References

Diniz M, Lima L, Eckert G, Zandona AF, Cordeiro R, Pinto LS. In vitro evaluation of ICDAS and radiographic examination of occlusal surfaces and their association with treatment decisions. Oper Dent. 2011; 36:(2)133-142
Gilbert GH, Litaker MS, Pihlstrom DJ, Amundson CW, Gordan VV. Rubber dam use during routine operative dentistry procedures: findings from the Dental PBRN. Oper Dent. 2010; 35:(5)491-499
Hamilton JC, Krestik KE, Dennison JB. Evaluation of custom occlusal matrix technique for posterior light-cured composites. Oper Dent. 1998; 23:303-307
Geddes A, Craig J, Chadwick RG. Preoperative occlusal matrix aids the development of occlusal contour of posterior occlusal resin composite restorations – clinical rationale and technique. Br Dent J. 2009; 206:(6)315-317
Banerjee A, Watson TF, Kidd EA. Dentine caries excavation: a review of current clinical techniques. Br Dent J. 2000; 188:(9)476-482
Banerjee A, Kidd EA, Watson TF. In vitro validation of carious dentin removed using different excavation criteria. Am J Dent. 2003; 16:(4)228-230
Banerjee A, Watson TF, Kidd EA. Dentine caries: take it or leave it?. Dent Update. 2000; 27:(6)272-276
Ericson D, Kidd E, McComb D, Mjör I, Noack MJ. Minimally Invasive Dentistry – concepts and techniques in cariology. Oral Health Prev Dent. 2003; 1:(1)59-72
Mackenzie LM, Shortall ACC, Burke FJT. Direct posterior composites: a practical guide. Dent Update. 2009; 36:71-95
Ilie N, Hickel R. Investigations on a methacrylate-based flowable composite based on the SDR™ technology. Dent Mater. 2011; 27:(4)348-355
Burke FJT, Crisp RJ, Mackenzie L. Handling evaluation of Dentsply SDR. The Dentist. 2010; 26:(9)94-100

Posterior composites: a practical guide revisited

From Volume 39, Issue 3, April 2012 | Pages 211-216

Authors

Louis Mackenzie

BDS, FDS RCPS FCGDent, Head Dental Officer, Denplan UK, Andover

General Dental Practitioner, Birmingham; Clinical Lecturer, University of Birmingham School of Dentistry, Birmingham, UK.

Articles by Louis Mackenzie

FJ Trevor Burke

DDS, MSc, MDS, MGDS, FDS (RCS Edin), FDS RCS (Eng), FCG Dent, FADM,

Articles by FJ Trevor Burke

Adrian CC Shortall

DDS, BDS

Reader in Restorative Dentistry, University of Birmingham School of Dentistry, St Chad's Queensway, Birmingham B4 6NN, UK

Articles by Adrian CC Shortall

Abstract

Direct placement resin composite is revolutionizing the restoration of posterior teeth. Compared to amalgam, its use not only improves aesthetics but, more importantly, promotes a minimally invasive approach to cavity preparation. Despite the benefits, the use of composite to restore load-bearing surfaces of molar and premolar teeth is not yet universally applied. This may be due to individual practitioner concerns over unpredictability, time and the fact that procedures remain technique sensitive for many, particularly with regard to moisture control, placement and control of polymerization shrinkage stress. New materials, techniques and equipment are available that may help to overcome many of these concerns. This paper describes how such techniques may be employed in the management of a carious lesion on the occlusal surface of an upper molar.

Clinical Relevance: Direct posterior composite is the treatment of choice for the conservative restoration of primary carious lesions.

Article

Detection and diagnosis

A Class I carious lesion (ICDAS 3)1 was detected in the mesial pit of an upper second molar (Figure 1). The lesion was diagnosed as active with respect to enamel cavitation exposing dentine. In addition the patient's dietary habits, oral hygiene measures and the presence of active lesions elsewhere indicated the need for operative intervention.

Figure 1. A cavitated Class I carious lesion in an upper second molar.

Isolation

Placement of direct restorations in the molar regions can present difficulty with regard to moisture control. Use of rubber dam with a single hole and a versatile winged molar clamp (Hygenic 12A, Coltène-Whaledent, Switzerland)) provided rapid isolation, which was completed (Figure 2) by flossing the dam through the mesial contact point. The speed with which this technique achieves isolation and promotes a comfortable experience for the patient and a predicable outcome for the operator cannot be overemphasized. Although the vast majority of practitioners do not routinely use rubber dam,2 the isolation of a single tooth for an occlusal restoration is a perfect starting point for those wishing to learn and refine rubber dam techniques.

Figure 2. Isolation.

Occlusal template

As carious demineralization had left the occlusal surface virtually intact, in this case a template was used to facilitate provision of an anatomically accurate final restoration. Fabrication of a template may be achieved using a pre-operative impression gained by injecting a small amount of a clear polyvinyl siloxane material (Memosil 2, Heraeus Kulzer, Germany) onto the occlusal surface3,4 (Figure 3). After waiting for the material to partially set, finger pressure (Figure 4) was applied to accurately capture the occlusal morphology. Once set, the template was removed (Figure 5) and the mesial surface marked with a felt pen to assist orientation when reapplied later.

Figure 3. Template material injected on to the occlusal surface.
Figure 4. Template material adapted to capture occlusal morphology.
Figure 5. Pre-operative template.

Access

Using a small round bur, access to the carious lesion was gained through the cavitated pit and extended only to allow visualization and assessment of underlying dentinal caries. (Figure 6).

Figure 6. Access to lesion.

Minimally invasive preparation

Using appropriate burs, peripheral caries excavation was carried out to remove soft carious dentine and fragile overhanging enamel only. Pulpal caries was then excavated using a hand excavator and extended only until there was moderate resistance to gentle excavation5,6,7 (Figure 7).

Figure 7. Cavity preparation complete.

Removal of only irreversibly demineralized tooth tissue is a fundamental aim of contemporary caries management,57 as it maximizes the amount of residual healthy tooth tissue59 and improves the prognosis for long-term pulpal health by minimizing trauma to the dentine/pulp complex.57

Etching

Phosphoric acid (37%) was used to etch the whole cavity and 1mm beyond the margins (Figure 8).

Figure 8. Acid etch applied.

Etch 37 (Bisco Inc, Schaumburg, IL, USA) was chosen as it flows easily into undercut cavity forms. Etching was further optimized by agitating the etchant with an appropriate instrument.

Wash and dry

After 15 seconds the etchant was thoroughly washed off. The cavity was then dried with gentle airflow, taking care not to desiccate the dentine. The aim is to achieve a visibly moist dentine cavity floor (and walls) with no obvious pooling of water.9 When total etch adhesive systems are employed, careful control of dentine moisture is essential for optimization of adhesion and prevention of post-operative sensitivity. While the ‘frosty’ appearance of enamel walls is a reassuring sign that a predictable enamel bond (and thus marginal seal) will be achieved (Figure 9), it may also signal an increased likelihood of over dry dentine. If dentine desiccation is suspected it may be rehydrated with water,9 applied using an appropriate brush.

Figure 9. Etched cavity after washing/drying.

Adhesive

Adhesive (XP Bond, Dentsply International Inc, York, PA, USA) was applied to the whole cavity and just beyond the margins, using a Microbrush (Microbrush international Grafton, US). Gentle airflow was then used until no ripples were evident. This reduced the likelihood of adhesive pooling and confirmed that the solvent had evaporated. The adhesive was then light-cured for 40 seconds with the light tip as close to the cavity as possible. The cavity was inspected to ensure that a uniform glossy/shiny adhesive layer coated the entire cavity9 (Figure 10).

Figure 10. Adhesive applied.

Placement (‘dentine layer’)

In this case, the entire ‘dentine layer’ was restored in one increment, using a flowable composite designed for this purpose (SDR™, Smart Dentine Replacement, Dentsply International Inc, York, PA, USA) (Figure 11).

Figure 11. Bulk-fill restoration of ‘dentine layer’ using SDR™.

SDR™ (Figure 12) is an innovative flowable posterior composite offering a number of potential benefits with regard to reducing placement technique sensitivity:

Figure 12. SDR™ compule.
  • Flowable consistency and ‘self-levelling’ property optimizes marginal adaptation into undercut cavities;
  • Cannula delivery obviates the need for instrumentation, thus reducing the tendency for marginal voids and layers between increments;
  • Translucency of the material facilitates depth of cure up to 4 mm in one increment;
  • Reported low polymerization shrinkage stress10 reduces the risk of post-operative sensitivity that is usually associated with bulk-fill techniques;
  • Restoration of the majority of the cavity in one increment has a significant time-saving benefit;11
  • The technique is easy to learn and simple to use;11
  • The SDR™ layer was then light-cured for 20 seconds.

    Placement (‘Enamel layer’)

    A single increment of a traditional hybrid composite was then placed over the layer of SDR™, which is not designed to restore right up to the occlusal surface as a result of:

  • Inferior optical properties conveyed by the material's translucency;
  • Wear resistance lower than that of a conventional hybrid composite.
  • Care was taken to apply just the right amount of hybrid material (Figure 13) to minimize excess and prevent under fill that would increase the tendency for poor marginal adaptation and void formation.

    Figure 13. ‘Enamel’ increment of hybrid composite applied.

    Use of the template

    To facilitate adaptation and shaping of the final increment, the pre-operative occlusal template was applied to the unset material (Figure 14). The light tip was then firmly applied to the translucent template during a (minimum) 60 second light-cure (Figure 15).

    Figure 14. Template re-applied to adapt final composite increment.
    Figure 15. Composite light-cured through template.

    This technique has three main benefits:4

  • Application of the template may reduce the potential for oxygen inhibition of the polymerization reaction occurring on the surface of the restoration;
  • The morphology of the original occlusal surface is accurately reproduced;
  • A significant amount of time may be saved when this technique is employed. (Although this may be cancelled out by the time taken to make the template3).
  • Light-cure

    Once the template was removed the restoration received a further 60 seconds light-cure to maximize polymerization (Figure 16).

    Figure 16. Further light-curing.

    Excess removal

    The restoration was inspected for marginal excess (Figure 17), which was easily removed from unetched enamel using a sharp hand instrument. (Note: Careful volume estimation of the final increment will reduce or even eliminate this stage).

    Figure 17. Minimal excess for removal.

    Occlusal check

    Articulating paper was used to confirm that the restoration conformed precisely to the patients pre-existing occlusal scheme, in both the intercuspal position and all excursions (Figure 18).

    Figure 18. Occlusal check.

    Finished restoration

    The restoration was inspected (Figure 19). At this stage the surface may be refined, polished or coated with a solvent-free surface sealer, depending on operator preference.9

    Figure 19. Completed restoration.

    Review

    At review (interval based on caries risk or, as in this case, need for further dentistry) all aspects of the completed restoration were studied (Figure 20).

    Figure 20. Review.

    Discussion

    Direct posterior composite restorations offer many benefits to both patient and dentist that go far beyond the fact that the restorations are tooth-coloured. New materials, equipment and techniques will continue to improve the quality, predictability and success of direct composite restorations. Such methods will also promote minimally invasive caries management, maximizing the amount of tooth tissue preserved. This will increase the longevity, not of just the fillings placed, but of the teeth that they restore.

    Precise notation of the materials employed during each restorative procedure will provide each dentist with an invaluable evidence base for the long-term audit of their successful operative techniques.

    With patient consent, photographic images taken before, during and after operative procedures may be used as a powerful motivational tool to help explain the disease process when encouraging patients to reduce their caries risk and to demonstrate the benefits of modern minimally invasive dentistry.