References

Bonsor SJ, Pearson GJ. A Clinical Guide to Applied Dental Materials.Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier; 2013
Burke FJT. Own label materials: scientific evidence. Dent Update. 2017; 44
Burke FJT. Enhancing adhesive restoration effectiveness. Dent Update. 2020; 47:545-547
Burke FJT. The evidence base for ‘own label’ resin-based dental restoratives. Dent Update. 2013; 40:5-6 https://doi.org/10.12968/denu.2013.40.1.5a
Johnsen GF, Thieu MK, Hussain B Own brand label restorative materials – a false bargain?. J Dent. 2017; 56:84-98 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2016.11.004
Mickenautsch S. How well are GIC product labels related to current systematic review evidence?. Dent Update. 2011; 38:634-644 https://doi.org/10.12968/denu.2011.38.9.634
Shaw K, Martins R, Hadis MA ‘Own-label’ versus branded commercial dental resin composite materials: mechanical and physical property comparisons. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2016; 24:122-129 https://doi.org/10.1922/EJPRD_01559Shaw08
Bonsor SJ, Palin WM. ‘Let there be light, and there was light, but was it enough? A review of modern dental light curing. Dent Update. 2021; 48:633-640
Bonsor SJ, Camilleri J. Hydraulic cements for various intracoronal applications. Dent Update. 2021; 48:653-660
Mackenzie LM, Waplington M, Bonsor SJ. Splendid isolation: a practical guide to the use of rubber dam part 1. Dent Update. 2020; 47:548-558
Mackenzie LM, Waplington M, Bonsor SJ. Splendid isolation: a practical guide to the use of rubber dam part 2. Dent Update. 2020; 47:633-642
Heintze SD, Rousson V. Clinical effectiveness of direct class II restorations – a meta-analysis. J Adhes Dent. 2012; 14:407-431 https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a28390
Keys W, Carson SJ. Rubber dam may increase the survival time of dental restorations. Evid Based Dent. 2017; 18:19-20 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ebd.6401221
Quality guidelines for endodontic treatment: consensus report of the European Society of Endodontology. Int Endod J. 2006; 39:921-930 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01180.x
Medical Device Directive 2007/47/EC. 2010;
European Union. Commission implementing decision (EU) 2020/437 of 24 March 2020 on the harmonised standards for medical devices drafted in support of Council Directive 93/42/EEC C/2020/1901. 2020. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dec_impl/2020/437/oj (accessed July 2021)

Technique tips: Ten top tips to overcome common mistakes concerning the use of dental materials

From Volume 48, Issue 8, September 2021 | Pages 707-709

Authors

Stephen J Bonsor

BDS(Hons) MSc FHEA FDS RCPS(Glasg) FDFTEd FCGDent GDP

The Dental Practice, 21 Rubislaw Terrace, Aberdeen; Hon Senior Clinical Lecturer, Institute of Dentistry, University of Aberdeen; Online Tutor/Clinical Lecturer, University of Edinburgh, UK.

Articles by Stephen J Bonsor

Article

Very often, little regard or thought is given to the importance of the selection, clinical handling and usage of dental materials. This is a potentially serious oversight leading to the substandard performance of the material clinically and, therefore, a poor treatment outcome for the patient. The aim of the present article is to highlight 10 factors that, if adopted, will improve the clinical performance of dental materials and biomaterials and so, the prognosis of treatment.

This is the most important tip and one that can never be repeated too often or stressed too much. Regrettably, it is one that many dentists fail to do often, or indeed, at all. On receipt of a new product, the temptation to discard the directions for use (DFU) should be resisted (Figure 1).1 These instructions should be read thoroughly, and in full, prior to attempting to use the material. Failure to do so carries a distinct risk of misuse of the material, leading to inferior clinical performance. It should never be assumed how a material should be handled and the dental team should not be tempted to guess. Furthermore, it is considered good practice to recheck the DFU with each new batch of material in case the product has changed surreptitiously because of product development, regulatory demands or ongoing product safety. Many clinics keep a folder of DFUs in an easily accessible central location for reference by all members of the dental team (Figure 2). Responsibility for its maintenance normally lies with the staff member tasked with stock control and who should insert the DFU from the latest batch and remove the existing one.1

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Dental Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Up to 2 free articles per month
  • New content available