Article
Designs for resin-bonded bridges (also known as resin-retained bridges) have evolved since their first incarnation as the Rochette bridge, progressing to the Maryland design in order to improve micromechanical retention and longevity of the bridge.1 Resin cements allow chemical adhesion of the wings to the etched enamel of the tooth, but mechanical retention is also desirable to help protect the bond. In this regard, it is also important to consider that any bridge should rely more on the preparation of the tooth and shape of the units, rather than the cement used.1
The choice of material and design should be made for the patient, depending on the purpose of bridge, the occlusion, previous treatment and anatomy of the teeth (both crown and roots). Traditionally, resin-bonded bridges are minimally invasive so, in many situations, these present a good treatment option for replacing missing teeth for functional or aesthetic reasons, with minimal compromise to the abutment teeth.1 A recent publication has indicated good survival rates for resin-bonded bridges.2 Other evidence suggests that resin-bonded bridge survival at 5 years is 87%, with failures mostly due to debonding, especially anteriorly.3,4 Biological complications, such as periodontitis or caries, also caused failure, but these statistically were much lower than debonding.3,4
Consideration of bridge design is important for each patient as an individual. In most instances, a cantilever design is most effective,5 unless there is a large pontic span (as this is more likely to debond due to additional stresses) or for use as an orthodontic splint anteriorly (as in the case presented in Figure 1 in which Emax (Ivoclar Vivadent, Leichtenstein) was used). For this particular patient, due to the short crown and root height of the canines and central incisors, numerous catastrophic failures of previous Maryland bridges and the orthodontic treatment which had been undertaken, it was decided to use a fixed-fixed design for the Emax bridge. The fixed-fixed design also facilitated orthodontic retention. In this case, the patient had an anterior open bite, so that there was no need to create space for the retaining wings. Minimal preparation, however, was carried out in order to create parallel sides of the crowns, to aid resistance and retention form, and allow the wings to wrap around the teeth as much as possible in order to achieve maximum coverage.
However, given the unique nature of the resin-bonded bridge and its reliance, to a degree, on the resin cement to retain the bridge in position, it is important that patients are provided with information which will maximize the survival of their resin-bonded bridgework. This is presented in Table 1.
You have been provided with a resin-bonded (also called resin-retained or Maryland) bridge in which the pontic (your replacement tooth) is attached to adjacent tooth/teeth using adhesive resin cement. This means that little or no drilling needs to be done to prepare your teeth. Your new bridge therefore relies mainly on its adhesive cement to keep it in position. This may be seen as a disadvantage, but the advantage is that less healthy tooth tissue is removed in comparison to a crown preparation, which is necessary for a conventional fixed bridge. |