Thomason JM, Kelly SA, Bendkowski A, Ellis JS. Two implant retained overdentures--a review of the literature supporting the McGill and York consensus statements. J Dent. 2012; 40:(1)22-34 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2011.08.017
Beddis HP, Durey KA, Chan MFWY. Survey of consultants in restorative dentistry in the UK regarding ongoing care of patients provided with dental implants. Br Dent J. 2017; 223:255-260 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2017.711
The implant passport: a tool for implant maintenance and post-operative care Kuljit Kaur Grewal Alex Daly Jenna Trainor Dental Update 2024 49:11, 707-709.
This article discusses the use of an implant passport to document and standardize important information relating to specific implant treatment for both the patient and their present and future clinicians. This aims to facilitate monitoring and provide salient information for any future clinician providing implant care.
CPD/Clinical Relevance: The implant passport is a useful aid to deliver information concisely and accurately to the patient's GDP
Article
Dental implant treatment has now become widely accessible to patients, and as such, patients may present to different centres for implant provision and maintenance. Implant treatment is praised for providing fixed solutions for tooth replacement, as well as anchorage for removable prosthesis, and where used appropriately, can provide good longevity, aesthetics and improve quality of life.1 For providers of implant care, the lack of information about existing implant work can present challenges to further treatment. The implant passport describes information that is included into the discharge information. The passport provides details relating to the implant fixture and prosthesis as well as key biological parameters to be retained by the patient and used by future clinicians who may become involved in their care.
The provision of implants on the NHS
The provision of dental implants on the NHS is limited to patients meeting certain eligibility criteria in secondary care centres. Funding is often tightly controlled and, in many institutions, is subject to individual funding requests to the commissioning body. For approved requests, secondary care funding may cover the active cost of treatment, but not post-treatment maintenance or the cost of further treatment. Patients are instead usually discharged back to primary care for long-term follow-up. The GDP has responsibility for monitoring implants for disease and providing preventive and supportive care (Table 1). Patients who receive implant restorations via the NHS should be made aware not only of the risks of biological and technical failure, but also that any costs related to implant maintenance and further treatment may not be funded by the NHS.2
Responsibility of the GDP
Oral hygiene assessment
Bleeding indices
Probing chart
Radiographs
Monitoring of the prosthesis for fracture, wear as well as occlusion
Re-referral to the provider or other implant provider if any problem is noted
Responsibility of the provider
Obtaining intra-oral radiographs of each dental implant taken following the fit of the prosthesis to enable the monitoring of the bone levels at future appointments
Obtaining a peri-implant charting following the fit of the prosthesis to enable monitoring and assessment of the peri-implant tissues at future appointments
Providing the patient with dental hygiene advice specific to their dental implant restoration
Ensuring that the patient understands that they may need to fund their maintenance care for implants and the prosthesis on a regular basis
Ensuring that the patient understands that their dentist will monitor their implants and prosthesis for them. However this may encounter private costs for maintenance, repair and replacement.
Ensuring that the patient understands that their dentist can re-refer them if problems arise in the future, but that further treatment may not receive NHS funding
Providing the GDP with details of the treatment undertaken
Providing replacement or corrective treatment when necessary if problems occur within the first year after completion of treatment
Treatment of peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis where implants have been placed under NHS contract*
*Included from the Commissioning Standard for Restorative Dentistry.
Communicating information about implant treatments
The challenges for GDPs providing implant monitoring and maintenance care have been highlighted.3 Succinct, baseline information on important parameters aids monitoring and early detection of problems. Implant providers should ensure that the following information is provided to the GDP and the patient:2
Type of prosthesis: fixed or removable, presence of locators, bar and clip attachment;
Cement- or screw-retained restorations: the presence of material in the screw access hole, the type of cement used (if any) and the site of the access hole within each abutment, and prosthetic screw used;
Peri-implant pocket chart;
Radiographs taken following the fit of the prosthesis;
Monitoring and expected maintenance regimen required;
Tailored instructions appropriate to the type of restoration given to the patient to facilitate their day-to-day dental and oral hygiene around the implants.
The implant passport
An example of an implant passport is provided in Figure 1. It is incorporated into the discharge documentation and sent to both the patient and GDP. The information provided in the passport ensures patients, GDPs and future providers of implant care are aware of the details of care provided, as well as baseline information to facilitate monitoring, maintenance, and prompt treatment going forward.
Summary
The implant passport forms an important part of the information provided to patient and their GDP at discharge. The authors recommend that providers incorporate the implant passport tool into their practice when discharging patients back to GDPs to facilitate information exchange and future treatment delivery.