References

Mackenzie L, Shortall AC, Burke FJ, Parmar D. Posterior composites: an update. Dent Update. 2019; 46:323-343

Technique Tips: Matrix Revolutions

From Volume 48, Issue 11, December 2021 | Pages 968-969

Authors

Louis Mackenzie

BDS, FDS RCPS FCGDent, Head Dental Officer, Denplan UK, Andover

General Dental Practitioner, Birmingham; Clinical Lecturer, University of Birmingham School of Dentistry, Birmingham, UK.

Articles by Louis Mackenzie

Article

Matrix technique challenges

Matrix technique has been demonstrated to be the most important determinant in the restoration of tight, anatomically correct proximal contacts and contours.1 Unfortunately a high percentage of dentists complain of regular problems with open Class II posterior composite contacts. This primarily results from reliance on out-moded matrices designed for amalgam, such as the notoriously unsuitable Siqveland matrix system. Common errors are illustrated in Figure 1.

Figure 1. Common restorative errors: (A) overhanging margins; (B) open, light or poorly positioned contacts; (C) flat proximal contours; (D) triangular stagnation areas.

To combat this, a range of specialized matrices, wedges and contact forming instruments are available that are designed to:

  • Promote tight, suitably positioned contacts using thin, contoured, burnishable matrices;
  • Reduce the risk of food trapping, subsequent periodontitis and secondary caries;
  • Reduce the risk of adhesive failures that have commonly been tracked to the cervical margins of proximal boxes;
  • Recreate self-cleansing, easy to clean, embrasure anatomy that promotes healthy interdental papillae;
  • Reduce the risk of restorative material extrusion;
  • Promote tooth separation to compensate for matrix thickness, which may be maximized by immediate pre-wedging at the start of restorative procedures;
  • Provide moisture control and haemostasis in clinical situations where rubber dam isolation is not used;
  • Prevent orthodontic movement of restored teeth.
  • Matrix options

    Sectional matrices, wedges and separation rings have been demonstrated to produce optimal restorative contacts, but are not suitable for all clinical situations or for amalgam restorations.1 In larger cavities and those with wider proximal boxes, specialized circumferential matrices, such as AutoMatrix (DentsplySirona, Weybridge, UK) and SuperMat (Kerr, Orange County, CA, USA) (Figure 2) are recommended because they confer a number of advantages (Table 1).1

    Figure 2. Sectional matrix, wedge and separation ring (Optident, Garrison Dental Solutions).

    Creates tight, optimally positioned contact points
    Creates anatomically correct embrasure contours
    Easy to use
    Offers improved instrument access and clearer view of the operative field
    Versatile/reversible positioning options
    Retainerless design does not impede wedge placement
    Minimizes cusp flexion
    Helps to hold rubber dam in place
    Minimizes interproximal restorative finishing
    Suitable for composite and amalgam restorations
    Greater patient comfort
    Cost effective
    Single use eliminates cross-infection risk

    These matrices are applied to the tooth and tightened with a matched instrument. Only metal matrices are recommended for posterior restorations because transparent versions are thick, difficult to insert and stabilize, and cannot be burnished.1 In extensive cavities with limited residual coronal tissue, freehand build-up of missing cusps may be carried out to facilitate circumferential matrix retention and stabilization.

    New Palodent 360

    Launched in January 2021, the Palodent 360 is the latest single-use circumferential matrix system from DentsplySirona. As well as the advantages listed in Table 1, the Palodent 360 does not require a separate tightening instrument and is used according to the following step-by-step guide (Figure 4):

  • Complete cavity preparation, wash and dry.
  • Palodent 360 is a polished stainless-steel matrix that is available in one thin gauge and in three heights (4.5 mm, 5.5 mm, 6.5 mm), with an integrated thermoplastic tightener/retainer.
  • Isolation using a rubber dam or other suitable method.
  • Place the Palodent 360 with a downwards oscillating motion. (Technique tips: matrix may be opened by rotating anticlockwise, so that it is slightly wider than the tooth being restored and the retainer may be orientated in various positions depending on cavity configuration.)
  • Stabilize the matrix with gentle apical pressure and rotate the thumbwheel clockwise to tighten until resistance is felt (the Palodent 360 matrix system is designed for finger tightening only and the integrated tightener/retainer keeps the matrix secure until removal).
  • WaveWedges (DentsplySirona) are placed to optimize the cervical seal, and contacts are burnished against the adjacent teeth.
  • Adhesive/restorative material is placed following the manufacturer's instructions.
  • Wedges may be removed (and placed) with specialized pin tweezers (DentsplySirona).
  • Open and remove the matrix by rotating the thumbwheel anticlockwise.
  • The spool will usually remain attached to the band upon removal, but if preferred, may be opened completely, for example to eliminate leverage forces on newly placed amalgam restorations.
  • Following matrix removal the restoration may be light cured again laterally.
  • Complete restoration/dispose of matrix.
  • Figure 3. (a) AutoMatrix and (b) SuperMat matrix systems.
    Figure 4. (a–l) Step-by-step simulation guide to using the new Palodent 360 matrix system.