References

Hemmings K, Darbar U, Vaughan S. Tooth wear treated with composite restorations at an increased vertical dimension. Results at 30 months. J Prosthet Dent. 2000; 83:287-293
Al-Khayatt AS, Ray-Chaudhuri A, Poyser NJ, Briggs PF, Porter RW, Kelleher MG, Eliyas S. Direct composite restorations for the worn mandibular anterior dentition: a 7-year follow-up of a prospective randomised controlled split-mouth clinical trial. J Oral Rehabil. 2013; 40:389-401
Daoudi MF, Radford JR. Use of a matrix to form directly applied resin composite to restore worn anterior teeth. Dent Update. 2001; 28:512-514
Vailati F, Belser UC. Full-mouth adhesive rehabilitation of a severely eroded dentition: the three-step technique. Part 1. Eur J Esthet Dent. 2008; 3:30-44
Mackenzie L, Parmar D, Shortall AC, Burke FJ. Direct anterior composites: a practical guide. Dent Update. 2013; 40:297-317
Mehta SB, Francis S, Banerji S. A guided, conservative approach for the management of localized mandibular anterior tooth wear. Dent Update. 2016; 43:106-112

An innovative guided direct composite resin restoration technique for managing tooth surface loss and dental anomalies

From Volume 45, Issue 11, December 2018 | Pages 1084-1085

Authors

Mojtaba Dorri

DDS, MSc, PhD, FHEA

Clinical Lecturer in Restorative Dentistry, Bristol Dental School, Lower Maudlin Street, Bristol BS1 2LY, UK

Articles by Mojtaba Dorri

Article

Direct composite resin restorations are increasingly being recommended as a minimally invasive treatment option for oral rehabilitation in patients with tooth wear or inherited dental anomalies, eg microdontia, amelogenesis imperfecta. These restorations are relatively economical compared to cast restorations and reversible, with high survival rates of up to 90%.1, 2

A major drawback for this treatment is the time required for building up several affected teeth with composite resin. Apart from increasing the cost of treatment, the lengthy procedure makes it unsuitable for less co-operative patients (eg children) and those with special needs who, due to physical or mental conditions, find it difficult to co-operate throughout treatment. Studies showed that longer procedural time results in poorer survival rates at seven years.2 These two factors may negatively affect the survival rate or aesthetic outcomes or, in some cases, may result in the treatment being denied.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Dental Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Up to 2 free articles per month
  • New content available