References

Dauphinee WD. Revalidation of Doctors in Canada. Br Med J. 1999; 319:1188-1190
Revalidation Consultation Paper. 2010;
HM Gov. Better Regulation – Dept for Business Innovation & Skills. 2010. http://www.bis.gov.uk/policies/bre/principles-of-regulation
Eve RichardOxford: Radcliffe Medical Press;
Pringle M, Bradley CP, Carmichael CM Significant event auditing. A study of the feasibility and potential of case-based auditing in primary medical care. Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract. 1995; (70)i-viii
: Faculty of Dental Surgery, Royal College of Surgeons of England;

Revalidation in primary care – a personal view

From Volume 39, Issue 9, November 2012 | Pages 610-612

Authors

Alasdair G Miller

BDS, FDS, FFGDP, F.AoME

Parkfield Dental Surgery, Taunton, Somerset TAI 4RL

Articles by Alasdair G Miller

Abstract

This article explores an approach to Revalidation based on the principles of quality assurance.

Clinical Relevance: The delivery of safe, effective clinical care is the goal of every practitioner and the use of appropriate quality assurance processes can promote this and, at the same time, meet the General Dental Council's likely requirements for Revalidation.

Article

The General Dental Council, in response to Government instruction, is working on plans to introduce Revalidation for the profession from about 2014.1 The General Medical Council introduced Revalidation in 2012. The Department of Health, in 2008, defined Revalidation as:

“…ensure that health professionals remain up to date and continue to demonstrate that they continue to meet the requirements of their professional regulator”2

The General Dental Council defines it as:

“…the means by which, in the future, registrants will be required to periodically demonstrate that they are up to date and compliant with our Standards for Dental Professionals3

The GDC, like the GMC, suggests that the appropriate cycle for Revalidation should be 5 years. It has advocated a 3-stage approach to Revalidation which follows the model used by the Canadian physicians4 and other healthcare groups (Table 1). The Canadian approach suggests that the process should be formative and benefit the registrant. It is believed that most registrants will be able to revalidate at Stage 1. The GDC, in its proposals in 2010, suggested that external verifiers are needed to assess evidence to recommend revalidation.5 Those working in salaried dental services, eg hospitals and community dental services, armed forces, already have appraisals and clinical performance management, and so an employee should be able to demonstrate that he/she is fit for Revalidation based on his/her annual review. The challenge is how primary dental care practitioners (NHS and independent), who do not normally have a formal review, can, in a timely cost-effective way, demonstrate that they meet the standards and so Revalidate.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Dental Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Up to 2 free articles per month
  • New content available