Nixon PJ. Conservative aesthetic techniques for discoloured teeth: 2. Micro-abrasion and composite. Dent Update. 2007; 34:160-166
Robinson S, Nixon PJ, Gahan MJ, Chan MFW-Y. Techniques for restoring worn anterior teeth with direct composite resin. Dent Update. 2008; 35:551-558
Hemmings KW, Darbar UR, Vaughan S. Toothwear treated with direct composite restorations at an increased vertical dimension: results at 30 months. J Prosthet Dent. 2000; 83:287-293
Poyser NJ, Porter RW, Briggs PF The Dahl concept: past, present and future. Br Dent J. 2005; 198:669-676
Burke FJT, Cheung SW, Mjör IA, Wilson NHF. Restoration longevity and analysis of reasons for the placement and replacement of restorations provided by VDPs and their trainers in the UK. Quintessence Int. 1999; 30:234-242
Burke FJT, Wilson NHF, Cheung SW, Mjör IA. Influence of the method of funding on the age of failed restorations in general dental practice in the UK. Br Dent J. 2002; 192:699-702
Macedo G, Raj V, Ritter A. Longevity of anterior composite restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2006; 18:310-311
Brodbelt RH, O'Brien WJ, Fan PL. Translucency of dental porcelains. J Dent Res. 1980; 59:70-75
Franco EB, Francischone CE, Medina-Valdivia JR, Baseggio W. Reproducing the natural aspects of dental tissues with resin composites in proximoincisal restorations. Quintessence Int. 2007; 38:505-510
Perdiago J, Geraldeli S. Bonding characteristics of self-etching adhesives to intact versus prepared enamel. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2003; 15:32-41
Schneider PM, Messer LB, Douglas WH. The effect of enamel surface reduction in vitro on the enamel bonding of composite resin to permanent human enamel. J Dent Res. 1981; 60:895-900
Burke FJT, Combe EC, Douglas WH. Dentine bonding systems: 1. Mode of action. Dent Update. 2000; 27:85-93
Ferrari M, Tay FR. Technique sensitivity in bonding to vital, acid-etched dentin. Oper Dent. 2003; 28:3-8
Carpena LG, Colle ZA. Microleakage of occlusoproximal adhesive restorations, effect of dentin moisture after acid etching. Minerva Stomatologica. 2009; 58:593-600
Reis A, Pellizzaro A, Dal-Bianco K, Gones OM, Patzlaff R, Loguercio AD. Impact of adhesive application to wet and dry dentin on long-term resin-dentin bond strengths. Oper Dent. 2007; 32:380-387
Dunne SM, Davies BR, Millar BJ. A survey of the effectiveness of dental light-curing units and a comparison of light testing devices. Br Dent J. 1996; 180:411-416
Mitton BA, Wilson NHF. The use and maintenance of visible light activating units in general practice. Br Dent J. 2001; 191:82-86
Knight JS, Fraughn R, Norrington D. Effect of temperature on the flow properties of resin composite. Gen Dent. 2006; 54:14-16
Wagner WC, Aksu MN, Neme AM, Linger JB, Pink FE, Walker S. Effect of pre-heating resin composite on restoration microleakage. Oper Dent. 2008; 33:72-78
El-Korashy D. Post-gel shrinkage strain and degree of conversion of preheated resin composite cured using different regimens. Oper Dent. 2010; 35:725-731
Prasanna N, Pallavi Reddy Y, Kavitha S, Lakshmi Narayanan L. Degree of conversion and residual stress of preheated and room-temperature composites. Ind J Dent Res. 2007; 18:173-176
Mizrahi B. A technique for simple and aesthetic treatment of anterior toothwear. Dent Update. 2004; 31:109-114
Dietschi D. Optimising aesthetics and facilitating clinical application of free-hand bonding using the ‘natural layering concept.’. Br Dent J. 2008; 204:181-185
Botta AC, Duarte S, Paulin Filho PI, Gheno SM. Effect of dental finishing instruments on the surface roughness of composite resins as elucidated by atomic force microscopy. Microscop Microanal. 2008; 14:380-386
Maresca C, Pimenta LA, Heymann HO, Ziemecki TL, Ritter AV. Effect of finishing instrumentation on the marginal integrity of resin-based composite restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2010; 22:104-112
A number of modern materials are available which allow placement of highly aesthetic anterior restorations. However, some systems are complex and technique sensitive. The authors describe a layering technique for the provision of direct aesthetic anterior composite restorations suitable for a general practice setting.
Clinical Relevance: Aesthetic restorations can be provided directly and in a conservative manner using composite resin, often avoiding the need for more destructive indirect techniques.
Article
Resin composite provides the most aesthetic direct restorative material for restoring teeth. Composites offer the opportunity for minimal preparation compared to more destructive indirect alternatives. Some composite materials are specifically intended to be used to build layered restorations, eg Miris (Coltène/Whaledent, AG, Feldwiesenstrasse 20, 9450 Altstätten, Switzerland), Ceram X Duo (Dentsply, York, PA, USA), Enamel HFO (Micerium SpA, 16036 Avegno (Ge) Italy). Such composite systems differ from other composites in that they have different characteristics between the enamel and dentine composite shades.
Composite resins are available with a range of optical characteristics, having a range of translucencies and colours. Whilst in certain situations it may be feasible to create an adequate appearance by using a single composite shade, composite systems intended for layered restorations are composed of distinct enamel and dentine shades. The difference between the enamel and dentine composite is marked with a high opacity and chroma for dentine shades and high translucency and low chroma for enamel (Tables 1 and 2).
Register now to continue reading
Thank you for visiting Dental Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits: