References

Elderton RJ. Restorative Dentistry: 1. Current thinking on cavity design. Dent Update. 1986; 13:113-122
Rytomaa I, Jarvinen V, Jarvinen J. Variation in caries recording and restorative treatment plan among university teachers. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1979; 7:335-339
Merrett MCW, Elderton RJ. An in vitro study of restorative dental treatment decisions and secondary caries. Br Dent J. 1984; 157:128-133
Elderton RJ. Assessment and clinical management of early caries in young adults: invasive versus non-invasive methods. Br Dent J. 1985; 158:440-444
Nuttall NM. Capability of a national epidemiological survey to predict General Dental Service treatment. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1983; 11:296-301
Elderton RJ, Nuttall NM. Variation among dentists in planning treatment. Br Dent J. 1983; 154:201-206
Elderton RJ, Davies JA. Restorative dental treatment in the General Dental Service in Scotland. Br Dent J. 1984; 157:196-200
Eddie S. Frequency of attendance in the General Dental Service in Scotland: comparison with claimed attendance. Br Dent J. 1984; 157:267-270
Davies JA. The relationship between change of dentist and treatment received in the General Dental Service. Br Dent J. 1984; 157:322-324
Elderton RJ. The quality of amalgam restorations. In: Allred H (ed). London: London Hospital Medical College; 1977
Elderton RJ. Longitudinal study of dental treatment in the General Dental Service in Scotland. Br Dent J. 1983; 155:91-96
Nuttall NM. Characteristics of dentally successful and dentally unsuccessful adults. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1984; 12:208-212
Elderton RJ. Management of early dental caries in fissures with fissure sealant. Br Dent J. 1985; 158:254-258
Hargreaves JA, Pisko-Dubienski RP. Changes in the surface enamel using three different methods of laser application. J Dent Res. 1984; 63

Restorative dentistry: 2. prospects for the future

From Volume 47, Issue 8, September 2020 | Pages 623-628

Authors

R J Elderton

BDS, PhD

Professor of Preventive and Restorative Dentistry, University of Bristol Dental School, Lower Maudlin Street, Bristol BS1 2LY, UK

Articles by R J Elderton

Article

Current thinking on cavity design revolves around an increased understanding of the need for extremely conservative cavity preparations that are determined mainly by the extent of the caries at the enameldentine junction, rather than upon preconceived ideas embraced by the term ‘outline form’.1

However, considerations of the whole basis of restorative dentistry as a method of managing caries and its sequelae are even more important. It is all too easy to assume that restorations are the perfect and ultimate way of managing caries, but restorative dentistry has many shortcomings and it is necessary to bring these into focus before making any predictions as to prospects for the future. This article looks briefly at some of these shortcomings and forecasts the way in which many of them will have been overcome by the year 2000.

Restorative dentistry is based upon the concept that the surgical excision of carious tissue followed by the restoration of the tooth is the treatment of choice for caries. These procedures in themselves, of course, do not cure the disease; rather, the cause remains and lesions may therefore progress elsewhere in the mouth or, subsequently, occur as secondary caries near the original sites. A true cure for this disease only occurs when the iconic balance between the loss and uptake of calcium and phosphate ions from the lesion can be made to swing in the overall direction of remineralization. The implementation of appropriate preventive measures, such as dietary control, frequent fluoride applications and plaque control, are the main established ways of engendering this.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Dental Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Up to 2 free articles per month
  • New content available