References

Pace-Balzan A, Shaw RJ, Butterworth C Oral rehabilitation following treatment for oral cancer. Periodontology 2000. 2011; 57:102-117
Keyf F Obturator prostheses for hemimaxillectomy patients. J Oral Rehabil. 2001; 28:821-829
Alani A, Owens J, Dewan K, Summerwill A A national survey of oral and maxillofacial surgeons' attitudes towards the treatment and dental rehabilitation of oral cancer patients. Br Dent J. 2009; 207:540-541
Rogers SN, Lowe D, McNally D, Brown JS, Vaughan ED Health-related quality of life after maxillectomy: a comparison between prosthetic obturation and free flap. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003; 61:174-181
Worthington HV, Clarkson JE, Eden OB Interventions for preventing oral mucositis for patients with cancer receiving treatment. Cochrane Database Syst Revs. 2006; CD000978-CD000978
Marx RE A new concept in the treatment of osteoradionecrosis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1983; 41:351-357
Lyons A, Ghazali N Osteoradionecrosis of the jaws: current understanding of its pathophysiology and treatment. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008; 46:653-660
Delanian S, Lefaix JL The radiation-induced fibroatrophic process: therapeutic perspective via the antioxidant pathway. Radiother Oncol. 2004; 73:119-131
Harris M The conservative management of osteoradionecrosis of the mandible with ultrasound therapy. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1992; 30:313-318
Schwartz HC, Kagan AR Osteoradionecrosis of the mandible – scientific basis for clinical staging. Am J Clin Oncol-Cancer Clin Trials. 2002; 25:168-171
Nabil S, Samman N Incidence and prevention of osteoradionecrosis after dental extraction in irradiated patients: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011; 40:229-243
Reuther T, Schuster T, Mende U, Kubler A Osteoradionecrosis of the jaws as a side effect of radiotherapy of head and neck tumour patients – a report of a thirty year retrospective review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003; 32:289-295
Koga DH, Salvajoli JV, Alves FA Dental extractions and radiotherapy in head and neck oncology: review of the literature. Oral Dis. 2008; 14:40-44
Kayser AF Shortened dental arches and oral function. J Oral Rehabil. 1981; 8:457-462
Siddall KZ, Rogers SN, Butterworth CJ The prosthodontic pathway of the oral cancer patient. Dent Update. 2012; 39:98-106
Marx RE, Johnson RP Studies in the radiobiology of osteoradionecrosis and their clinical significance. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1987; 64:379-390
Clayman L Management of dental extractions in irradiated jaws: a protocol without hyperbaric oxygen therapy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1997; 55:275-281
Kielbassa AM, Hinkelbein W, Hellwig E, Meyer-Luckel H Radiation-related damage to dentition. Lancet Oncology. 2006; 7:326-335
Walter J Obturators for acquired palatal defects. Dent Update. 2005; 32:277-284
Beumer III, Curtis TA, Marunick MTSt Louis, Toronto, London: The CV Mosby Co; 1979
Zarb GA The maxillary resection and its prosthetic replacement. J Prosthet Dent. 1967; 18
Aramany MA Basic principles of obturator design for partially edentulous patients. Part I: Classification. J Prosthet Dent. 1978; 40:554-557
Parr GR, Tharp GE, Rahn AO Prosthodontic principles in the framework design of maxillary obturator prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 2005; 93:405-411
Kornblith AB, Zlotolow IM, Gooen J, Huryn JM, Lerner T, Strong EW Quality of life of maxillectomy patients using an obturator prosthesis. Head Neck-Journal Sci Special Head Neck. 1996; 18:323-334
Okay DJ, Genden E, Buchbinder D, Urken M Prosthodontic guidelines for surgical reconstruction of the maxilla: a classification system of defects. J Prosthet Dent. 2001; 86:352-363
Beumer J, Zlotolow I, Curtis TA, 3rd edn. Atlanta: American Cancer Society; 1990
Werning JWNew York: Thieme Medical Publishers Inc; 2007
List MA, Stracks J, Colangelo L, Butler P, Ganzenko N, Lundy D How do head and neck cancer patients prioritize treatment outcomes before initiating treatment?. J Clin Oncol. 2000; 18:877-884
Shah JP Dental oncology and maxillofacial prosthetics. In: Zlotolow IM Hamilton, Ontario, Canada: BC Decker Inc; 2001

Rehabilitation of oncology patients with hard palate defects part 1: the surgical planning phase

From Volume 42, Issue 4, May 2015 | Pages 326-335

Authors

Rahat Ali

BSc, BDS, MSc ClinDent(Rest), MFGDP(UK), MFDS RCS(Eng), PGC(HE), FDS(Rest Dent) RCSED, BSc, BDS, MSc ClinDent(Rest), MFGDP(UK), MFDS RCS(Eng), PGC(HE)

Consultant in Restorative Dentistry, Department of Restorative Dentistry

Articles by Rahat Ali

Email Rahat Ali

Asmaa Altaie

BDS, MSc, MFDS RCS

Clinical Teaching Fellow in Restorative Dentistry, Leeds Dental Institute, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK

Articles by Asmaa Altaie

Brian Nattress

BChD(Hons), PhD, FDSRCS Ed, MRD RCS Ed, FDTF Ed.

Senior Lecturer/Honorary Consultant in Restorative Dentistry, Leeds Dental Institute, Clarendon Way, Leeds, LS2 9LU, UK

Articles by Brian Nattress

Abstract

This article is the first in a series of three papers that will discuss the conventional non-implant retained prosthodontic rehabilitation of oncology patients with surgically acquired hard palate defects. In this first paper, the dental challenges posed by the oncology patients will briefly be discussed. The interface between the specialist restorative dentist and the maxillofacial surgeon when planning the conventional dental rehabilitation of an oncology patient with a hard palate defect will be discussed in detail.

Clinical Relevance: To highlight the importance of the restorative dentistry/surgical interface when planning a treatment for a patient requiring a maxillectomy and conventional obturation.

Article

Maxillary hard palate defects can be congenital or acquired in nature. Acquired palatal defects can be created by the surgical treatment of benign or malignant tumours. Although head and neck cancers are relatively rare in the UK (with 8000 new cases being reported per year),1 patients who present with such malignancy require careful planning and treatment. If the tumour is managed surgically, this treatment can have major effects on the physical, psychological and social wellbeing of these patients.2 Removal of the palate by ablative surgery creates a significant anatomical defect that allows the oral cavity, maxillary sinus, nasal cavity and nasopharnyx to become one confluent chamber. This has a significant impact on patients in terms of their ability to speak, swallow and chew. Food and liquids will pass from the oral cavity into the nasal cavity, making adequate feeding very difficult. Air escape from the oral cavity into the nasal passages can also create an unnatural hypernasal speech pattern.3 Furthermore, the presence of the defect can constantly (and adversely) remind patients of their experience with cancer. Management of the resected site can be by surgical reconstruction or prosthetic rehabilitation with an obturator.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Dental Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Up to 2 free articles per month
  • New content available