References

General Dental Council. Standards for the dental team. Guidance 4.1. 2013. https://standards.gdc-uk.org/Assets/pdf/Standards%20for%20the%20Dental%20Team.pdf (accessed February 2022)
NHS England. Dental record keeping standards: a consensus approach. 2019. http://www.england.nhs.uk/publication/dental-record-keeping-standards-a-consensus-approach/ (accessed February 2022)
Care Quality Commission. Guidance for providers on meeting the regulations. Regulation 20 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. 2015. http://www.cqc.org.uk/sites/default/files/20150210_guidance_for_providers_on_meeting_the_regulations_final_01.pdf (accessed February 2022)
Faculty of General Dental Practice (UK). Guidelines: clinical examination and record keeping. Good practice guidelines. 2016. https://cgdent.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Clinical-examination-and-record-keeping-3e-final-text.pdf (accessed February 2022)
Faculty of General Dental Practice (UK). Selection criteria for dental radiography. 2018. https://cgdent.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/FGDP-SCDR-ALL-Web.pdf (accessed February 2022)

Technique Tips: Improving record keeping and patient safety

From Volume 49, Issue 3, March 2022 | Page 273

Authors

Sukhdeep Murbay

BDS(Manc), FDS(Lond), MFGDP(Lond), MJDF(Lond), MGDS, RCS(Ireland), MSc(Lond), ILM(Lond), FFGDP(Lond), Cert Ment RCS Eng, FICD

Private Practice, Camana Bay, Cayman Islands

Articles by Sukhdeep Murbay

Email Sukhdeep Murbay

Article

As part of our on-going continual care for our patients, within the profession, we are required to have complete and accurate well-documented records.1,2,3,4,5 This technique tip complements such records.

Case report

A 68-year-old man presented with a mobile tooth in the upper right quadrant (URQ). There was no soreness, swelling or discharge. He was medically fit and healthy, with no medications or known allergies. I/O: mobility – Class 2, periodontally involved. The radiograph showed a horizontal fracture in the mid to apical third, but there was no history of trauma.

The patient was shown the radiograph and it was explained that the tooth had poor prognosis, and ultimately, would require an extraction. It was also explained that, owing to the nature of the horizontal fracture, the tooth might require removal in sections. There were discussions with the patient about possible complications. The proximity of the tooth to the maxillary sinus meant that there was the possibility of an oro-antral fistula, which, if it occurred and was minimal, would be managed by the clinician on review, but if more severe, then referral to secondary care or to a specialist would be necessary. Local measures should be taken, such as the avoidance of excessive exertion, such as sneezing or coughing. Suturing of the area was a possibility. Other complications, such as the possibility of pain, swelling, bruising, trismus, bleeding and infection were also mentioned. The patient fully consented to treatment.

On extracting the tooth, as expected, the coronal and distal aspect of the tooth were easily removed. The mesial root was then gently elevated out. The whole tooth was successfully extracted with no other complications. A photograph was taken to show the whole tooth. The extracted tooth and the root fragment were located into position. The photographs complimented the comprehensive documentation of the tooth being fully extracted, and also eliminated the potential need for taking another radiograph. As the saying goes ‘A picture speaks a thousand word,’ thus can help in our duty to have complete and accurate, well-documented records.

Figure 1. Long cone peri-apical radiograph of the URQ.
Figure 2. Photograph of the extracted tooth and the root.