Liou EJ, Pai BC, Lin JC. Do miniscrews remain stationary under orthodontic forces?. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004; 126:42-47
Mizrahi E, Mizrahi B. Mini-screw implants (temporary anchorage devices): orthodontic and pre-prosthetic applications. J Orthod. 2007; 34:(2)80-94
Wahl N. Orthodontics in the 3 millenia. Chaper 15: Skeletal anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008; 134:707-710
Hong H, Ngan P, Han G. Use of onplants as stable anchorage for facemask treatment: a case report. Angle Orthod. 2005; 75:(3)
Gainsforth BL, Higley LB. A study of orthodontic anchorage possibilities of basal bone. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1945; 31:(8)406-417
Creekmore TD, Eklund MK. The possibility of skeletal anchorage. J Orthod. 1983; 17:(4)266-269
Melsen B, Petersen JK, Costa A. Zygoma ligatures: an alternative form of maxillary anchorage. J Clin Orthod. 1998; 32:(3)154-158
Kanomi R. Mini-implant for orthodontic anchorage. J Clin Orthod. 1997; 31:(11)763-767
Roberts WE, Marshall KJ, Mozsary PG. Rigid endosseous implant utilized as anchorage to protract molars and close an atrophic extraction site. Angle Orthod. 1990; 60:(2)135-151
Triaca A, Antonini M, Wintermantel E. Ein neues Titan-Flachschrauben-Implantat zur orthodontischen verankerung an anterioren Gaumen. Inform Orthod Kieferorthop. 1992; 24:251-257
Costa A, Raffaini M, Melsen B. Microscrews as orthodontic anchorage: a preliminary report. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognathic Surg. 1998; 13:201-209
Young KA, Melrose CA, Harrison JEH. Skeletal anchorage systems in orthodontics: absolute anchorage. A dream or reality?. J Orthod. 2007; 34:(2)101-110
Baumgaertel S, Razavi MR, Hans MGM. Mini-implant anchorage for the Orthodontic Practitioner. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008; 133:(4)621-627
Cacciafesta V. JCO Roundtable: Skeletal anchorage Part 1. Panelists discuss common applications of miniscrews. J Clin Orthod. 2009; 43:(5)
Sherwood KH, Burch JG, Thompson WJ. Closing anterior open bites by intruding molars with titanium miniplate anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002; 122:593-600
Reynders R, Ronchi L, Bipat S. Mini-implants in orthodontics: a systematic review of the literature. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009; 135
Park HS, Kwon TG, Kwon OW. Treatment of open bite with microscrew implants anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004; 126:(5)627-636
Kuroda S, Katayama A, Takano-Yamamoto T. Severe anterior open bite case treated using titanium screw anchorage. Angle Orthod. 2004; 74:(4)
Rachala MR, Harikrishnan P. Management of severe anterior open bite in an adult patient using miniscrews as skeletal anchorage. Int J Orthod. 2010; 21:(1)9-14
Kuroda S, Sakai Y, Tamamura N Treatment of severe anterior open bite with skeletal anchorage in adults: comparison with orthognathic surgery outcomes. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007; 132:(5)
Vibhute PJ. Molar-stabilising power arm and miniscrew anchorage for anterior retraction. J Clin Orthod. 2010; 44:(11)
Breuning KH. Correction of a Class III malocclusion with over 20 mm of space to close in the maxilla by using miniscrews for extra anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008; 133:(3)459-469
Jamilian A, Showkatbakhsh R. Treatment of maxillary defiency by miniscrew implants. J Orthod. 2010; 37:(2)
Kook YA, Kim SH. Treatment of Class III relapse due to late mandibular growth using miniscrew anchorage. J Clin Orthod. 2008; 42:(7)
Park HS, Kwon TG. Sliding mechanics with miniscrew implant anchorage. Angle Orthod. 2004; 74:(5)
Upadhyay M, Yadav S, Nagarai K. Treatment effects of mini-implants for en-masse retraction of anterior teeth in bialveolar dental protrusion patients: a randomised controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008; 134:18-29
Jung MH. Biomechanical considerations in treatment with miniscrew anchorage. J Clin Orthod. 2008; 42:(6)329-337
Park YC, Choi YJ, Choi NC Aesthetic segmental retraction of maxillary anterior teeth with a palatal appliance and orthodontic mini-implants. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007; 131:(4)
Park HS, Lee SK, Kwon OH. Group distal movement of teeth using microscrew implant anchorage. Angle Orthod. 2005; 75:602-609
Herman RJ, Currier GF, Miyake A. Mini-implant anchorage for maxillary canine retraction: a pilot study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006; 130:228-235
Papadopoulis MA. Orthodontic treatment of Class II malocclusion with miniscrew implants. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008; 134:(5)
Munoz A, Maino G, Lemler J. Skeletal anchorage for Class II correction in a growing patient. J Clin Orthod. 2009; 43:(5)325-331
Lee JS, Park HS, Kyung HM. Micro-implant anchorage for lingual treatment of a skeletal class II malocclusion. J Clin Orthod. 2001; 35
Yao CC, Wu CB, Wu HY Intrusion of the overerupted upper first left first and second molars by mini implants with partial fixed orthodontic appliances: a case report. Angle Orthod. 2004; 74:550-557
Bonetti GA, Verganti S, Zanarini M Orthodontic intrusion of posterior teeth using dental implant anchorage. J Clin Orthod. 2008; 42:(4)222-225
Choi KJ, Choi JH, Lee SY Facial improvements after molar intrusion with miniscrew anchorage. J Clin Orthod. 2007; 41:(5)273-280
Graham JW. Temporary replacement of maxillary lateral incisors with miniscrews and bonded pontics. J Clin Orthod. 2007; 41:(6)321-325
Weisner SM. Treatment of a skeletal class III malocclusion with mandibular asymmetry using a single miniscrew. J Clin Orthod. 2009; 43:(5)335-341
Kinzinger GS, Gulden N, Yildizhan F Efficiency of a skeletonised distal jet appliance supported by miniscrew anchorage for noncompliance maxillary molar distalisation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009; 136:(4)578-586
Buschang P, Carrillo R. 2008 Survey of AAO members on miniscrew usage. J Orthod. 2008; 42:(9)
Moon C, Lee D, Lee H Factors associated with the success rate of orthodontic miniscrews placed in the upper and lower posterior buccal region. Angle Orthod. 2008; 78:(1)
Janssen V. Skeletal anchorage in Orthodontics – a review of various systems in animal and human studies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008; 23:75-88
Cheng SJ, Tseng IY, Lee JJ. A prospective study of the risk factors associated with failure of mini-implants used for orthodontic anchorage. Int J Oral Maxillo Impl. 2004; 19:(1)
Kim YH, Yang SM, Kim S Midpalatal miniscrews for orthodontic anchorage: factors affecting clinical success. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010; 137:66-72
Kuroda S, Sugawara Y, Deguchi T Clinical use of miniscrew implants as orthodontic anchorage: success rates and postoperative discomfort. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007; 131:9-15
Asscherickx K, Vannet BV, Bottenberg P Clinical observations and success rates of palatal implants. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010; 137:114-122
Park HS, Jeong SH, Kwon OH. Factors affecting the clinical success of screw implants used as orthodontic anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006; 130:18-25
Thiruvenkatachari AK. Comparison of rate of canine retraction with conventional molar anchorage and titanium implant anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008; 134:30-35
Reinforcement of anchorage during orthodontic brace treatment with implants or other surgical methods (review). 2009. http://www.thecochranelibrary.com
Yao CC, Lai EHH, Chang JZC Comparison of treatment outcomes between skeletal anchorage and extraoral anchorage in adults with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008; 134:(5)
Deguchi T, Murakami T, Kuroda S Comparison of the intrusion effects on the maxillary incisors between implant anchorage and J-hook headgear. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008; 133:654-660
Benson PE, Tinsley D, O'Dwyer J Midpalatal implants vs headgear for orthodontic anchorage – a randomised clinical trial: cephalometric results. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007; 132:606-615
Crismani B. Miniscrews in orthodontic treatment: review and analysis of published clinical trials. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010; 137:108-113
Miyawaki S, Koyama I, Inoue M Factors associated with the stability of titanium screws placed in the posterior region for orthodontic anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003; 124:373-378
Tsaousidis G, Bauss O. Influence of insertion site on the failure rates of orthodontic miniscrews. J Orofac Orthop. 2008; 69:(5)349-356
Chen KZ. Critical factors for the success of orthodontic mini-implants: a systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009; 135:284-291
Luzi C, Verna C, Melsen B. A prospective clinical investigation of the failure rate of immediately loaded mini-implants used for orthodontic anchorage. Prog Orthod. 2007; 8:(1)192-201
Bayat B. Effect of smoking on the failure rates of orthodontic miniscrews. J Orofacial Orthop. 2010; 71:117-124
Garfinkle JS, Cunningham JR, Beeman CS Evaluation of orthodontic mini implant anchorage in premolar extraction therapy in adolescents. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008; 133:(5)642-653
Gelgor I, Buyukyilmaz T, Karaman AI Intraosseous screw supported upper molar distalisation. Angle Orthod. 2004; 74:838-850
Chen C, Chang C, Hsieh CH The use of microimplants in orthodontic anchorage. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006; 64:1209-1213
Lee K, Kim K, Lee J Computed tomographic analysis of tooth-bearing alveolar bone for orthodontic miniscrew placement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009; 135:486-494
Pickard M, Dechow P, Rossouw P Effects of miniscrew orientation on implant stability and resistance to failure. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010; 137:91-99
Viwattanatipa N, Thanakitcharu S, Uttraravichien A Survival analyses of surgical miniscrews as orthodontic anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009; 136:29-36
Kadioglu O, Buyukyilmaz T, Zachrisson BU Contact damage to root surfaces of premolars touching miniscrews during orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008; 134:353-360
Maino G, Weiland F, Attanasi A Root damage and repair after contact with miniscrews. J Clin Orthod. 2007; 41:(12)
Poggio PM, Incorvati C, Velo S “Safe zones”. A guide for miniscrew positioning in the maxillary and mandibular arch. Angle Orthod. 2006; 76
Oliver R, Knapman YM. Attitudes to orthodontic treatment. Br J Orthod. 1985; 12:(4)
Cornelis MA, Scheffler NR, Nyssen-Behets C. Patients' and orthodontists' perceptions of miniplates used for temporary skeletal anchorage: a prospective study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthod. 2008; 133:(1)18-24
Lee TC, McGrath CP, Wong RW Patients' perceptions regarding microimplant as anchorage. Angle Orthod. 2008; 78:(2)
Baxmann M Expectations, acceptance and preferences regarding microimplant treatment in orthodontic patients: a randomised controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010; 138:250.e1-250.e10
This is a literature search about the clinical use of temporary anchorage devices (TADs) as a means of providing effective orthodontic anchorage. It takes the reader through a journey from the initial description of the technique to the enormous popularity TADs are currently experiencing in clinical practice. This paper aims to present good quality clinical information to allow the clinician and the patient to make an informed decision.
Clinical Relevance: The purpose of this literature review is to provide readers with an overview of the current available literature on this subject and encourage general dental practitioners to adopt a more evidence-based approach to this aspect of orthodontic care.
Article
Anchorage in orthodontics can be defined as the resistance to unwanted tooth movement during treatment. This can be provided by intra-oral anchor sites like the teeth and palate or, alternatively, extra-oral devices such as headgear (Figure 1). Unfortunately, these conventional methods have a major drawback: they all rely on patient compliance in order to be successful.1 It has been every orthodontist's dream to have stationary anchorage. Recent literature has suggested that the introduction of miniscrews or temporary anchorage devices (TADs), a term of American origin,2 has created a whole new successful era in the world of orthodontics.
Successful skeletal anchorage is the main biological concept behind these devices and this offers two possibilities:
Osseo-integrated dental implants, including palatal implants and some retromolar implants, often fall into the category of indirect anchorage. One commonly used mid-palatal implant from Straumann has a diameter of 3.75 mm and length of 8 mm, whereas normal ‘dental’ implants, replacing individual teeth, can vary in length from 7–20 mm. These osseo-integrated implants have been used for direct anchorage in the past prior to them being used to replace the dentition.
Register now to continue reading
Thank you for visiting Dental Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits: