Milsom KM, Tickle M, King D. Does the dental profession know how to care for the primary dentition?. Br Dent J. 2003; 195:301-303
Levine RS, Pitts NB, Nugent ZJ. The fate of 1,587 unrestored carious deciduous teeth: a retrospective general dental practice based study from northern England. Br Dent J. 2002; 193:99-103
Tickle M, Milsom KM, King D, Kearney-Mitchell P, Blinkhorn AS. The fate of carious primary teeth of children who regularly attend the general dental services. Br Dent J. 2002; 192:219-223
Stephenson J, Chadwick BL, Playle RA, Treasure ET. A competing risk survival analysis model to assess the efficacy of filling carious primary teeth. Caries Res. 2010; 44:285-293
Tickle M, Threlfall AG, Pilkington L, Milsom KM, Duggal MS, Blinkhorn AS. Approaches taken to the treatment of young children with carious primary teeth: a national cross-sectional survey of general dental practitioners and paediatric specialists in England. Br Dent J. 2007; 203 https://doi.org/10.1038/bdj.2007.570
Innes NP, Stirrups DR, Evans DJ, Hall N, Leggate MA. A novel technique using preformed metal crowns for managing carious primary molars in general practice – a retrospective analysis. Br Dent J. 2006; 200:451-454
Innes NP, Evans DJ, Stirrups DR. Sealing caries in primary molars: randomized control trial, 5-year results. J Dent Res. 2011; 90:1405-1410
Chadwick BL, Evans DJ. Restoration of class II cavities in primary molar teeth with conventional and resin modified glass ionomer cements: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2007; 8:14-21
Innes NP, Marshman Z, Vendan RE. A group of general dental practitioners' views of preformed metal crowns after participation in the Hall Technique clinical trial: a mixed-method evaluation. Prim Dent Care. 2010; 17:33-37
Santamaria RM, Innes NP, Machiulskiene V, Evans DJ, Alkilzy M, Splieth CH. Acceptability of different caries management methods for primary molars in a RCT. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2014; https://doi.org/10.1111/ipd.12097.15
Bell SJ, Morgan AG, Marshman Z, Rodd HD. Child and parental acceptance of preformed metal crowns. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2010; 11:(5)218-224
Threlfall AG, Pilkington L, Milsom KM, Blinkhorn AS, Tickle M. General dental practitioners' views on the use of stainless steel crowns to restore primary molars. Br Dent J. 2005; 199:453-455
Page LA, Boyd DH, Davidson SE, McKay SK, Thomson WM, Innes NP. Acceptability of the Hall Technique to parents and children. N Z Dent J. 2014; 110:12-17
Gilchrist F, Morgan AG, Farman M, Rodd HD. Impact of the Hall Technique for preformed metal crown placement on undergraduate paediatric dentistry experience. Eur J Dent Educ. 2013; 17:e10-e15 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0579.2012.00751
Ricketts D, Lamont T, Innes NP, Kidd E, Clarkson JE. Operative caries management in adults and children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; 3 https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003808.pub3
Innes N, Evans D.: University of Dundee; 2010
van der Zee V, van Amerongen WE. Short communication: Influence of preformed metal crowns (Hall Technique) on the occlusal vertical dimension in the primary dentition. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2010; 11:225-227
Innes NPT, Clarkson JE, Speed C, Douglas GVA, Maguire A The FiCTION dental trial protocol – filling children's teeth: indicated or not?. BMC Oral Health. 2013; 13 https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6831-13-25
An overview of preformed metal crowns part 2: the hall technique Amy C Hyde Helen J Rogers Haris A Batley Annie G Morgan Chris Deery Dental Update 2024 42:10, 707-709.
Authors
Amy CHyde
BDS
Dental Core Trainee 2 in Paediatric Dentistry, Department of Paediatric Dentistry, Charles Clifford Dental Hospital, Claremont Crescent, Sheffield, S10 2TA, UK.
Academic Clinical Fellow in Paediatric Dentistry, Unit of Oral Health and Development, School of Clinical Dentistry, University of Sheffield, Claremont Crescent, Sheffield, S10 2TA, UK.
Part 2 of this series of two articles addresses the Hall Technique for preformed metal crowns. It will discuss the need for an effective child and dentist friendly method to restore carious primary molars. The technique is described in detail and the evidence for its effectiveness and acceptance by children, parents, dentists and dental educators is presented.
CPD/Clinical Relevance: Dentists and dental care professionals should be aware of the evidence to support the adoption of the Hall Technique.
Article
In the previous paper the indications, evidence and use of the ‘conventional technique’ for placing preformed metal crowns (PMCs) were described. This second article on the use of PMCs will discuss the Hall Technique. In England, 27.9% of 5-year-olds have experience of dentinal caries at an epidemiological level.1 More significantly, the Care Index (the percentage of teeth which require restoration, which are restored) is only 11.2%. The true prevalence is of course much higher, as a thorough clinical examination supported by radiographs would detect many more lesions, at a time when they would be more likely to result in a successful restoration because the caries would be less advanced than those presenting later, when the carious teeth are unrestorable. Reasons suggested for a lack of restoration of primary teeth include:
Furthermore, the success of restorations placed in primary dental care has previously been questioned in a retrospective case note study.4 Conversely, a much larger cohort study has clearly demonstrated, in 2,654 British children aged 4–5 years at baseline, that the survival of restored primary molar teeth is much better than for unrestored molars.5
Register now to continue reading
Thank you for visiting Dental Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits: