References

Louis Henri Sullivan. The Tall Office Building Artistically Considered. 1896;
American Dental Association Procedure Recap Report 2006.
Dietschi D. Free-hand composite resin restorations: a key to anterior aesthetics. Pract Periodont Aesthet Dent. 1995; 7:15-25
Scolovino S, Paolone G, Orsini G, Devoto W, Putignano A. The simultaneous modelling technique: closing gaps in posteriors. Int J Esthet Dent. 2016; 11:58-81
Glossary of Prosthodontic Terms. J Prosthet Dent. 117:1-105
Posselt U. Studies in the mobility of the human mandible. Acta Odontol Scand. 1952; 10:1-150
Douglass GD, DeVreugd RT. The dynamics of occlusal relationships. In: McNeill C (ed). Chicago: Quintessence; 1997
The Glossary of Occlusal Terms (s. l.). 1979;
DeVreugd RT. The occlusal compass concept: a practical approach to posterior tooth morphology. Quint Dent Tech. 1997; 20:75-83
Schuyler CH. Freedom in centric. Dent Clin North Am. 1969; 13:681-686
Polz MH. Inlay-und Onlay Techniken. Dental-Labor, Dokumentation 2.Munich: Verlag Neuer Merkur; 1987
Smithson J. The simplified concept. Predictable posterior composites. Dent Today. 2012; 31:136-140
Kanca J, Suh BI. Pulse activation: reducing resin-based composite contraction stresses at the enamel cavosurface margins. Am J Dent. 1999; 12:107-112
Qvist V, Johannessen L, Bruun M. Progression of approximal caries in relation to iatrogenic preparation damage. J Dent Res. 1992; 71:1370-1373
Alleman DS, Magne P. A systematic approach to deep caries removal end points: the peripheral seal concept in adhesive dentistry. Quintessence Int. 2012; 43:197-208
Fusayama T, Terachima S. Differentiation of 2 layers of carious dentin by staining. J Dent Res. 1972; 51
Yazici AR, Kiremitci A, Celik C, Ozgunaltay G, Dayangac B. A two-year clinical evaluation of pit and fissure sealants placed with and without air-abrasion pretreatment in teenagers. J Am Dent Assoc. 2006; 137:1401-1405
Barkmeier WW, Kelsey WP, Blankenau RJ, Peterson DS. Enamel cavosurface bevels finished with ultraspeed instruments. J Prosthet Dent. 1963; 49
Bichacho N. The centripetal build-up for composite resin posterior restorations. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent. 1994; 6:17-23
Smithson JR. Technique tips: the modified super-closed sandwich technique. Dent Update. 2013; 40:155-156

Form ever follows function: the occlusal compass and direct resin composite restorations

From Volume 46, Issue 4, April 2019 | Pages 344-350

Authors

Jason Smithson

Private Practice, Pure Dental Health and Wellbeing, Truro, Fellow, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Warwick Medical School, UK. Member: Bio_Emulation Think Tank

Articles by Jason Smithson

Abstract

Direct composite resins in the posterior dentition are a day-to-day treatment modality for most dental practitioners. It is challenging for many operators to produce a restoration that is both aesthetic and functional in a clinically realistic timeframe. This article helps to address this.

CPD/Clinical Relevance: To present a functionally-generated approach to occlusal anatomy based on the DeVreugd Occlusal Compass to simplify the placement of direct composite resin in the Class I and II situation.

Article

It is the pervading law of all things organic and inorganic, of all things physical and metaphysical, of all things human and all things super-human, of all true manifestations of the head, of the heart, of the soul, that life is recognizable in its expression That form ever follows function. That is the law1

The posterior direct resin restoration is the most common restoration carried out in general dental practice2 and therefore consumes a large amount of a dentist's energy and time. A significant portion of the appointment time for direct resin restorations in the posterior dentition is spent on layering and contouring resin masses and final finishing with rotary instrumentation.

The majority of operators choose to layer their composite resin in its pre-polymerized state as a fairly amorphous mass with basic cuspal inclines, followed by contouring and polishing with burs, discs and points after polymerization. In recent years, more anatomical layering techniques have been proposed3,4 which offer a more elegant solution to layering, however, they are based on layering the enamel masses to a preconceived aesthetic ideal. This means that the operator has an idea in his or her mind of the ideal occlusal anatomy (usually from textbooks of anatomy or, in Today's World, online learning) and then imparts this ‘one size fits all’ solution to each tooth. Whilst these approaches are simple to teach and easy to learn, they confer the following disadvantages:

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Dental Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Up to 2 free articles per month
  • New content available