Switch to Dark theme

References

Ryge G, Snyder M. Evaluating the clinical quality of restorations. J Am Dent Assoc. 1973; 87:369-377
Hickel R, Peschke A, Tyas M, Mjör I, Bayne S, Peters M, Hiller KA, Randall R, Vanherle G, Heintze SD. FDI World Dental Federation: clinical criteria for the evaluation of direct and indirect restorations – update and clinical examples. Clin Oral Investig. 2010; 14:(4)349-366
Deligeorgi V, Wilson NH, Fouzas D, Kouklaki E, Burke FJ, Mjör IA. Reasons for placement and replacement of restorations in student clinics in Manchester and Athens. Eur J Dent Educ. 2000; 4:153-159
Manhart J, Chen H, Hamm G, Hickel R. Buonocore Memorial Lecture: Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition. Oper Dent. 2004; 5:481-508
Blum IR, Jagger DC, Wilson NH. Defective dental restorations: to repair or not to repair? Part 1: direct composite restorations. Dent Update. 2011; 38:78-84
Tyas MJ, Anusavice KJ, Frencken JE, Mount GJ. Minimal intervention dentistry – a review, FDI Commission Project 1–97. Int Dent J. 2000; 50:1-12
Moncada G, Fernández E, Martín J, Arancibia C, Mjör IA, Gordan VV. Increasing the longevity of restorations by minimal intervention: a two-year clinical trial. Oper Dent. 2008; 33:258-264
Setcos JC, Khosravi R, Wilson NH, Shen C, Yang M, Mjör IA. Repair or replacement of amalgam restorations: decisions at a USA and a UK dental school. Oper Dent. 2004; 29:392-397
Gordan VV, Mondragon E, Shen C. Replacement of resin-based composite: evaluation of cavity design, cavity depth, and shade matching. Quintessence Int. 2002; 33:(4)273-278
Banerjee A. “MI”opia or 20/20 vision?. Br Dent J. 2013; 214:101-105
Mackenzie L, Burke FJ, Shortall AC. Posterior composites: a practical guide revisited. Dent Update. 2012; 39:(3)211-216
Green DJ, Banerjee A. Contemporary adhesive bonding: bridging the gap between research and clinical practice. Dent Update. 2011; 38:439-450
Palotie U, Vehkalahti MM. Reasons for replacement of restorations: dentists' perceptions. Acta Odontol Scand. 2012; 70:485-490
McAndrew R, Chadwick B, Treasure ET. The influence of a short training program on the clinical examination of dental restorations. Oper Dent. 2011; 36:143-152
Bader JD, Shugars DA. Agreement among dentists' recommendations for restorative. J Dent Res. 1993; 72:891-896
Martin J, Fernandez E, Estay J, Gordan VV, Mjör IA, Moncada G. Management of Class I and Class II amalgam restorations with localized defects: five-year results. Int J Dent. 2013; 2013
Dörter C, Yildiz E, Erdemir U. Effect of operators' skills on increase in cavity volume of restorations. Quintessence Int. 2000; 34:(1)27-30
Burke FJ, Wilson NH, Cheung SW, Mjör IA. Influence of patient factors on age of restorations at failure and reasons for their placement and replacement. J Dent. 2001; 29:317-324
Sardenberg F, Bonifácio CC, Braga MM, Imparato JC, Mendes FM. Evaluation of the dental structure loss produced during maintenance and replacement of occlusal amalgam restorations. Braz Oral Res. 2008; 22:242-246
Lenzi TL, Marquezan M, Bonini GC, Camargo LB, Raggio DP. Repairing ditched amalgam restorations is less time and tooth structure-consuming than replacement. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2013; 14:345-349
NICE Clinical Guideline 19. Dental Recall Guidelines October 2004.
Moncada G, Martin J, Fernández E, Hempel MC, Mjör IA, Gordan VV. Sealing, refurbishment and repair of Class I and Class II defective restorations: a three-year clinical trial. J Am Dent Assoc. 2009; 140:425-432
Cardoso M, Baratieri LN, Ritter AV. The effect of finishing and polishing on the decision to replace existing amalgam restorations. Quintessence Int. 1999; 30:413-418
Fernández EM, Martin JA, Angel PA, Mjör IA, Gordan VV, Moncada GA. Survival rate of sealed, refurbished and repaired defective restorations: 4-year follow-up. Braz Dent J. 2011; 22:134-139
Roberts HW, Charlton DG, Murchison DF. Repair of non-carious amalgam margin defects. Oper Dent. 2001; 26:273-276
Roggenkamp CL, Berry FA, Lu H. In vitro bond strengths of amalgam added to existing amalgams. Oper Dent. 2010; 35:314-323
Fruits TJ, Duncanson MG, Coury TL. Interfacial bond strengths of amalgam bonded to amalgam and resin composite bonded to amalgam. Quintessence Int. 1998; 29:327-334
Shen C, Speigel J, Mjör IA. Repair strength of dental amalgams. Oper Dent. 2006; 31:122-126
Leelawat C, Scherer W, Chang J, Vijayaraghavan T, LeGeros J. Bonding fresh amalgam to existing amalgam: a shear and flexural strength study. J Esthet Dent. 1992; 4:(2)46-49
Jessup JP, Vandewalle KS, Hermesch CB, Buikema DJ. Effects of surface treatments on amalgam repair. Oper Dent. 1998; 23:15-20
Giannini M, Paulillo LA, Ambrosano GM. Effect of surface roughness on amalgam repair using adhesive systems. Braz Dent J. 2002; 13:179-183
Özcan M, Koolman C, Aladag A, Dündar M. Effects of different surface conditioning methods on the bond strength of resin composite to amalgam. Oper Dent. 2011; 36:318-325
Özcan M, Schoonbeek G, Gökçe B, Cömlekoglu E, Dündar M. Bond strength comparison of amalgam repair protocols using resin composite in situations with and without dentin exposure. Oper Dent. 2010; 35:655-662
Popoff DA, Gonçalves FS, Magalhães CS, Moreira AN, Ferreira RC, Mjör IA. Repair of amalgam restorations with resin composite and bonded amalgam: a microleakage study. Ind J Dent Res. 2011; 22:799-803
Özcan M, Salihoğlu-Yener E. A technical report on repair of amalgam-dentin complex. Oper Dent. 2011; 36:(5)563-566
Özcan M, Vallittu PK, Huysmans MC, Kalk W, Vahlberg T. Bond strength of resin composite to differently conditioned amalgam. J Mat Sci: Maters Med. 2006; 17:(1)7-13
Cehreli SB, Arhun N, Celik C. Amalgam repair: quantitative evaluation of amalgam-resin and resin-tooth interfaces with different surface treatments. Oper Dent. 2010; 35:337-344
Zoergiebel J, Ilie N. Evaluation of a conventional glass ionomer cement with new zinc formulation: effect of coating, aging and storage agents. Clin Oral Investig. 2013; 17:(2)619-626
Wu CH, Smales RJ. Occlusal wear of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement following three surface treatments. Clin Oral Investig. 2001; 5:26-30
Ivanovas S, Hickel R, Ilie N. How to repair fillings made by silorane-based composites. Clin Oral Investig. 2011; 15:915-922
Özcan M, Corazza PH, Marocho SM, Barbosa SH, Bottino MA. Repair bond strength of microhybrid, nanohybrid and nanofilled resin composites: effect of substrate resin type, surface conditioning and ageing. Clin Oral Investig. 2013; 17:1751-1758
Rathke A, Tymina Y, Haller B. Effect of different surface treatments on the composite-composite repair bond strength. Clin Oral Investig. 2009; 13:317-323
Dall'Oca S, Papacchini F, Goracci C, Cury AH, Suh BI, Tay FR, Polimeni A, Ferrari M. Effect of oxygen inhibition on composite repair strength over time. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2007; 81:493-498
Gordan VV, Garvan CW, Richman JS, Fellows JL, Rindal DB, Qvist V, Heft MW, Williams OD, Gilbert GH How dentists diagnose and treat defective restorations: evidence from the dental practice-based research network. Oper Dent. 2009; 34:664-673
Pelka MA, Altmaier K, Petschelt A, Lohbauer U. The effect of air-polishing abrasives on wear of direct restoration materials and sealants. J Am Dent Assoc. 2010; 1:63-70
Papacchini F, Radovic I, Magni E, Goracci C, Monticelli F, Chieffi N, Polimeni A, Ferrari M. Flowable composites as intermediate agents without adhesive application in resin composite repair. Am J Dent. 2008; 21:53-58
Özcan M, Alander P, Vallittu PK, Huysmans MC, Kalk W. Effect of three surface conditioning methods to improve bond strength of particulate filler resin composites. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2005; 16:21-27
Özcan M, Pekkan G. Effect of different adhesion strategies on bond strength of resin composite to composite-dentin complex. Oper Dent. 2013; 38:63-72
Loomans BA, Cardoso MV, Roeters FJ, Opdam NJ, De Munck J, Huysmans MC, Van Meerbeek B. Is there one optimal repair technique for all composites?. Dent Mater. 2011; 27:701-709
Staxrud F, Dahl JE. Role of bonding agents in the repair of resin composite restorations. Eur J Oral Sci. 2011; 119:316-322
Hickel R, Brüshaver K, Ilie N. Repair of restorations – criteria for decision making and clinical recommendations. Dent Mater. 2013; 29:28-50
Papacchini F, Magni E, Radovic I, Mazzitelli C, Monticellia F, Goracci C, Polimeni A, Ferrari M. Effect of intermediate agents and pre-heating of repairing resin on composite-repair bonds. Oper Dent. 2007; 32:363-371
Baur V, Ilie N. Repair of dental resin-based composites. Clin Oral Investig. 2013; 17:601-608
Shaffer RA, Charlton DG, Hermesch CB. Repairability of three resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative materials. Oper Dent. 1998; 23:(4)168-172
Maneenut C, Sakoolnamarka R, Tyas MJ. The repair potential of resin-modified glass-ionomer cements. Dent Mater. 2010; 26:(7)659-665
Pearson GJ, Bowen G, Jacobsen P, Atkinson AS. The flexural strength of repaired glass-ionomer cements. Dent Mater. 1989; 5:(1)10-12
Jamaluddin A, Pearson GJ. SEM analyses of repaired glass-ionomer cements. Asian J Aesthet Dent. 1993; 1:(1)19-23
Banerjee A, Watson T., 9th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011

Minimally invasive long-term management of direct restorations: the ‘5 rs’

From Volume 42, Issue 5, June 2015 | Pages 413-426

Authors

David Green

BDS (Hons) BSc (Hons) MSc (Res) MFDS RCS (Ed) MRD (Prostho) RCS (Eng) FDS (Rest)

BDS(Hons) BSc(Hons) MSc(Res) MFDS RCS (Ed) MRD Pros RCS (Eng) FDS (Rest Dent) RCS, Specialist in Prosthodontics, Consultant in Restorative Dentistry and Associate Professor in Restorative Dentistry; Birmingham Dental Hospital

Articles by David Green

Louis Mackenzie

BDS, FDS RCPS FCGDent, Head Dental Officer, Denplan UK, Andover

General Dental Practitioner, Birmingham; Clinical Lecturer, University of Birmingham School of Dentistry, Birmingham, UK.

Articles by Louis Mackenzie

Avijit Banerjee

BDS, MSc, PhD (Lond), LDS, FDS (Rest Dent), FDSRCS (Eng), FCGDent, FHEA, FICD

Professor of Cariology & Operative Dentistry, Hon Consultant in Restorative Dentistry, King's College London Dental Institute at Guy's Hospital, KCL, King's Health Partners, London, UK

Articles by Avijit Banerjee

Abstract

The assessment and operative long-term management of direct restorations is a complex and controversial subject in conservative dentistry. Employing a minimally invasive (MI) approach helps preserve natural tooth structure and maintain endodontic health for as long as possible during the restorative cycle. This paper discusses how minimally invasive techniques may be applied practically to reviewing, resealing, refurbishing, repairing or replacing deteriorating/failed direct coronal restorations (the ‘5 Rs’) and provides an update of contemporary MI clinical procedures.

CPD/Clinical Relevance: The assessment and long-term clinical management of deteriorating/failing direct restorations is a major component of the general dental practice workload and NHS UK budget expenditure for operative dentistry.

Article

A failing restoration can be described as one that has suffered biomechanical defect or damage resulting in immediate or subsequent detrimental clinical consequences to the patient. This may affect the restoration alone (eg bulk fracture, staining etc), the supporting tooth structure (eg fractured cusps, new caries at the tooth-restoration surface (CARS) etc) or, more commonly, both, affecting the collective tooth-restoration complex. Such failure can present as obvious fractures of this complex, possibly detectable active caries associated with restoration/sealant surface (CARS, previously described as secondary or recurrent caries) or can be more subtle, such as marginal discoloration of an anterior aesthetic resin composite restoration or marginal ditching of a posterior restoration.

A number of clinical indices have been developed to help classify the extent of restoration failure, including the Ryge & Snyder Index (1973), useful for research analysis as well as clinical management (summarized in Table 1).1 A more recent classification by Hickel et al (2010) defined the clinical criteria for the evaluation of direct and indirect restorations.2 This index includes three separate groups:

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Dental Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Up to 2 free articles per month
  • New content available

Already have an account? Sign in here