Garib DG, Peck S. Extreme variations in the shape of mandibular premolars. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006; 130:(3)317-323
Kim JY, Cha YG, Cho SW, Kim EJ, Lee MJ, Lee JM Inhibition of apoptosis in early tooth development alters tooth shape and size. J Dent Res. 2006; 85:(6)530-535
Rootkin-Gray VF, Sheehy EC. Macrodontia of a mandibular second premolar: a case report. ASDC J Dent Child. 2001; 68:(5–6)347-349
Tahmassebi JF, Day PF, Toumba J, Andreadis GA. Paediatric dentistry in the new millennium: 6. Dental anomalies in children. Dent Update. 2003; 30:(10)534-540
Dugmore CR. Bilateral macrodontia of mandibular second premolars: a case report. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2001; 11:(1)69-73
Crawford PJM, Aldred MJ. Anomalies of tooth formation and eruption, 3rd edn. In: Welbury RR, Duggal MS, Hosey M (eds). New York: Oxford University Press; 2005
Hellekant M, Twetman S, Carlsson L. Treatment of a Class II division 1 malocclusion with macrodontia of the maxillary central incisors. J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001; 119:(6)654-659
Gazit E, Lieberman MA. Macrodontia of maxillary central incisors: case reports. Quintessence Int. 1991; 22:(11)883-887
Tuna EB, Yildirim M, Seymen F, Gencay K, Ozgen M. Fused teeth: a review of the treatment options. J Dent Child (Chic). 2009; 76:(2)109-116
Killian CM, Croll TP. Dental twinning anomalies: the nomenclature enigma. Quintessence Int. 1990; 21:(7)571-576
Ammari AB, Young RG, Welbury R, Fung DE. A report of treatment of a fused permanent central incisor and supplemental lateral incisor. Dent Update. 2008; 35:(9)636-641
Peker I, Kayaoglu G. A case of Ekman-Westborg-Julin trait: endodontic treatment of a macrodontic incisor. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009; 107:(5)e89-e92
Altug-Atac AT, Erdem D. Prevalence and distribution of dental anomalies in orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007; 131:(4)510-514
Bryan RA, Welbury RR. Treatment of aesthetic problems in paediatric dentistry. Dent Update. 2003; 30:(6)307-313
Conservative management of macrodontia in the mixed dentition stage – a case report Ann R Harker Sian Walley Sondos Albadri Dental Update 2024 42:10, 707-709.
Authors
Ann RHarker
BDS(Hons), MFDS RCSEd
Clinical Demonstrator in Paediatric Dentistry, Leeds University and General Dental Practitioner, School of Dentistry, University of Liverpool, UK
Macrodontia is a rare dental abnormality, which can cause cosmetic concerns. Various management techniques for this condition have been documented in the literature. This case describes the initial management of macrodontia in the mixed dentition stage with the use of a minimally invasive approach to treatment.
CPD/Clinical Relevance: The importance of early referral of dental abnormities is highlighted. Short- and long-term treatment options for macrodontia are described, including the impact such anomalies can have on the developing dentition.
Article
Managing dental abnormalities resulting in the alteration of tooth size and shape can present as an aesthetic and functional challenge to the dental practitioner. Macrodontia, a term used to describe teeth that are larger than would normally be expected, is characterized by an increase in the mesio-distal and facio-lingual tooth dimensions.1 The aetiology of this condition is still not fully understood, but it may be caused by a disruption to apoptosis during tooth development.2 Fortunately, macrodontia is relatively rare,3 having a prevalence of 1.1% in the permanent dentition.4
True macrodontia can be classified into three types:5
Descriptive terminology of macrodontia can be confusing, but true macrodontia of a single tooth should not be confused with gemination or fusion of two teeth (double teeth) early in odontogenesis, giving the appearance of one larger tooth.8 The term fusion is used to describe two separately developing teeth united via dentine and/or enamel.9 A review of the literature by Tuna et al reported the aetiology of this anomaly to be necrosis of intervening epithelial tissue caused by pressure between two developing teeth.10 Where fusion occurs, macrodontia will present along with one or two pulp chambers and typically there will be one less tooth in the arch,11,10 unless the fusion is between a normal and a supernumery tooth.12 Gemination can be defined as the formation of two teeth believed to arise from one dental follicle attempting to separate. In this case, there is usually only one pulp chamber and the correct number of teeth in the dental arch, if the double tooth is counted as one unit.11,10 Often present is a notch or groove on the crown.9 The prevalence of double teeth in the Caucasian population is reported at 0.1–0.2% in the permanent dentition and most frequently the anterior segments are affected.4
Register now to continue reading
Thank you for visiting Dental Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits: