References

Ruiz JL. The three golden rules occlusion. Dent Today. 2010; 29:92-93
5 Requirements for Occlusal Stability. Dawson Academy White Paper. 2013. https://dental.thedawsonacademy.com/requirements-for-occlusal-stability (accessed April 2022)
Mehta S, Banerji S. The application of occlusion in clinical practice part 1: Essential concepts in clinical occlusion. Dent Update. 2018; 45:1003-1015
Wise MD. Occlusion and restorative dentistry for the general practitioner. Br Dent J. 1982; 152:316-322
Iwaki Y, Wakabayashi N, Igarashi Y. Dimensional accuracy of optical bite registration in single and multiple unit restorations. Oper Dent. 2013; 38:309-315 https://doi.org/10.2341/12-233-L
Diagnosis, the relevance of articulation and modern occlusal practice for the busy dental practitioner. 2020. https://tinyurl.com/y26wv5tp (accessed April 2022)
Lepidi L, Galli M, Mastrangelo F Virtual articulators and virtual mounting procedures: where do we stand?. J Prosthodont. 2021; 30:24-35 https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13240
Solaberrieta E, Garmendia A, Brizuela A Intraoral digital impressions for virtual occlusal records: section quantity and dimensions. Biomed Res Int. 2016; 2016
Ahlholm P, Sipilä K, Vallittu P Digital versus conventional impressions in fixed prosthodontics: a review. J Prosthodont. 2018; 27:35-41 https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12527
Gintaute A, Keeling AJ, Osnes CA Precision of maxillo-mandibular registration with intraoral scanners in vitro. J Prosthodont Res. 2020; 64:114-119 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2019.05.006
Park J, Jeon J, Heo S. Accuracy comparison of buccal bite scans by five intra-oral scanners. J Dent Rehabil Appl Sci. 2018; 34:17-31
Shillingborg HT, Hobo S, Whitsett LD The Fundamentals of Fixed Prosthodontics, 2nd edn. Chicago, IL, USA: Quintessence; 1997
Jensen WO. Occlusion for the Class III jaw relations patient. J Prosthet Dent. 1990; 64:566-558 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90129-z
Shetty TB, Beyuo F, Wilson NHF. Upper anterior tooth dimensions in a young-adult Indian population in the UK: implications for aesthetic dentistry. Br Dent J. 2017; 223:781-786 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2017.986
Cranham J. Why porcelain chips and breaks. Inside Dentistry. 2013; 9:(7)
Davies S, Gray RM. What is occlusion?. Br Dent J. 2001; 191:235-245 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4801151a
Christensen GJ. Zirconia crowns: what dentists and labs need to know in 2020!. Clinicians Report. 2020; 13:1-4
Kuraray Europe GmbH. Frequently asked questions KatanaZirconia block. Version 07-18. 2018. https://tinyurl.com/mryd2cpt (accessed April 2022)
Daou EE. The zirconia ceramic: strengths and weaknesses. Open Dent J. 2014; 8:33-42 https://doi.org/10.2174/1874210601408010033
Koutayas SO, Vagkopoulou T, Pelekanos S Zirconia in dentistry: part 2. Evidence-based clinical breakthrough. Eur J Esthet Dent. 2009; 4:348-380
Kelly RD, Kelleher MGD. Is ‘digital dentistry’ dangerous for teeth? problems associated with zirconia and CAD/CAM restorations. Prim Dent J. 2019; 8:52-60 https://doi.org/10.1308/205016819826439475
Schmitter M, Mueller D, Rues S. Chipping behaviour of all-ceramic crowns with zirconia framework and CAD/CAM manufactured veneer. J Dent. 2012; 40:154-162
Sailer I, Gottnerb J, Kanelb S, Hammerle CH. Randomized controlled clinical trial of zirconia-ceramic and metal-ceramic posterior fixed dental prostheses: a 3-year follow-up. Int J Prosthodont. 2009; 22:553-560
Zhang Y, Lawn BR. Fatigue sensitivity of Y-TZP to microscale sharp-contact flaws. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2005; 72:388-392
Zhang Y, Pajares A, Lawn BR. Fatigue and damage tolerance of Y-TZP ceramics in layered biomechanical systems. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2004; 71:166-171 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.30083
Zhang Y, Lawn BR, Rekow ED, Thompson VP. Effect of sandblasting on the long-term performance of dental ceramics. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2004; 71:381-386 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.30097

Revisiting the Functionally Generated Path Technique: Is this an Aid to Predictable Digital Occlusal Design? Part 1: Introduction and Background

From Volume 49, Issue 5, May 2022 | Pages 371-378

Authors

Tom Bereznicki

BDS(Edin), MFDTEd, MFDSEng, MCGDent

Visiting Clinical Specialist Teacher, Department of Primary Dental Care, King's College London; Private Practice, Dawood & Tanner, Wimpole Street, London

Articles by Tom Bereznicki

Email Tom Bereznicki

Rohit Patel

BDS, MFDS RCS Ed

Clinical Tutor, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Queen Mary, University of London; General Practice, Brickfields Dental, Chelmsford

Articles by Rohit Patel

Megan Clark

BDS(Hons), BSc(Hons) AKC

Oral Surgery, Speciality Trainee, Newcastle

Articles by Megan Clark

Abstract

Registering a pre-existing occlusal scheme is paramount to the long-term success of a fixed restoration(s) and a requirement when working conformatively, whether in analogue or digital format. Part 1 of this two-part series highlights those occlusal schemes that provide difficulties using established techniques in arriving at a predictable restoration requiring minimal occlusal adjustments chairside. Part 2 introduces the theory of the functionally generated path (FGP) technique, and two cases involving implant-retained restorations will be used to highlight the benefit of adopting this technique into the digital workflow in the provision of occlusally precise restorations.

CPD/Clinical Relevance: This article provides an overview of difficult occlusal schemes and identifies those that would benefit from using the functionally generated path technique in the provision of occlusally correct restorations.

Article

Occlusion is of key importance in the provision of a long-lasting and functional restoration. Particularly when working conformatively, it is imperative that the correct information is provided to the laboratory to fabricate the appropriate restoration. Therefore, understanding occlusion and the challenges faced when patients do not conform to the ideal Class I occlusal relationship is fundamental to being able to provide a restoration that is predictable and accurate, with minimal occlusal adjustments required chairside at the fit appointment. This information is just as important if working with a digital format as errors can be amplified and may go unnoticed until the final fit. Milled zirconia restorations can generally only undergo a limited degree of adjustment before having to be remade. Part 1 of this two-part series highlights those difficult occlusal cases that would benefit from the use of the functionally generated path (FGP) technique to help avoid some of these errors by providing an accurate and predictable occlusal scheme for the final restoration. Part 2 explains the FGP technique and its adaptation from its analogue background to the digital workflow. Two cases of implant-retained restorations are used to demonstrate the technique step by step.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Dental Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Up to 2 free articles per month
  • New content available