Elani HW, Starr JR, Da Silva JD, Gallucci GO. Trends in dental implant Use in the US, 1999–2016, and projections to 2026. J Dent Res. 2018; 97:1424-1430 https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034518792567
Buser D, Janner SF, Wittneben JG 10-year survival and success rates of 511 titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: a retrospective study in 303 partially edentulous patients. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012; 14:839-851 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2012.00456.x
Degidi M, Nardi D, Piattelli A. 10-year follow-up of immediately loaded implants with TiUnite porous anodized surface. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012; 14:828-838 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2012.00446.x
Fischer K, Stenberg T. Prospective 10-year cohort study based on a randomized controlled trial (RCT) on implant-supported full-arch maxillary prostheses. Part 1: sandblasted and acid-etched implants and mucosal tissue. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012; 14:808-815 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00389.x
Pavel K, Seydlova M, Dostalova T Dental implants and improvement of oral health-related quality of life. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2012; 40:65-70 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.2011.00668.x
Patel N, Vijayanarayanan RP, Pachter D, Coulthard P. Oral health related quality of life: pre and post dental implant treatment. Oral Surg. 2015; 8:18-22 https://doi.org/10.1111/ors.12106
Melas F, Marcenes W, Wright PS. Oral health impact on daily performance in patients with implant-stabilized overdentures and patients with conventional complete dentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2001; 16:700-712
Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1986; 1:11-25
Chin JS, Lynch CD, Rees J Teaching of implant dentistry in undergraduate dental schools in the UK and Ireland. Br Dent J. 2018; 225:763-768 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2018.867
Jayachandran S, Bhandal BS, Hill KB, Walmsley AD. Maintaining dental implants – do general dental practitioners have the necessary knowledge?. Br Dent J. 2015; 219:25-28 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2015.528
Vere JW, Eliyas S, Wragg PF. Attitudes of general dental practitioners to the maintenance of Locator retained implant overdentures. Br Dent J. 2014; 216 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2014.50
Albrektsson T, Brånemark PI, Hansson HA, Lindström J. Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man. Acta Orthop Scand. 1981; 52:155-170 https://doi.org/10.3109/17453678108991776
Jung RE, Al-Nawas B, Araujo M Group 1 ITI consensus report: The influence of implant length and design and medications on clinical and patient-reported outcomes. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018; 29:69-77 https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13342
Barfeie A, Wilson J, Rees J. Implant surface characteristics and their effect on osseointegration. Br Dent J. 2015; 218 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2015.171
Morton D, Gallucci G, Lin WS Group 2 ITI Consensus Report: Prosthodontics and implant dentistry. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018; 29:215-223 https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13298
Zembic A, Bösch A, Jung RE Five-year results of a randomized controlled clinical trial comparing zirconia and titanium abutments supporting single-implant crowns in canine and posterior regions. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013; 24:384-390 https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12044
Haro Adánez M, Nishihara H, Att W. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the clinical outcome of zirconia implant-restoration complex. J Prosthodont Res. 2018; 62:397-406 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2018.04.007
Vouros ID, Kalpidis CD, Horvath A Systematic assessment of clinical outcomes in bone-level and tissue-level endosseous dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012; 27:1359-1374
Gracis S, Michalakis K, Vigolo P Internal vs. external connections for abutments/reconstructions: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012; 23:202-216 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02556.x
Esposito M, Ardebili Y, Worthington HV. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different types of dental implants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014; (7) https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003815.pub4
Canullo L, Fedele GR, Iannello G, Jepsen S. Platform switching and marginal bone-level alterations: the results of a randomized-controlled trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010; 21:115-121 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01867.x
Wilson TG The positive relationship between excess cement and peri-implant disease: a prospective clinical endoscopic study. J Periodontol. 2009; 80:1388-1392 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2009.090115
Wittneben JG, Millen C, Brägger U. Clinical performance of screw-versus cement-retained fixed implant-supported reconstructions – a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014; 29:84-98 https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.2014suppl.g2.1
Thomason JM, Feine J, Exley C Mandibular two implant-supported overdentures as the first choice standard of care for edentulous patients – the York Consensus Statement. Br Dent J. 2009; 207:185-186 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2009.728
Heitz-Mayfield LJ, Needleman I, Salvi GE, Pjetursson BE. Consensus statements and clinical recommendations for prevention and management of biologic and technical implant complications. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014; 29 Suppl:346-350 https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.2013.g5
Daly A, McCracken G. Peri-implant disease part 1: diagnosis and assessment. Dent Update. 2019; 46:978-985
Armitage GC, Xenoudi P. Post-treatment supportive care for the natural dentition and dental implants. Periodontol 2000. 2016; 71:164-84 https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12122
Berglundh T, Armitage G, Araujo MG Peri-implant diseases and conditions: Consensus report of workgroup 4 of the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions. J Periodontol. 2018; 89:S313-S318 https://doi.org/10.1002/JPER.17-0739
Renvert S, Persson GR, Pirih FQ, Camargo PM. Peri-implant health, peri-implant mucositis, and peri-implantitis: case definitions and diagnostic considerations. J Clin Periodontol. 2018; 45:S278-S285 https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12956
Dental Implants for the general dental practitioner. Part 1: overview and assessment Oliver Jones Philippa Hoyle Rajesh Patel Dental Update 2024 48:11, 707-709.
Consultant in Restorative Dentistry, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Charles Clifford Dental Hospital, 76 Wellesley Road, Sheffield S10 2SZ, UK (philippahoyle1@hotmail.co.uk)
Dental implants have become an increasingly prevalent treatment option for the replacement of missing teeth. Multiple studies have reported survival rates for implant supported restorations above 90% after 10 years. However, dental implants are not without complications and with their increasing placement, it is more likely that primary care dentists and dental care professionals will encounter patients presenting with problems. The first article in this two-part series provides an overview of implant components and relevant anatomy, as well as outlining a systematic method of undertaking a clinical and radiographical examination of dental implants.
CPD/Clinical Relevance: This series highlights important aspects of dental implants and their associated restorations that dental care professionals should consider when examining and maintaining such restorations, as well as providing an overview of associated biological and mechanical complications.
Article
Dental implants have become an increasingly prevalent treatment option for the replacement of missing teeth.1 They can be used to retain and support both fixed and removable dental prostheses, with some studies showing implant fixture survival rates above 90% after 10 years.2,3,4,5 The positive impact that such prostheses have on a patient's oral health-related quality of life has also been demonstrated over shorter follow-up periods.6,7,8 It should be noted that success and survival are not analogous terms when considering dental implants, and they can be applied to either the implant fixture or the attached prosthesis. Survival with regards to the implant fixture means that it is simply present in the mouth, with possible bone loss, and success means the implant is functional without mobility, bone loss or symptoms.9 With increasing implant placement and good success and survival rates, it is likely that patients with dental implants will be encountered within primary care.
Register now to continue reading
Thank you for visiting Dental Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:
