Goodacre CJ, Bernal G, Rungcharassaeng K, Kan JY. Clinical complications with implants and implant prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 2003; 90:121-132 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(03)00212-9
Jepsen S, Berglundh T, Genco R Primary prevention of peri-implantitis: managing peri-implant mucositis. J Clin Periodontol. 2015; 42:S152-157 https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12369
Renvert S, Persson GR, Pirih FQ, Camargo PM. Peri-implant health, peri-implant mucositis, and peri-implantitis: case definitions and diagnostic considerations. J Periodontol. 2018; 89:S304-S312 https://doi.org/10.1002/JPER.17-0588
Derks J, Tomasi C. Peri-implant health and disease. A systematic review of current epidemiology. J Clin Periodont. 2015; 42:S158-171
Renvert S, Polyzois I. Risk indicators for peri-implant mucositis: a systematic literature review. J Clin Periodontol. 2015; 42:S172-186 https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12346
Salvi GE, Aglietta M, Eick S Reversibility of experimental peri-implant mucositis compared with experimental gingivitis in humans. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012; 23:182-190 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02220.x
Salvi GE, Ramseier CA. Efficacy of patient-administered mechanical and/or chemical plaque control protocols in the management of peri-implant mucositis. A systematic review. J Clin Periodontol. 2015; 42:S187-201 https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12321
Schwarz F, Schmucker A, Becker J. Efficacy of alternative or adjunctive measures to conventional treatment of peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Implant Dent. 2015; 1 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-015-0023-1
Heitz-Mayfield LJ, Needleman I, Salvi GE, Pjetursson BE. Consensus statements and clinical recommendations for prevention and management of biologic and technical implant complications. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014; 29 Suppl:346-350 https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.2013.g5
Figuero E, Graziani F, Sanz I, Herrera D, Sanz M. Management of peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis. Periodontol 2000. 2014; 66:255-273 https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12049
Costa FO, Takenaka-Martinez S, Cota LO Peri-implant disease in subjects with and without preventive maintenance: a 5-year follow-up. J Clin Periodontol. 2012; 39:173-181 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2011.01819.x
Schwarz F, Herten M, Sager M Comparison of naturally occurring and ligature-induced peri-implantitis bone defects in humans and dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007; 18:161-170 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01320.x
Ferreira SD, Silva GL, Cortelli JR Prevalence and risk variables for peri-implant disease in Brazilian subjects. J Clin Periodontol. 2006; 33:929-935 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2006.01001.x
Souza AB, Tormena M, Matarazzo F, Araújo MG. The influence of peri-implant keratinized mucosa on brushing discomfort and peri-implant tissue health. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016; 27:650-655 https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12703
Serino G, Ström C. Peri-implantitis in partially edentulous patients: association with inadequate plaque control. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009; 20:169-174 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01627.x
Karoussis IK, Salvi GE, Heitz-Mayfield LJ Long-term implant prognosis in patients with and without a history of chronic periodontitis: a 10-year prospective cohort study of the ITI Dental Implant System. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003; 14:329-339 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.000.00934.x
Roccuzzo M, Bonino F, Aglietta M, Dalmasso P. Ten-year results of a three arms prospective cohort study on implants in periodontally compromised patients. Part 2: clinical results. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012; 23:389-395
Strietzel FP, Reichart PA, Kale A, Kulkarni M, Wegner B, Küchler I. Smoking interferes with the prognosis of dental implant treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Periodont. 2007; 34:523-544
Chrcanovic BR, Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Smoking and dental implants: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2015; 43:487-498 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2015.03.003
Safioti LM, Kotsakis GA, Pozhitkov AE Increased levels of dissolved titanium are associated with peri-implantitis–a cross-sectional study. J Periodont. 2017; 88:436-442
Heitz-Mayfield LJ, Aaboe M, Araujo M Group 4 ITI Consensus Report: risks and biologic complications associated with implant dentistry. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018; 29:351-358 https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13307
Lang NP, Wilson TG, Corbet EF. Biological complications with dental implants: their prevention, diagnosis and treatment. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2000; 11:146-155 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011s1146.x
De Bartolo AM, Veitz-Keenan A. Inconclusive evidence of treatment modalities for peri-implantitis. Evid Based Dent. 2019; 20:24-25 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41432-019-0007-8
Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Worthington HV. Treatment of peri-implantitis: what interventions are effective? A Cochrane systematic review. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2012; 5:S21-41
Subramani K, Wismeijer D. Decontamination of titanium implant surface and re-osseointegration to treat peri-implantitis: a literature review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012; 27:1043-1054
Garaicoa-Pazmino C, Sinjab K, Wang HL. Current protocols for the treatment of peri-implantitis. Curr Oral Health Rep. 2019; 6:209-217
Armitage GC, Xenoudi P. Post-treatment supportive care for the natural dentition and dental implants. Periodontology 2000. 2016; 71:(1)164-84
Louropoulou A, Slot DE, Van der Weijden F. The effects of mechanical instruments on contaminated titanium dental implant surfaces: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014; 25:1149-1160 https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12224
Romeo E, Ghisolfi M, Murgolo N Therapy of peri-implantitis with resective surgery. A 3-year clinical trial on rough screw-shaped oral implants. Part I: clinical outcome. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005; 16:9-18 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01084.x
Roccuzzo M, Layton DM, Roccuzzo A, Heitz-Mayfield LJ. Clinical outcomes of peri-implantitis treatment and supportive care: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018; 29:331-350 https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13287
Vere J, Bhakta S, Patel R. Prosthodontic complications associated with implant retained crowns and bridgework: a review of the literature. Br Dent J. 2012; 212:267-72 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2012.225
Davies SJ. Occlusal considerations in implantology: good occlusal practice in implantology. Dent Update. 2010; 37:610-620
Pjetursson BE, Asgeirsson AG, Zwahlen M, Sailer I. Improvements in implant dentistry over the last decade: comparison of survival and complication rates in older and newer publications. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014; 29 Suppl:308-324 https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.2014suppl.g5.2
Morton D, Gallucci G, Lin WS Group 2 ITI Consensus Report: prosthodontics and implant dentistry. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018; 29:215-223 https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13298
Jones O, Hoyle P, Patel R. Dental implants for the general dental practitioner. Part 1: overview and assessment. Dent Update. 2021; 48:915-924
Wittneben JG, Millen C, Brägger U. Clinical performance of screw-versus cement-retained fixed implant-supported reconstructions – a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014; 29:84-98 https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.2014suppl.g2.1
Andreiotelli M, Att W, Strub JR. Prosthodontic complications with implant overdentures: a systematic literature review. Int J Prosthodont. 2010; 23:195-203
Belser UC, Grütter L, Vailati F Outcome evaluation of early placed maxillary anterior single-tooth implants using objective esthetic criteria: a cross-sectional, retrospective study in 45 patients with a 2-to 4-year follow-up using pink and white esthetic scores. J Periodontol. 2009; 80:140-151 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2009.080435
Feine J, Abou-Ayash S, Al Mardini M Group 3 ITI Consensus Report: patient-reported outcome measures associated with implant dentistry. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018; 29:270-275
Jung RE, Zembic A, Pjetursson BE Systematic review of the survival rate and the incidence of biological, technical, and aesthetic complications of single crowns on implants reported in longitudinal studies with a mean follow-up of 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012; 23:2-21 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02547.x
Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Worthington HV. Agreement of quantitative subjective evaluation of esthetic changes in implant dentistry by patients and practitioners. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009; 24:309-315
Machuca C, Vettore MV, Robinson PG. How peoples' ratings of dental implant treatment change over time?. Qual Life Res. 2020; 29:1323-1334 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02408-1
Grusovin MG, Coulthard P, Worthington HV Interventions for replacing missing teeth: maintaining and recovering soft tissue health around dental implants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010; 2010 https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003069.pub4
Luz M, Klingbeil MF, Henriques PS, Lewgoy HR. Comparison between interdental brush and dental floss controlling interproximal biofilm in teeth and implants. Dent Health Curr Res. 2016; 2:1-4
Magnuson B, Harsono M, Stark PC Comparison of the effect of two interdental cleaning devices around implants on the reduction of bleeding: a 30-day randomized clinical trial. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2013; 34 Spec No 8:2-7
Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1986; 1:11-25
Dental Implants for the General Dental Practitioner. Part 2: Complications, Management and Maintenance Oliver Jones Philippa Hoyle Rajesh Patel Dental Update 2024 49:1, 707-709.
Consultant in Restorative Dentistry, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Charles Clifford Dental Hospital, 76 Wellesley Road, Sheffield S10 2SZ, UK (philippahoyle1@hotmail.co.uk)
With dental implants becoming a more common treatment option for the replacement of missing teeth, and with survival rates upwards of 90% after 10 years, it is likely that primary care dentists and dental care professionals will encounter patients presenting with problems. The second article in this two-article series outlines common biological and mechanical complications arising with dental implants and their component parts, and how to manage them.
CPD/Clinical Relevance: This article highlights important aspects the primary care practitioner should consider when examining and maintaining dental implants, and provides an overview of common biological and mechanical complications associated with implant-retained restorations.
Article
A complication in terms of implant dentistry may be considered as a non-ideal event or outcome. They can be broadly defined into three categories:1
Biological complications are multifactorial in origin, but primarily arise from plaque biofilm accumulation around the components of implants causing inflammation, bone loss and possibly leading to implant loss. Plaque biofilm accumulation is a result of suboptimal patient-performed oral hygiene, and it can be exacerbated by a poorly designed prosthesis preventing adequate plaque removal.2 Biological complications can also encompass soft-tissue complications, such as fistulae and peri-implant tissue overgrowth (Figure 1).
Peri-implant health is defined as an absence of visual inflammation, swelling and suppuration, a lack of bleeding on probing, probing-pocket depths (PPD) of <5 mm and the absence of bone loss beyond initial crestal remodelling occurring within the first year in function (which should be no greater than 2 mm) (Figure 2).3
Register now to continue reading
Thank you for visiting Dental Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits: