Cobb DS, MacGregor KM, Vargas MA, Denehy GE. The physical properties of packable and conventional posterior resin-based composites: a comparison. J Am Dent Assoc. 2000; 131:1610-1615
Herrero AA, Yaman P, Dennison JB. Polymerization shrinkage and depth of cure of packable composites. Quintessence Int. 2005; 36:25-31
Ernst CP, Price RB, Callaway A, Masek A Visible light curing devices – irradiance and use in 302 German dental offices. J Adhes Dent. 2018; 20:41-55
Santini A, Turner S. General dental practitioners' knowledge of polymerisation of resin-based composite restorations and light curing unit technology. Br Dent J. 2011; 211
Leprince JG, Palin WM, Hadis MA Progress in dimethacrylate-based dental composite technology and curing efficiency. Dent Mater. 2013; 29:139-156
Palin WM, Leprince JG, Hadis MA. Shining a light on high volume photocurable materials. Dent Mater. 2018; 34:695-710
Shortall AC, Price RB, MacKenzie LM, Burke FJT. Guidelines for the selection, use, and maintenance of LED light-curing units – Part 1. Br Dent J. 2016; 221:453-460
Price RB, Ferracane JL, Shortall AC. Light-curing units: a review of what we need to know. J Dent Res. 2015; 94:1179-1186
De Souza GM, El-Badrawy W, Tam LE. Effect of training method on dental students' light-curing performance. J Dent Educ. 2018; 82:864-871
Ogunyinka A, Palin WM, Shortall AC, Marquis PM. Photoinitiation chemistry affects light transmission and degree of conversion of curing experimental dental resin composites. Dent Mater. 2007; 23:807-813
Schmalz G. Biocompatibility of dental materials. In: Schmalz GA (ed). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag; 2009
Zach L, Cohen G. Pulp response to externally applied heat. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1965; 19:515-530
Mackenzie LM, Waplington M, Bonsor SJ. Splendid isolation: a practical guide to the use of rubber dam part 1. Dent Update. 2020; 47:548-558
Sadeghyar A, Watts DC, Schedle A. Limited reciprocity in curing efficiency of bulk-fill resin-composites. Dent Mater. 2020; 36:997-1008
Palagummi SV, Hong T, Wang Z Resin viscosity determines the condition for a valid exposure reciprocity law in dental composites. Dent Mater. 2020; 36:310-319
Hadis M, Leprince JG, Shortall AC High irradiance curing and anomalies of exposure reciprocity law in resin-based materials. J Dent. 2011; 39:549-557
Harlow JE, Sullivan B, Shortall AC Characterizing the output settings of dental curing lights. J Dent. 2016; 44:20-26
Kim JW, Jang KT, Lee SH Effect of curing method and curing time on the microhardness and wear of pit and fissure sealants. Dent Mater. 2002; 18:120-127
Deb S, Sehmi H. A comparative study of the properties of dental resin composites polymerized with plasma and halogen light. Dent Mater. 2003; 19:517-522
Kutuk ZB, Gurgan S, Hickel R, Ilie N. Influence of extremely high irradiances on the micromechanical properties of a nano hybrid resin based composite. Am J Dent. 2017; 30:9-15
Park HY, Kloxin CJ, Abuelyaman AS Stress relaxation via addition-fragmentation chain transfer in high T(g), high conversion methacrylate-based systems. Macromolecules. 2012; 45:5640-5646
Gorsche C, Griesser M, Gescheidt G B-allyl sulfones as addition fragmentation chain transfer reagents: a tool for adjusting thermal and mechanical properties of dimethacrylate networks. Macromolecules. 2014; 47:7327-7336
Shah PK, Stansbury JW, Bowman CN. Application of an addition-fragmentation-chain transfer monomer in di(meth)acrylate network formation to reduce polymerization shrinkage stress. Polym Chem. 2017; 8:4339-4351
Ilie N, Watts DC. Outcomes of ultra-fast (3 s) photo-cure in a RAFT-modified resin-composite. Dent Mater. 2020; 36:570-579
Algamaiah H, Silikas N, Watts DC. Conversion kinetics of rapid photo-polymerized resin composites. Dent Mater. 2020; 36:1266-1274
Chan KHS, Mai Y, Kim H Review: resin composite filling. Materials. 2010; 3:1228-1243
Shortall AC, Price RB, MacKenzie L, Burke FJT. Guidelines for the selection, use, and maintenance of LED light-curing units – Part II. Br Dent J. 2016; 221:551-554
Christensen G. Should your next curing light be an online bargain?. Clinicians Report, CR Foundation. 2013; 6:1-3
AlShaafi MM, Harlow JE, Price HL Emission characteristics and effect of battery drain in ‘budget’ curing lights. Oper Dent. 2016; 41:397-408
Solomon CS, Osman YI. Evaluating the efficacy of curing lights. SADJ. 1999; 54:357-362
Mitton BA, Wilson NH. The use and maintenance of visible light activating units in general practice. Br Dent J. 2001; 191:82-86
Roberts JE. Screening for ocular phototoxicity. Int J Toxicol. 2002; 21:491-500
Randolph L. Improving resin composites for dental restoration through the use of a novel photoinitiator.Louvain, Belgium: Universite Catholique de Louvain; 2017
Bonsor SJ, Pearson GJ. A Clinical Guide to Applied Dental Materials.Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2013
‘Let there be Light,’ and there was Light, but was it Enough? A Review of Modern Dental Light Curing Stephen J Bonsor William M Palin Dental Update 2024 48:8, 707-709.
Authors
Stephen JBonsor
BDS(Hons) MSc FHEA FDS RCPS(Glasg) FDFTEd FCGDent GDP
The Dental Practice, 21 Rubislaw Terrace, Aberdeen; Hon Senior Clinical Lecturer, Institute of Dentistry, University of Aberdeen; Online Tutor/Clinical Lecturer, University of Edinburgh, UK.
Light curing, or photopolymerization, is a very common method of effecting the set of resin-containing dental materials. This review summarizes key aspects that influence optimal photopolymerization, and how both a basic knowledge of chemistry and properties of the light-curing device are essential to achieve optimal clinical performance of the material. Tips are offered with respect to both the light-curing units and those materials which are cured by them to ensure best practice when working clinically.
CPD/Clinical Relevance: A thorough knowledge and understanding of photopolymerization is critical to clinicians given that many dental materials in contemporary use are cured by this means.
Article
Over recent years, a plethora of new light-curable, resin-containing restorative materials and dental light-curing devices or units (LCU) has been brought to the market. It is not always clear whether the ‘new’ technology will improve practice and restoration longevity, or whether it is merely an incremental step, or, at worst, inferior to the products that have used before. Furthermore, the profit margins of dental resin composite material and light manufacturers are relatively small given the huge investment costs of research and development for these technologies. Slick marketing by manufacturers within a finite window of opportunity is often key to maximize small profit margins before the next ‘new’ version is designed and marketed. This often results in materials and related technologies that become quickly defunct before there is a full understanding of how they might perform clinically in the long term, which presents a challenge for the dental practitioner in terms of material and device selection. For each new product, the dental team must ensure that they are using the material as intended by the manufacturer and, in the case of light-curable dental materials, it is imperative that the clinician fully understands the process of dental light curing. This review summarizes key aspects that influence optimal photopolymerization, and how both a basic knowledge of chemistry and the properties of the light-curing device are essential to achieve optimal clinical performance of the material.
Register now to continue reading
Thank you for visiting Dental Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits: