References

Al Quran FA, Al-Dwairi ZN. Torus palatinus and torus mandibularis in edentulous patients. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2006; 7:112-119
Telang LA, Telang A, Nerali J, Pradeep P. Tori in a Malaysian population: Morphological and ethnic variations. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2019; 11:107-112 https://doi.org/10.4103/jfo.jfds_66_19
Kerdpon D, Sirirungrojying S. A clinical study of oral tori in southern Thailand: prevalence and the relation to parafunctional activity. Eur J Oral Sci. 1999; 107:9-13 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0909-8836.1999.eos107103.x
Bertazzo-Silveira E, Stuginski-Barbosa J, Porporatti AL Association between signs and symptoms of bruxism and presence of tori: a systematic review. Clin Oral Investig. 2017; 21:2789-2799 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-017-2081-7
Che Ibrahim NH, Md Shukri N. Is it as dangerous as it looks?. Malays Fam Physician. 2017; 12:35-36
McCord JF, Grant AA. Pre-definitive treatment: rehabilitation prostheses. Br Dent J. 2000; 188:419-424 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4800500
Garcia-Garcia AS, Martinez-Gonzalez JM, Gomez-Font R Current status of the torus palatinus and torus mandibularis. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2010; 15:e353-360
Rastogi K, Verma SK, Bhushan R. Surgical removal of mandibular tori and its use as an autogenous graft. BMJ Case Rep. 2013; 2013 https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2012-008297
Friel T. The ‘anatomically difficult’ denturecase. Dent Update. 2014; 41:506-512 https://doi.org/10.12968/denu.2014.41.6.506
Jun JH, Peacock Z, Pogrel MA. Alveolar ridge augmentation using lingual tori. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010; 68:2906-2908 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2010.05.063
Barker D, Walls AW, Meechan JG. Ridge augmentation using mandibular tori. Br Dent J. 2001; 190:474-476 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4801009
Atwood DA. Reduction of residual ridges: a major oral disease entity. J Prosthet Dent. 1971; 26:266-279 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(71)90069-2
Leyssen W, Butt K, Walmsley AD. Is a ridge classification helpful when assessing edentulous patients?. Dent Update. 2020; 47:326-332
Jablonski RY, Patel J, Morrow LA. Complete dentures: an update on clinical assessment and management: part 2. Br Dent J. 2018; 225:933-939 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2018.1023

Flangeless horseshoe maxillary complete denture: a prosthodontic solution to maxillary tori

From Volume 49, Issue 8, September 2022 | Pages 689-691

Authors

Sandeep Pai

BDS, MFDS RCPSG

Dental Core Trainee Year 3, Birmingham Dental Hospital

Articles by Sandeep Pai

Email Sandeep Pai

Wouter Leyssen

BDS, MJDF, MSc

Specialty Dentist in Restorative Dentistry, Birmingham Community NHS Healthcare Foundation Trust

Articles by Wouter Leyssen

Abstract

Tori may present difficulties in achieving a retentive prosthesis with full palatal coverage. Management of tori in such cases may involve attempting to avoid coverage of the torus, providing relief over the torus, or surgical reduction/removal. This article presents a case where a patient who presented with a large maxillary torus was managed with a non-surgical approach, which enabled provision of a successful prosthesis. Dental practitioners could consider this approach for selected cases.

CPD/Clinical Relevance: Thorough prior planning and a modified denture design can be used to provide an effective clinical solution for maxillary and mandibular tori.

Article

Tori present in the maxilla (torus palatinus) or mandible (torus mandibularis). Their incidence varies depending on the surveyed population, varying between differing ethnicities and sexes, with an incidence of up to 66% reported, equal between males and females.1,2 The aetiology of tori are unclear;3 however, novel hypotheses state they occur more frequently in bruxists due to the effect of excessive loading on surrounding hard tissues.4 They are also reported to undergo dimensional changes over time, which may manifest as discomfort.5 Tori are benign bony exostosis that generally do not interfere with dental treatment unless a removable prosthesis is indicated, which would encroach onto or around the torus.

Tori may be circumvented by means of accepting the edentulous gaps, or providing an appropriate fixed restorative option depending on the patient's specific circumstances. Anatomical challenges cannot be dismissed entirely, however, in cases where a removable prosthesis requiring palatal or lingual connector coverage is required, because tori will require specific consideration when designing the connector. Thorough assessment of what can be achieved by conservative measures alone may allow the practitioner to provide a satisfactory solution for the patient, prior to considering a surgical approach outright.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Dental Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Up to 2 free articles per month
  • New content available