reviews the approach employed for many years after cavity preparation and explores how this new thinking, combined with newer dental materials, has shaped the current management of pulpal protection.

For many years, once cavity preparation had been completed, an intermediate material1 was placed on those surfaces overlaying the pulp prior to the placement of the definitive facilitating material. The selection of this restorative material was influenced by the proximity of the pulp following caries removal.1 These materials were crudely classified into liners or bases. Baum et al's Textbook of Operative Dentistry,1 whose ninth edition was published in 1985, defined liners as ‘materials that are placed as thin coatings, and their main function is to provide a barrier against chemical irritation. They do not function as thermal insulators. They are not used to produce a structural form for the preparation. Examples of liner materials are varnish-type materials to which calcium hydroxide or zinc oxide powder is added.’1 Bases, on the other hand, ‘function as barriers against chemical irritation, provide thermal insulation and resist forces applied during condensation of the restorative material. They are capable of being shaped and contoured to specific preparation forms. Examples of these materials are zinc oxide-eugenol, zinc phosphate, zinc polycarboxylate (polyalkenoate/polyacrylate), and glass ionomer cements and some of the commercial preparations containing calcium hydroxide.’1 Furthermore, bases were effectively a dentine replacement material used to decrease the bulk of restorative material.2 Depending on the depth of the cavity, these materials were used singly or in combination with another.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Dental Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Up to 2 free articles per month
  • New content available